WHY DO SPATIAL DATA AND INFORMATION HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN SPATIAL PLANNING PROCESS? THE INVESTIGATION OF SPATIAL DATA AND INFORMATION USAGE IN INDONESIAN SPATIAL PLANNING POLICIES

*Adipandang Yudono  -  University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Received: 7 Aug 2017; Published: 25 Apr 2018.
Open Access License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
Abstract
In spatial planning processes, the different aspects of human interactions involving political circumstances, social, economics, historical and cultural objectives can be understood through maps or spatial visualisations, because those media can illustrate abstract phenomena into visual images. Spatial data has a role to play in spatial governance by providing thematic spatial information and analysis at all authority scales. Furthermore, spatial data and information are prerequisites for any participation in planning deliberation helping to create consensus. Spatial data and information currently have a role in communicating with all stakeholders (i.e. local authorities, private sectors and communities) whose interests are in development proposals in particular areas in order to decide implementation, priorities in local geographical areas. This paper investigates the role of spatial data and information in Indonesian spatial planning process using archival research method. The empirical studies take a qualitative approach in analysing the results of data collection from fieldwork observation through collecting legal documents and internal institutional reports. Synchronization and consistency between development plan and spatial plan must be ensured in every interrelated spatial policy, so that the various implementation efforts do not lead to conflict. Furthermore, spatial data and information has a crucial role in translating the development strategies into the implementation of the development programme for the implementation of the government's agenda.
Keywords: Spatial data; spatial information; development plan; spatial planning

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
In Vol 5, No 1 (2018): (April 2018)
Statistics: 1113 110
Related articles
SPATIAL VARIETY AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRADITIONAL MARKETS IN SURAKARTA AS POTENTIAL FACTORS IN IMPROVING SPATIAL-BASED MANAGEMENT SLUM REVITALIZING PLAN OF BAGHDADIYAH BY SPATIAL RE-MODELING CONFIGURATION POLA KERUANGAN PENYAKIT MENULAR (DBD) KOTA SEMARANG SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF SURAKARTA’S PERIPHERAL RURAL VILLAGES UNDER IN-SITU URBANIZATION PHENOMENON : THE CASE OF GENTAN VILLAGE A GIS-BASED TSUNAMI EVACUATION MODEL CONSIDERING LAND COVER AND SPATIAL CONFIGURATION (CASE OF PURWOREJO REGENCY, INDONESIA) ACCURACY ASSESSMENTS OF PAN-SHARPENED IMAGE FOR BENTHIC HABITATS MAPPING

  1. Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG), (2014), The Head of BIG Regulation No. 6 of 2014, Tata Cara Konsultasi Penyusunan Peta Rencana Tata Ruang (Procedure for Spatial Plan Formulation supervision).

  2. Campbell, H., & Masser, I. (1995). GIS In Organizations: How Effective Are GIS In Practice? CRC Press.

  3. Chadwick, G. (1971). A systems view of planning: towards a theory of the urban and regional planing process.

  4. Clarke, G. (1992). Towards appropriate forms of urban spatial planning. Habitat International, 16(2), 149–165. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(92)90045-z">Crossref]

  5. Dühr, S. (2006). The Visual Language of Spatial Planning. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965818">Crossref]

  6. Faludi, A. (2000). The Performance of Spatial Planning. Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), 299–318. [https://doi.org/10.1080/713691907">Crossref] 

  7. Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the Face of Power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(1), 67–80. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167">Crossref] 

  8. Hall, P. (2010). Urban and Regional Planning. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861424">Crossref] 

  9. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. UBc Press. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2">Crossref] 

  10. Government Regulation. 2008. PP No.26/2008 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Nasional.

  11. (INDII), I. I. I. (2010). GIS for Infrastructure Development Recommendation for Bappenas. The Project Report designed to promote economic growth in Indonesia by enhancing the relevance, quality and quantum of infrastructure investment funed by an Australian Government.

  12. Masson-Vincent, M. (2008). Governance and geography explaining the importance of regional planning to citizens, stakeholders in their living space. Boletin de La Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, (46), 77–95.

  13. McLoughlin, J. B. (1969). Urban & regional planning: a systems approach. London, UK: Faber and Faber.

  14. Meadowcroft, J. (2002). Planning for sustainable development: what can be learned from the critics? In Planning sustainability (pp. 22–48). Routledge.

  15. The Ministry of Home Affairs. (2017). National Medium Term Development Plan 2005-2031. State Secretariat.

  16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, J. (MLIT) (2017). An Overvier of Spatial Policy in Asian and Euroan Countries.

  17. Rizal, K. (2008). Mensinkronkan perencanaan pembangunan dan perencanaan keruangan di Indonesia pola hubungan sistem perencanaan pembangunan nasional (uu no. 25/2004) dengan sistem penataan ruang (uu no. 26/2007) (Synchronizing Development System and Spatial Planning System. Working paper prepared in Ministry of National Planning and Development, Jakarta, Indonesia.

  18. Robbins, E., & Cullinan, E. (1996). ARCHITECTURE Why Architects Draw, Edward Robbins. 1994. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 300 pages. ISBN: 0-262-18157-6.39.95. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 16(1–2), 63–64. [https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769601600117">Crossref] 

  19. Stephenson, J. (2010). People and Place. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(1), 9–21. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903549878">Crossref]

  20. Vincent, M.M, (2008), Governance and Geography Explaining The Importance of Regional Planning to Citizens, Stakeholders in Their Living Space, Boletin de la A.G.E.N, No.46,  pp. 77-95.

  21. Yudono, A, (2006), Teknologi, Informasi dan Perencanaan di Indonesia: Quo Vadis One Map Policy? (Technology, Information and Planning in Indonesia: Quo Vadis One Map Policy?), LSC Insight-The Contemporary Policy Issues in Indonesia, Vol.1, No.10.

  22.  


Last update: 2021-01-23 18:45:36

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-01-23 18:45:36

No citation recorded.
Copyright (c) 2018 GJGP-UNDIP License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0