skip to main content

Agroforestry-Silvopastoral Systems Suitability for the Plateau Landforms: Devrekani Plateau (Northern Turkiye)

*Celalettin Duran scopus  -  Department of Geography, Kastamonu University, Kuzeykent, Kastamonu, Turkiye 37150, Turkey

Citation Format:
Abstract

The Devrekani Plateau, located in the Kure Mountains massif (Kastamonu-Türkiye), is a geomorphological unit with flat areas ranging between 1000 and 1300 meters in altitude. Agriculture, animal husbandry, and forestry activities are standard on the plateau. Due to environmental constraints, versatile, holistic, and sustainable land use plans are needed in such high areas. This study examines land use patterns compatible with natural environmental conditions for the Plateau Landforms. Agroforestry-silvopastoral systems where agriculture, pasture, forest lands, and recreational functions are applied together have been evaluated in the study area. Criteria that have a high relationship with land use have been identified. Using Geographic Information Systems, weighted overlay analysis was carried out with factor maps regarding Lithology, Slope, Elevation, and Actual Land Use. The model output reveals that the regions between agriculture and forest are the most suitable for the agroforestry-silvopastoral systems (outside urban areas) and recreation. The most suitable areas for mixed land use plans on the plateau are generally karst areas with sparse vegetation, located above 1200 meters, and having a 6-12% slope. The lower border of these areas is agricultural areas with flat or nearly flat slopes, commonly formed by alluviums. The upper limit consists of forest areas with steep slopes surrounded by high hills. Implementing agroforestry-silvopastoral land use models on plateau landforms can be an effective strategy for sustainable environmental management and land use.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Plateau; Agroforestry-Silvopastoral Systems; Land Use; Suitability; Devrekani

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahmad, F., & Goparaju, L. (2017). Geospatial Approach for Agroforestry Suitability Mapping: To Enhance Livelihood and Reduce Poverty, FAO based Documented Procedure (Case Study of Dumka District, Jharkhand, India). Biosciences, Biotechnology Research Asia, 14(2), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2491">[Crossref]

  2. Ahmad, F., Uddin, M. M., & Goparaju, L. (2019). Agroforestry suitability mapping of India: geospatial approach based on FAO guidelines. Agroforestry Systems, 93(4), 1319–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0233-7">[Crossref]

  3. Ayberk, S., Angeli, A., & Çolak, I. (1996). Melez (I-214) ve karakavak (Gazi) ağaçlandırmalarında karma ormancılık tekniklerinin uygulanması üzerine araştırmalar. Kavak ve Hızlı Gelişen Tür Orman Ağaçları Araştırma Enstitüsü Teknik Bülten, 175, 1–16.

  4. Bijalwan, A., Upadhyay, A. P., & Dobriyal, M. J. R. (2015). International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology. Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol, 2(6), 214–217.

  5. Birhanu, L., Hailu, B. T., Bekele, T., & Demissew, S. (2019). Land use/land cover change along elevation and slope gradient in highlands of Ethiopia. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 16, 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100260">[Crossref]

  6. Chará, J., Reyes, E., Peri, P., Otte, J., Arce, E., & Schneider, F. (2019). Silvopastoral Systems and their Contribution to Improved Resource Use and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): Evidence from Latin America.

  7. Chebli, Y., El Otmani, S., Elame, F., Moula, N., Chentouf, M., Hornick, J.-L., & Cabaraux, J.-F. (2021). Silvopastoral System in Morocco: Focus on Their Importance, Strategic Functions, and Recent Changes in the Mediterranean Side. Sustainability, 13(19), 10744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910744">[Crossref]

  8. Coomes, D. A., & Allen, R. B. (2007). Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth. Journal of Ecology, 95(5), 1084–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01280.x">[Crossref]

  9. Dan, N. N., Ping, L. G., & Lang, L. P. C. (2018). Land Unit Mapping and Evaluation of Land Suitability for Agro – forestrye in Thua Thien Hue province – VietNam as an Example. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 159(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/159/1/012012">[Crossref]

  10. Duran, C, & Aygun, M. (2017). Some topographic properties of Devrekani Plateau in Kastamonu (Northern Turkey). Proceeding Book UJES (International Symposium on Geomorphology), 88–97.

