skip to main content

Reclassification of Urban Growth in Rural Area, Temanggung Regency, Indonesia

*Holi Bina Wijaya orcid scopus  -  Departemen of Urban and Regional Planning, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Imam Buchori orcid  -  Departemen of Urban and Regional Planning, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Reclassification is part of urban growth together with the natural growth of birth and death, and migration from rural to urban areas. However, the reclassification has a deficiency in studies due to the urban growth discourses have much focused on the central force of existing urbanized areas. Historical data shows that the economic growth in urban areas is more due to a residual increase from migration growth and reclassification rather than natural growth. This paper contributes to the empirical context of the phenomenon of reclassification of urban growth and its following spatial changes in the rural area of Temanggung regency, Indonesia. The study utilizes the comparison analysis by examining the growth of industrial employment as an urban activity in rural areas, as well as looking at this relationship with changes in the physical built-up area as an indication of the urbanization process. This study found that the reclassification in Temanggung regency has encouraged urbanization in rural areas, through the development of industrial activities based on local resources and labor and promoted economic growth in rural areas. The reclassification that occurs is mostly due to the wood products manufacturing business that has been supported by the potential resources, and local workforce, rather than the active role of the government institution.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Reclassification; Rural Development; Rural Urbanization; Urban Growth
Funding: Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, Indonesia

Article Metrics:

  1. Bocquier, P., & Costa, R. (2015). Which transition comes first? Urban and demographic transitions in Belgium and Sweden. Demographic Research33(December 2015), 1297–1332. [https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.48">Crossref]

  2. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2010). Klasifikasi Perkotaan dan Perdesaan di Indonesia. In Badan Pusat Statisistik Republik Indonesia.

  3. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2020). Klasifikasi Perkotaan dan Perdesaan di Indonesia.

  4. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2021). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2021. In Statistik Indonesia 2020 (Vol. 1101001).

  5. BPS-Statistics of Jawa Tengah Province. (2015). Jawa Tengah in Figures 2015.

  6. BPS. (2021). Berita Resmi Statistik: Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. In BPS.

  7. BPS - Statistics of Temanggung Regency. (1990). Temanggung Regency in Figures 1990.

  8. BPS - Statistics of Temanggung Regency. (2000). Temanggung Regency in Figures 2000.

  9. BPS - Statistics of Temanggung Regency. (2010). Temanggung Regency in Figures 2010.

  10. BPS - Statistics of Temanggung Regency. (2020). Temanggung Regency in Figures 2020

  11. BPS - Statistics of Temanggung Regency. (2021). Temanggung Regency in Figures 2021.

  12. Brenner, N. (2013). Theses on Urbanization. Public Culture25(1), 85–114. [https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1890477">Crossref

  13. Buchori, I., Rahmayana, L., Pangi, P., Pramitasari, A., Sejati, A. W., Basuki, Y., & Bramiana, C. N. (2021). In situ urbanization-driven industrial activities: the Pringapus enclave on the rural-urban fringe of Semarang Metropolitan Region, Indonesia. International Journal of Urban Sciences0(0), 1–24. [https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1925141">Crossref

  14. Dyson, T. (2011). The Role of the Demographic Transition in the Process of Urbanization. Population and Development Review37(SUPPL. 1), 34–54. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00377.x">Crossref]

  15. Farrell, H., & Knight, J. (2003). Trust, Institutions, and Institutional Change: Industrial Districts and the Social Capital Hypothesis. Politics and Society31(4), 537–566. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329203256954">Crossref

  16. Farrell, K. (2017). The rapid urban growth Triad: A new conceptual framework for examining the urban transition in developing countries. Sustainability (Switzerland)9(8), 1–19. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081407">Crossref

  17. Farrell, K., & Westlund, H. (2018). China’s rapid urban ascent: an examination into the components of urban growth. Asian Geographer35(1), 85–106. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2018.1476256">Crossref

  18. Fichera, C. R., Modica, G., & Pollino, M. (2012). Land Cover classification and change-detection analysis using multi-temporal remote sensed imagery and landscape metrics. European Journal of Remote Sensing45(1), 1–18. [https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20124501">Crossref

  19. Firman, T. (2017). The urbanisation of Java, 2000–2010: towards ‘the island of mega-urban regions.’ Asian Population Studies13(1), 50–66. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2016.1247587">Crossref

  20. Goldstein, S. (1990). Urbanization in China, 1982-87: effects of migration and reclassification. Population & Development Review16(4), 673–701. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1972962">Crossref

  21. Gross, J., & Ouyang, Y. (2021). Types of urbanization and economic growth. International Journal of Urban Sciences25(1), 71–85. [https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1759447">Crossref

  22. Handayani, W. (2013). Rural-urban transition in Central Java: Population and economic structural changes based on cluster analysis. Land2(3), 419–436. [https://doi.org/10.3390/land2030419">Crossref

  23. Harris, J. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1970). Migration , Unemployment and Developmnent : A Two-Sector Analysis. The American Economic Review60(1), 126–142. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1807860">Crossref]

  24. Jedwab, R., Christiaensen, L., & Gindelsky, M. (2014). Rural Push , Urban Pull and ... Urban Push ? New Historical Evidence from Developing Countries. (January). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.09.002">Crossref]

  25. Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2018). Determinants of Urban Growth during Demographic and Mobility Transitions: Evidence from India, Mexico, and the US. Population and Development Review44(2), 363–389. [https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12150">Crossref

