DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.14.2.269-298

WHO BEARS THE BURDEN? GENDER, CONTRACEPTIVE RESPONSIBILITY, AND THE LEGAL REGULATION OF REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE IN INDONESIA

*Heni Widiyani  -  Department of Law, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Indonesia
Nikodemus Niko  -  Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
Merlin Swantamalo Magna  -  Trade Management Study Program, Vocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Ayu Efritadewi  -  Department of Law, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines how gender relations, cultural norms, religious beliefs, and state intervention shape contraceptive responsibility and reproductive choice in Indonesia. It focuses on gender imbalance in family planning, in which women bear the social and moral burden of contraception, while men remain marginally involved. Drawing on socio-legal analysis, feminist theory, and Michel Foucault’s concept of biopower, the study analyses legislation, policy debates, historical developments, and scholarship, with particular attention to Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 and recent controversies concerning contraceptive access and vasectomy. The findings show that contraception in Indonesia is not merely a matter of medical choice, but a contested field structured by patriarchy, religious interpretation, cultural expectations, healthcare systems, and population policy. Women’s reproductive decisions are frequently influenced by husbands, medical authorities, and state programmes, while male contraceptive participation remains limited by narrow method availability and dominant ideals of masculinity. The regulation of adolescent access to contraception further reveals tensions between reproductive health, moral governance, abstinence, and cultural values. Through a biopolitical lens, family planning emerges as both a public health instrument and a mechanism for managing population, productivity, and social order. The study argues that reproductive autonomy cannot be realised through expanded contraceptive availability alone. Effective reform requires gender-responsive policies that promote meaningful male participation, safeguard informed and voluntary choice, address coercive and patriarchal decision-making, and recognise Indonesia’s diverse social, religious, and cultural contexts. Responsibility for contraception must therefore be understood as shared, negotiated, and grounded in individual rights rather than assigned predominantly to women.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Contraception; Family Planning; Gender; Reproductive Health; State Policy