  11. Duran, Celalettin. (2013). The role of mountainous areas on plant diversity of Turkey. BIBAD, Biyoloji Bilimleri Araștırma Dergisi, 6(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/http:/www.nobel.gen.tr/Makaleler/B%c4%b0BAD-Issue%201-5ec0c1b17da54b338464331f17555c3d.pdf">[Crossref]

  12. El Baroudy, A. A. (2016). Mapping and evaluating land suitability using a GIS-based model. CATENA, 140, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.12.010">[Crossref]

  13. Erinc, S. (1993). Physical Geography of Turkey. Institute of Marine Science and Geography Bulletin, 1–10.

  14. FAO. (2022). Agroforestry. FAO. https://www.fao.org/agroforestry

  15. Fidan, C., Taşdemir, C., Karatay, H., Duran, C., & Kalkan, B. (2007). Bozuk meşe baltalıklarının rehabilitasyonu ve silvopastoral amaçlı kullanım olanakları. Güneydoğu Anadolu Orman Araştırma Enstitüsü Bülteni, 12.

  16. Filiz, S., & Tolunay, A. (2003). Agroforestry practices and useful plant species in agroforestry practices for Isparta province. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 4(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.18182/tjf.35116">[Crossref]

  17. Gabriel, S. (2018). Silvopasture: A guide to managing grazing animals, forage crops, and trees in a temperate farm ecosystem. Chelsea Green Publishing.

  18. Geray, U., & Göreceliouglu, E. (1993). Tarım ve orman arazileri kullanımında karma sistemleri. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 33(1), 173–200.

  19. Gülersoy, A. E., & Buldan, I. (2020). Relationships between geological-lithological characteristics and land-use in Gömec Plain & immediate surroundings (Balikesir).

  20. Harita Genel Müdürlüğü. (2010). 1:25.000 scale topographical maps of Kastamonu,. Harita Genel Müdürlüğü.

  21. Herzberg, R., Pham, T. G., Kappas, M., Wyss, D., & Tran, C. T. M. (2019). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Land Evaluation of Potential Agricultural Land Use Types in a Hilly Area of Central Vietnam. Land, 8(6), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8060090">[Crossref]

  22. Johnson, P. (2011). Topographies of Urbanization: Survey in and around Pompeiopolis. Pompeipolis I, Içinde, 195–245.

  23. Jose, S., & Dollinger, J. (2019). Silvopasture: a sustainable livestock production system. Agroforestry Systems, 93(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00366-8">[Crossref]

  24. Jose, S., Walter, D., & Mohan Kumar, B. (2019). Ecological considerations in sustainable silvopasture design and management. Agroforestry Systems, 93(1), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0065-2">[Crossref]

  25. Joshi, P. (2023). Silvopasture: a Sustainable Agro-Systems Practice for Rural Farmers. Agriculture Extension in Developing Countries, 1(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.26480/aedc.02.2023.46.48">[Crossref]

  26. Kantarci, M. D. (2005). Forest Ecosystems. Istanbul University Forest Faculty.

  27. Kennedy, W. J., Tunoğlu, C., Walaszczyk, I., & Kadri Ertekín, İ. (2007). Ammonite and inoceramid bivalve faunas from the Davutlar Formation of the Devrekani–Kastamonu area, northern Turkey, and their biostratigraphical significance. Cretaceous Research, 28(6), 861–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2006.12.007">[Crossref]

  28. Ketin, I. (1966). Tectonic units of Anatolia. Bull. Miner. Res. Exp., 66, 23–34.

  29. Kurter, A. (1971). The Climate of Kastamonu and its surroundings. Istanbul University Faculty of Letters pub. 1627-62,.

