skip to main content

Gossip: Struktur, Peran dan Praktek

*Dwi Wulandari orcid  -  Program Studi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang Jl. dr. Antonius Suroyo, Kampus Tembalang Semarang –50275, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2023 Endogami: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Antropologi under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This  theoretical study aims at finding out the structure, role and how people do gossiping within different culture. As in conversation, gossip is also performed by both males and females in many different cultures.  It is understood that the nature of gossip done by females is different compared to those done by males, although many argue that gossiping is identical with females’ language behaviors. Gossip is mostly performed in the form f negative evaluation. Nevertheless, gossip can also be neutral, in that it only talks about facts, or it can even be  in the form of positive evaluation that is gossiping the goodness of the third party. Gossip has its own nature and structure that differentiate it with the other type of conversation. Gossip also has its social functions; as social control, as capital symbol in social transaction , and to construct and to keep social identity. Gossiping behavior is influenced by local norm and culture. With that reason, although in general there are similar nature and role of gossip throughout different cultures, in reality there are also differences on gossiping behavior.  

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Gossip; evaluative; norm; social control

Article Metrics:

  1. Bertolotti, T. & Magnani, L. 2014. An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip-based knowledge. Synthese. Vol. 191 (7) pp. 4037-4067
  2. Besnier, N. 2009. Gossip and Everyday Production of Politics. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press
  3. Brenneis, D. 1984. Grog and Gossip in Bhatgaon: Style and Substance in Fiji Indian Conversation. American Ethnologist . Vol. 11 (3). pp. 487-506
  4. Capp, B., 2004. When Gossip Meet Women, Family, and Neighbourhood in Early Modern England. Oxford University Press
  5. Eggins, S and Diana Slade. 1997.Analysing Casual Conversation. London and Washington: Cassell
  6. Ferreira, V.A, 2014. Gossip as indirect mockery in friendly conversation: The social functions of 'sharing a laugh' at third parties. Discourse Studies. Vol. 16, (5) pp. 607-628
  7. Guendouzi, J. 2001. 'You'll think we're always bitching': the functions of cooperativity and competition in women's gossip. Discourse Studies . Vol. 3 (1) pp. 29-51
  8. Holmes, J. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge publisher
  9. Jaworsky, A. & Coupland, J. 2005. Othering in gossip: “you go out have a laugh and you can pull yeah okay but like…”. Language in Society. Vol.34 (5). p. 667 - 694
  10. Lestari, P.M. 2019. Struktur, Pilihan Kode, dan Karakteristik Ngrasani oleh Wanita Jawa dalam Interaksi Sosial di Kabupaten Klaten. Disertasi UNS yang tidak dipublikasikan
  11. McDonald, K.L., Putallaz, M., Grimes, C.L., Kupersmidt, J.N., & Coie, J.D. 2007. Girl talk: Gossip, friendship, and sociometric status. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, SPECIAL ISSUE: Gender and Friendship. Vol. 53 (3). p. 381 - 411
  12. Robinson, B. 2016. Character, Caricature, and Gossip. The Monist. Vol. 99 (2). p. 198- 211
  13. Rosnow, R.L. 2001. Rumor and gosip in interpersonal interaction and beyond: A social exchange perspective. In R.M. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving Badly: Aversive Behaviors in Interpersonal Relationship. p. 203 - 232. American Psychological Association
  14. Santosa, R. 2021. Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif Kebahasaan. Surakarta. UNS Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-16 08:17:13

No citation recorded.