skip to main content

Operational Load on Material Handling Process Stockyard Ship to Port Using Field Tests

*Sunarso Sugeng  -  Department of Industrial Technology, Vocational Chollage, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Mohammad Ridwan  -  Department of Industrial Technology, Vocational Chollage, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Samuel Febriary Khristyson  -  Department of Industrial Technology, Vocational Chollage, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 TEKNIK

Citation Format:
Abstract

Since all equipment needs to be handled correctly, the equipment handling procedure is crucial. in order to ensure the equipment's safe arrival at its destination and to preserve its quality and condition. The method used in this research to analyze the calculation using experiment set with sensor data and observation. Finding the optimal operational load process value during material loading and unloading at the Panjang Port is the aim of this study. From analyze results horizontal direction movement speed of 2 km/h has a pressure value of 37 kPa with a distance of 376 mm from the center end of the pipe being unloaded, across the stress value is at 167 kPa with a stretch distance of less than 300 mm, longitudinal direction of 45 kPa.

Keywords: operational load; loading unloading; stockyard; ship

Article Metrics:

  1. Balaji Naik, K., Prabhu, M., & Allen Jeffrey, J. (2022). A review on vibration analysis of Glass/Carbon/Basalt composite pipe material for petroleum industry. Materials Today: Proceedings, 51, 1042–1045. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.086">[Crossref]

  2. d’Amore, F., Romano, M. C., & Bezzo, F. (2021). Optimal design of European supply chains for carbon capture and storage from industrial emission sources including pipe and ship transport. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 109, 103372. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103372">[Crossref]

  3. Ding, L., Khan, F., Guo, X., & Ji, J. (2021). A novel approach to reduce fire-induced domino effect risk by leveraging loading/unloading demands in chemical industrial parks. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 146, 610–619. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.11.050">[Crossref]

  4. Gao, X., Shao, Y., Chen, C., Zhu, H., & Li, K. (2022). Experimental and numerical investigation on transverse impact resistance behaviour of pipe-in-pipe submarine pipelines after service time. Ocean Engineering, 248, 110868. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110868">[Crossref]

  5. He, W., Wan, M., & Meng, B. (2022). Size effect on nonlinear unloading behavior and Bauschinger effect of Ni-based superalloy ultrathin sheet. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 231, 107563. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107563">[Crossref]

  6. Kim, J., Lee, S., Ryu, J., Seo, Y., Seo, S., & Chang, D. (2017). New MEG injection system with a seabed storage tank assisted by ship transportation. Ocean Engineering, 140, 50–56. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.05.010">[Crossref]

  7. Liu, J., Zeng, L., Guo, X., Wang, P., & Dai, L. (2022). Multi-field coupling nonlinear vibration characteristics of hydraulic lifting pipe in deep-ocean mining. Applied Ocean Research, 120, 103074. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103074">[Crossref]

  8. Lutomirska, M., & Lutomirski, T. (2022). A practical case study on assessment and rehabilitation of a pipe rack. Engineering Failure Analysis, 141, 106654. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106654">[Crossref]

  9. Nguyen, D. D., Atiku, F. A., Pirouzfar, V., & Su, C.-H. (2021). Technical, economic and thermodynamic analysis for loading, storing, unloading and transporting of Ethane fluid. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 120, 218–228. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.03.035">[Crossref]

  10. Nubli, H., Sohn, J. M., & Prabowo, A. R. (2022). Layout optimization for safety evaluation on LNG-fueled ship under an accidental fuel release using mixed-integer nonlinear programming. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 14, 100443. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2022.100443">[Crossref]

  11. Nylen, J., & Sheehan, M. (2021). The impact of moisture on lead concentrate powder dust emissions in ship-loading operations. Powder Technology, 394, 353–362. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.08.069">[Crossref]

  12. Robert, D. J., Chan, D., Rajeev, P., & Kodikara, J. (2022). Effects of operational loads on buried water pipes using field tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 124, 104463.  https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104463">[Crossref]

  13. Tao, L., Chen, L., Ge, D., Yao, Y., Ruan, F., Wu, J., & Yu, J. (2022). An Integrated Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methodology for Maritime Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Based on Event Tree and Hydrodynamic Model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 108726. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108726">[Crossref]

  14. Vishnuvardhan, S., Saravanan, M., Gandhi, P., Raghava, G., Kumar, S., Khan, I. A., & Singh, P. K. (2021). Fracture studies on bi-metallic pipe weld joints under monotonic and cyclic loading. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 192, 104351. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104351">[Crossref]

  15. Wang, N., & Yuen, K. F. (2022). Resilience assessment of waterway transportation systems: Combining system performance and recovery cost. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 226, 108673.  https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108673">[Crossref]

  16. Wang, S., Qi, J., & Laporte, G. (2022). Governmental subsidy plan modeling and optimization for liquefied natural gas as fuel for maritime transportation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 155, 304–321. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.11.003">[Crossref]

  17. Widiyanto, I., Muttaqie, T., Prabowo, A. R., Hadi, S., Yaningsih, I., & Laksono, F. B. (2022). Numerical Analysis of Stiffened Offshore Pipe subjected to Environmental Loading: A Study Case using External Pressure. Procedia Structural Integrity, 41, 274–281. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.05.032">[Crossref]

  18. Yu, Z., Zeng, D., Hu, S., Zhou, X., Lu, W., Luo, J., Fan, Y., & Meng, K. (2022). The failure patterns and analysis process of drill pipes in oil and gas well: A case study of fracture S135 drill pipe. Engineering Failure Analysis, 138, 106171. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106171">[Crossref]

  19. Zahraee, S. M., Golroudbary, S. R., Shiwakoti, N., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2022). Palm oil biomass global supply chain: environmental emissions vs. technology development of maritime transportation. Procedia CIRP, 105, 817–822. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.135">[Crossref]

  20. Zhao, R., Zhou, Y., Zhang, D., & Gao, X. (2022). Numerical investigation of the hydraulic transport of coarse particles in a vertical pipe based on a fully-coupled numerical model. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 155, 104094. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104094">[Crossref]


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-10 15:42:08

No citation recorded.