BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JAA20483, author = {Haryanto Haryanto}, title = {PENGARUH FRAMING DAN URUTAN BUKTI TERHADAP AUDIT JUDGMENT: KOMPARASI DAN INTERAKSI KEPUTUSAN INDIVIDU-KELOMPOK}, journal = {JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING}, volume = {15}, number = {1}, year = {2018}, keywords = {Compare, types of decision maker, framing, order effect, audit judgment, the auditor}, abstract = { This study aims to compare type of decision maker (individual-group) on the influence of framing and order effect for making an audit judgment by the auditor. A laboratory experiment approach with 120 auditors from The Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia) as participants used to hypothesis testing. The results show that framing influences an audit judgment, and the interaction between framing and type of decision-maker affects on audit judgment. The study also shows that the order effect factor influences audit judgment. The interaction between the order of evidence and the type of decision-maker also occurs, which indicates a decision shift of individual-group in influencing an audit judgment. Consistent with several previous studies, the group's decision is in line and greater or smaller then individual decision has been made previously. }, issn = {2549-7650}, pages = {1--36} doi = {10.14710/jaa.15.1.1-36}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/akuditi/article/view/20483} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This study aims to compare type of decision maker (individual-group) on the influence offraming and order effect for making an audit judgment by the auditor. A laboratoryexperiment approach with 120 auditors from The Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia(Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia) as participants used to hypothesistesting. The results show that framing influences an audit judgment, and the interactionbetween framing and type of decision-maker affects on audit judgment. The study alsoshows that the order effect factor influences audit judgment. The interaction between theorder of evidence and the type of decision-maker also occurs, which indicates a decisionshift of individual-group in influencing an audit judgment. Consistent with several previousstudies, the group's decision is in line and greater or smaller then individual decision hasbeen made previously.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-12-29 22:12:32
Editorial Office of Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing, Department of AccountingFaculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro UniversityJalan Prof. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 50275Telp.: +62 24-76486843Email: jaa@live.undip.ac.id