DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/teknik.v35i1.6357

PENYUSUNAN SKENARIO KEBIJAKAN UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN BRT TRANS SEMARANG DENGAN PENDEKATAN SISTEM DINAMIK

*Aries Susanty  -  Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Kampus Undip Tembalang, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
Susatyo Nugroho  -  Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Kampus Undip Tembalang, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
Kumala Ade Khantari  -  Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Kampus Undip Tembalang, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

[Preparation for Policy Scenarios for Developing the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Trans Semarang with Dynamic System Approach] Related to the complexity of the problem faced by Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Trans Semarang, this research attempts to develop a framework for dynamic development of BRT Trans Semarang and provide a platform to support policy making related to performance improvement of BRT Trans Semarang. This research use system dynamics (SD) methodology. There are three scenarios constructed in this research and then a system dynamics model built based on them for the next five years. The first scenario is providing some feeder that will take the passenger on the bus, the second scenario is providing some new bus, and the third scenario is a combination of providing a number of feeders and also some new bus. There are three criteria which are used to evaluate the result of each scenario, i. e the achievement of the target of load factor (greater than 70%), the amount of total subsidy for operational of BRT, and percentage of the number of people that change their moda of transportation, from using private vehicles to BRT. The result of simulation with system dynamic indicated that scenario 1 is better than the existing condition; scenario 1 also better than scenario 2 or scenario 3. By providing some feeder, operational BRT can achieve the target of load factor at month 15, the government also does not need to issue subsidies for operational of BRT Trans Semarang, as well as the percentage of the number of people who moved from using private vehicles reached 26%.


Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Bus Rapid Transit; Trans Semarang; Metodologi Sistem Dinamik

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Artikel
Language : IND
Recent articles
PENGARUH VARIABEL OPERASI PADA PROSES MODIFIKASI PATI GARUT DENGAN METODE CROSS LINKING PENGGANTI TEPUNG TERIGU SEBAGAI BAHAN BAKU PADA INDUSTRI BAKERY PENYUSUNAN SKENARIO KEBIJAKAN UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN BRT TRANS SEMARANG DENGAN PENDEKATAN SISTEM DINAMIK OPTIMASI VARIABEL YANG PALING BERPENGARUH PADA PEMBUATAN BIODIESEL DARI MINYAK BIJI RANDU DENGAN PROSES TRANSESTERIFIKASI Ucapan Terima Kasih kepada Mitra Bebestari (Reviewer) Back-matter Front-matter More recent articles
Most cited articles
FAKTOR PEMBENTUK PERSEPSI RUANG KOMUNAL DI PEMUKIMAN NELAYAN (Studi Kasus: Pemukiman Nelayan Tambak Mulyo Semarang) KONSEP WATERFRONT PADA PERMUKIMAN ETNIS KALI SEMARANG PERENCANAAN DAN PENGANGGARAN KAMPUS BERKELANJUTAN: GREEN CAMPUS UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO POTENSI MIKROALGA SEBAGAI SUMBER BIOMASA DAN PENGEMBANGAN PRODUK TURUNANNYA TIPOLOGI DAN KONSEP INTEGRASI PADA LINGKUNGAN BANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN DENGAN KARAKTER ARSITEKTUR KOLONIAL DI JALAN KARTINI KOTA SALATIGA More cited articles
  1. Angerhofer, B. dan Angelides, C., (2000). “System Dynamics Modelling in Supply Chain Management: Research Review”, Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, UK
  2. Baltes M.R., (2003). “The Importance Customers Place on Specific Service Elements of Bus Rapid”, Journal of Public Transportation, 6 (4), hal.1-19
  3. BLU UPTD Terminal Mangkang, (2011). “Pengelolaan BRT Kota Semarang”, Laporan Internal, Semarang
  4. Eboli, L. dan Gabriella M., (2007). “Service Quality Attributes Affecting Customer Satisfaction for Bus Transit”. Journal of Public Transportation, 10 (3), hal. 21-34
  5. Galicia, D.L dan Cheu, R.L., (2010). “A System Dynamics Model for Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Planning and Ridership Forecasting”, Prosiding of the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Board, 10-14 Januari 2010, Washington DC, hal.81-88
  6. Mahmoudi M., Verdinejad F., Jandaghi Gh., dan Mokhtari M. A., (2010). “Analysis and Establishment of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Customer Satisfaction in Tehran”, African Journal of Business Management, 4 (12), hal. 2514-2519
  7. Mess, P., Patrick M., John S., dan Michael, B., (2006), “Putting the Public Interest Back Into Public Transport: A Report to the Victorian Community”, Laporan Penelitian, University of Melbourne, Monash Universit, Swinburne University, RMIT University, Melbourne
  8. Oyesiku, K., Odufuwa, F., dan Somuyiwa, B., (2009). “Passengers’ Satisfaction, Sriver and Bus scheduling: the Case of Lagos Metropolis Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Scheme”, Prosiding 11th International Conference on Advanced Systems for Public Transport (CASPT 2009), Department of Civil Engineering The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, hal. 2-17
  9. Putri, K. R, (2012). “Analisis Kesediaan Membayar Pelanggan dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas dan Kuantitas Pelayanan (Studi Kasus Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Koridor 1 Mangkang-Penggaron, Semarang)”, Tugas Akhir, Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
  10. Rini, I. N. P., (2007). “Analisis Persepsi Penumpang terhadap Tingkat Pelayanan Bus Way (Studi Kasus Bus way Trans Jakarta Koridor 1)”. Thesis, Program Pasca Sarjana Teknik Sipil, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
  11. Rizkiyah, I., (2012). “Analisis Pengaruh Variabel Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan BRT Semarang Menggunakan Multiple Linier Regression (Studi Kasus Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Koridor 1 Mangkang-Penggaron, Semarang)”. Tugas Akhir, Program Studi Teknik Industri Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
  12. Sterman, D., (2000). “Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World”, McGraw Hill, Boston
  13. Thomas, E. (2000). “Bus Rapit Transit”, Presentation at the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Annual Meeting, Chicago
  14. Wright, H (2007). “Bus Rapit Transit Planning Guide”, Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP), New York

Last update:

  1. Analysis of public transport users’ satisfaction using importance performance analysis (IPA) methods: Trans Padang case study

    Bayu Budi Irawan, Momon Momon, Winda Fitria, Laela Susdiani, Dodi Arian. 3RD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE 2022 (CITES2022): Innovation in Technology and Science for New Era of Engineering Professionalism, 2891 , 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0208034

  2. Conflict Management in the Operation of Trans Padang Corridor VI

    Palzi Palzi, Yuliarti Yuliarti. Railway Journal, 1 (1), 2024. doi: 10.47134/railway.v1i1.2339

Last update: 2024-11-22 20:06:32

No citation recorded.