  30. Kurter, A. (1982). Natural View of Kastamonu and it’s sorroundings. Istanbul University Faculty of Letters pub. 2930.

  31. Lisso, L., Lindsay, J. B., & Berg, A. (2024). Evaluating the Topographic Factors for Land Suitability Mapping of Specialty Crops in Southern Ontario. Agronomy, 14(2), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14020319">[Crossref]

  32. Nair, P. K. R., Kumar, B. M., & Nair, V. D. (2021). Silvopastoral Systems (SPS) in the Tropics and Subtropics. In An Introduction to Agroforestry (pp. 169–193). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_9">[Crossref]

  33. Nath, A. J., Kumar, R., Devi, N. B., Rocky, P., Giri, K., Sahoo, U. K., Bajpai, R. K., Sahu, N., & Pandey, R. (2021). Agroforestry land suitability analysis in the Eastern Indian Himalayan region. Environmental Challenges, 4, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100199">[Crossref]

  34. Nath, A. J., Sahoo, U. K., Giri, K., Sileshi, G. W., & Das, A. K. (2020). Incentivizing Hill Farmers for Promoting Agroforestry as an Alternative to Shifting Cultivation in Northeast India. In Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes (pp. 425–444). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_14">[Crossref]

  35. Ok, K. (2019). Karma Ormancılık Üretim Sistemleri ve Türkiye’nin Kırsal Kalkınma Sorunu. ResearchGate.

  36. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü. (2020). 1:25.000 scale stand types maps of Kastamonu. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü (OGM).

  37. Puri, S., & Nair, P. K. R. (2004). Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agroforestry Systems, 6162(1–3), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029014.66729.e0">[Crossref]

  38. Smith, M. M., Bentrup, G., Kellerman, T., MacFarland, K., Straight, R., Ameyaw, Lord, & Stein, S. (2022). Silvopasture in the USA: A systematic review of natural resource professional and producer-reported benefits, challenges, and management activities. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 326, 107818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107818">[Crossref]

  39. Solorio, S. F. J., Wright, J., Franco, M. J. A., Basu, S. K., Sarabia, S. L., Ramírez, L., Ayala, B. A., Aguilar, P. C., & Ku, V. J. C. (2017). Silvopastoral Systems: Best Agroecological Practice for Resilient Production Systems Under Dryland and Drought Conditions. In Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability (pp. 233–250). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_11">[Crossref]

  40. Soni, M. L., Subbulakshmi, V., Yadava, N. D., Tewari, J. C., & Dagar, J. C. (2016). Silvopastoral agroforestry systems: lifeline for dry regions. Agroforestry Research Developments. Nova Publishers, New York, 245–305.

  41. Steiner, A. (2012). Agroforestry and the Transition to the Future. In Agroforestry-The Future of Global Land Use (pp. 17–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_5">[Crossref]

  42. Turna, I., & Ayaz, H. (2001). Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesinde Ekolojik Dengenin Sürdürülmesinde Agroforestry Önemi ve Uygulama Olanakları. Ulusal Ormanc{i}l{i}k Kongresi, Kongre Serisi, 1, 364–372.

  43. Uzun, A. (2004). Koru Polje and karst landform evolution in the middle part of the Kure Mountains, Northern Anatolia, Turkey.

  44. Wu, L., Yang, Y., Yang, H., Xie, B., & Luo, W. (2023). A Comparative Study on Land Use/Land Cover Change and Topographic Gradient Effect between Mountains and Flatlands of Southwest China. Land, 12(6), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061242">[Crossref]

  45. Yadav, A., Gendley, M. K., Sahu, J., Patel, P. K., Chandraker, K., & Dubey, A. (2019). Silvopastoral system: a prototype of livestock agroforestry. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 8(2), 76–82.

  46. Yücel, T. (1988). Main topographic elements of the Western Black Sea region. Journal of Geographical Research, 11, 1–8.


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-22 22:00:38

No citation recorded.