  26. Jones, B., Balk, D., & Leyk, S. (2020). Urban change in the United States, 1990-2010: A Spatial Assessment of Administrative Reclassification. Sustainability (Switzerland)12(4), 1–20. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041649">Crossref]  

  27. Kulcsár, L. J., & Brown, D. L. (2011). The Political Economy of Urban Reclassification in Post-Socialist Hungary. Regional Studies45(4), 479–490. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903496378">Crossref

  28. Law of Village. , Pub. L. No. 6 (2014).

  29. Li Gan, Qing He, Ruichao Si, D. Y. (2016). Relocating of Redefined: A New Perspective on Urbanization in China. [https://www.nber.org/papers/w26585">Crossref]

  30. Li, Y., Long, H., & Liu, Y. (2010). Industrial development and land use/cover change and their effects on local environment: A case study of Changshu in eastern coastal China. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China4(4), 438–448. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0273-3">Crossref

  31. Liu, Y. (2018). Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China. Land Use Policy74(December 2017), 1–4. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.032">Crossref

  32. Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2017). Conversion from rural settlements and arable land under rapid urbanization in Beijing during 1985 e 2010. Journal of Rural Studies51, 141–150. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.008">Crossref

  33. Long, H., Zou, J., Pykett, J., & Li, Y. (2011). Analysis of rural transformation development in China since the turn of the new millennium. Applied Geography31(3), 1094–1105. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.006">Crossref

  34. McGee, T. G. (2009). The Spatiality of Urbanization: The Policy Challenges of Mega-Urban and Desakota Regions of Southeast Asia. UNU-IAS Working Paper, (161), 1–40. [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.548.2985">Crossref]

  35. Mezgebo, T. G., & Porter, C. (2020). From rural to urban, but not through migration: Household livelihood responses to urban reclassification in northern Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies29(2), 173–191. [https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejz020">Crossref

  36. National Research Council. (2003). Cities Transformed: Demographic Change and Its Implications in the Developing World. In R. E. Montgomery, R. Stren, B. Cohen, & H. E. Reed (Eds.), Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315065700">Crossref]

  37. Preston, S. H. (1979). Urban growth in developing countries: a demographic reappraisal. Population and Development Review5(2), 195–216. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1971823">Crossref

  38. Ravallion, M., Chen, S., & Sangraula, P. (2007). New Evidence on the Urbanization of Global Poverty. Population and Development Review33(4), 667–701. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00193.x">Crossref

  39. Setyono, J. S., Yunus, H. S., & Giyarsih, S. R. (2016). The Spatial Pattern of Urbanization and Small Cities Development in Central Java: A Case Study of Semarang-Yogyakarta-Surakarta Region. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning3(1), 53–66. [https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.3.1.53-66">Crossref

  40. Simon, D., Mcgregor, D., & Nsiah-Gyabaah, K. (2004). The Changing Urban – Rural Definitional Issues and an Application to Kumasi , Ghana. Environment and Urbanization16(2), 235–248. [https://doi.org/10.1177%2F095624780401600214">Crossref]

  41. Tewabe, D., & Fentahun, T. (2020). Assessing land use and land cover change detection using remote sensing in the Lake Tana Basin, Northwest Ethiopia. Cogent Environmental Science6(1). [https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1778998">Crossref

  42. UN DESA. (2001). The Components of Urban Growth in Developing Countries.

  43. UN DESA. (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). In Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. [https://doi.org/10.18356/b9e995fe-en">Crossref

  44. UN DESA. (2021). In Situ Urbanization Key to Leaving No One Behind. [https://doi.org/10.18356/27081990-104">Crossref

  45. United Nations. New Urban Agenda. , Pub. L. No. A/RES/71/256, 48 (2017).

  46. Yang, Z., & Li, C. (2020). Spatial and temporal characteristics of rurality in urban suburb town and its driving factors based on land use transformation. Complexity2020. [https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2806127">Crossref

  47. Yang, Z., Shen, N., Qu, Y., & Zhang,  and B. (2021). Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China. [https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111228">Crossref]

  48. Zhu, Y. (2004). Changing urbanization processes and in situ rural–urban transformation: Reflections on China’s settlement definitions. In T. Champion & G. Hugo (Eds.), New Forms of Urbanization: Beyond the Urban-Rural Dichotomy (pp. 207–228). Ashgate Publishing. [https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315248073-11/changing-urbanization-processes-situ-rural-urban-transformation-reflections-china-settlement-definitions-yu-zhu">Crossref]

  49. Zhu, Y. (2017). In Situ Urbanization in China: Processes, Contributing Factors, and Policy Implications. China Population and Development Studies1(1), 45–66. [https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03500917">Crossref

  50.  


Last update:

  1. Component Driven of Regional Competitiveness for Urban Development in Central Java Province Indonesia.

    M Indra Hadi Wijaya, Holi Bina Wijaya, M Sakdi, Hafzi Nur Azmi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1264 (1), 2023. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1264/1/012034
  2. Participation of Business Actors in Implementing Circular Economy on Batik Products in Kauman Batik Kampoeng, Pekalongan City

    Muhammad Indra Hadi Wijaya, Tuti Fadiyah, Holi Bina Wijaya, Artiningsih Artiningsih. TATALOKA, 26 (3), 2024. doi: 10.14710/tataloka.26.3.208-217

Last update: 2024-11-20 22:05:04

No citation recorded.