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Pembangunan Hukum Negara dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Perspektif Hukum Progresif Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan Arsenal Hukum Progresif More cited articles
  1. Adawiyah, Robiatul. ‘Pemakaian Kontrasepsi Bukan Cuma Urusan Perempuan, Tapi Juga Laki-Laki’. Konde.Co, 30 June 2022. https://www.konde.co/2022/06/pemakaian-kontrasepsi-bukan-cuma-urusan-perempuan-tapi-juga-laki-laki/
  2. Adawiyah, Robiatul. ‘Sadarkah Kita Bahwa Implementasi KB Timpang Gender Dan Diskriminatif Terhadap Perempuan’. The Conversation, 29 June 2022. https://theconversation.com/sadarkah-kita-bahwa-implementasi-kb-timpang-gender-dan-diskriminatif-terhadap-perempuan-185751
  3. Alderson, Priscilla. ‘Bodily Integrity and Autonomy of the Youngest Children and Consent to Their Healthcare’. Clinical Ethics 19, no. 4 (2024): 291–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509231188006
  4. Amy, Jean-Jacques, and Vrijesh Tripathi. ‘Contraception for Women: An Evidence Based Overview’. BMJ 339 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2895
  5. Ananto, Satrio Bagus Tatag, and Wiwik Afifah. ‘Legality of Contraceptive Use in Children and Adolescents Based on Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024’. Progressive Law Review 6, no. 2 (2024): 139–48. https://doi.org/10.36448/plr.v6i2.224
  6. Ardila, Erlinda Noviantika, and FX. Sri Sadewo. ‘Konstruksi Masyarakat Madura Tentang Pemakaian Alat Kontrasepsi Implan Di’. Paradigma 2, no. 3 (2014): 1–7. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/paradigma/article/view/9080
  7. Aulia, Ajeng Hijriatul, Ibnu Elmi A. S. Pelu, Nyimas Tasya Farhana, and Muhammad Luthfi Setiarno Putera. ‘Controversial Phenomenon of The Freedom to Buy and Sell Contraceptives in Palangka Raya’. Articles. Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL) 7, no. 1 (2025): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.35719/ijlil.v7i1.446
  8. Bağlan, Derya, and Tuğba Yilmaz Esencan. ‘Examining Men’s Attitudes Toward Family Planning in Istanbul, Turkey’. BMC Public Health 25, no. 1 (2025): 1150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22402-2
  9. Barro, Abibata, Noufou Gustave Nana, Dieudonné Soubeiga, et al. ‘Knowledge, Beliefs and Perceptions of Religious Leaders on Modern Contraceptive Use in Burkina Faso: A Qualitative Study’. Pan African Medical Journal 39, no. 1 (2021): 216. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.39.216.27082
  10. Beyene, Sena Adugna, Sileshi Garoma, and Tefera Belachew. ‘Prevalence and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Method Utilization Among Married Couples in the Pastoralist Communities of Fentale District, Eastern Ethiopia’. Scientific Reports 15, no. 1 (2025): 12395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92285-1
  11. Bitzer, Johannes. ‘Male Contraception – Part of Gender Medicine and Reproductive Rights of Men’. Contraception 145 (May 2025): 110734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110734
  12. Blom, Tashina. ‘My Body My Choice: The Hostile Appropriation of Feminist Cultural Memory in American Anti-Vaccine Movements’. Memory Studies 17, no. 5 (2024): 1089–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980241262391
  13. Bongaarts, John, John C. Cleland, John Townsend, Jane T. Bertrand, and Monica Das Gupta. Family Planning Programs for the 21st Century: Rationale and Design. Population Council, 2012. https://doi.org/10.31899/rh11.1016
  14. Bracke, Maud Anne. ‘Women’s Rights, Family Planning, and Population Control: The Emergence of Reproductive Rights in the United Nations (1960s–70s)’. The International History Review 44, no. 4 (2022): 751–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2021.1985585
  15. Burke, Kristen Lagasse, and Laura Duberstein Lindberg. ‘Gender, Power, and Nonpreferred Contraceptive Use in the United States: Results from a National Survey’. Socius 10 (December 2024): 23780231241282641. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241282641
  16. Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. Taylor & Francis, 2014
  17. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Vol. 3. Routledge Press, 1990
  18. Campo-Engelstein, Lisa. ‘Are We Ready for Men to Take the Pill?’ BBC News, 21 October 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-49879667
  19. Chng, Chwee Lye. ‘The Male Role In Contraception: Implications For Health Education’. Journal of School Health 53, no. 3 (1983): 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1983.tb07820.x
  20. Cleland, John, Stan Bernstein, Alex Ezeh, Anibal Faundes, Anna Glasier, and Jolene Innis. ‘Family Planning: The Unfinished Agenda’. The Lancet 368, no. 9549 (2006): 1810–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4
  21. Critchlow, Donald T. ‘Birth Control, Population Control, and Family Planning: An Overview’. Journal of Policy History 7, no. 1 (1995): 1–21. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898030600004127
  22. Davis, Jessica, Joseph Vyankandondera, Stanley Luchters, David Simon, and Wendy Holmes. ‘Male Involvement in Reproductive, Maternal and Child Health: A Qualitative Study of Policymaker and Practitioner Perspectives in the Pacific’. Reproductive Health 13, no. 1 (2016): 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0184-2
  23. Deane, Tameshnie. ‘Gender-Based Violence in International Human Rights Law – The Efficacy of the United Nations Human Rights Legal Framework and CEDAW in Addressing the Issue’. The Age of Human Rights Journal 23 (2024): e8662. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v23.8662
  24. Deese, Jennifer, Subarna Pradhan, Hannah Goetz, and Charles Morrison. ‘Contraceptive Use and the Risk of Sexually Transmitted Infection: Systematic Review and Current Perspectives’. Open Access Journal of Contraception 9 (November 2018): 91–112. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S135439
  25. Derefinko, Karen J., Sydney Ashby, Tristan Hayes, et al. ‘Sexually Transmitted Infections and Contraceptive Use in Adolescents’. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 58, no. 4 (2020): 536–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.012
  26. Elizabeth Wicks. The State and the Body: Legal Regulation of Bodily Autonomy. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016
  27. Faika, Pra Setiawati, Lita Juliana Nur, Siroj Mohamad, Nurhaqi Ari, and Harliyanto Rois. ‘Implementation of Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 on Legal Abortion to Ensure Legal Certainty’. Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) 4, no. 6 (2025): 691–700. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v4i6.14719
  28. Firdaus, Alfian Firdaus, and Imron Mustofa. ‘Kontra-Preventif Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2024 Dalam Menangani Kesehatan Reproduksi Anak Usia Sekolah’. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 4 (2025): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i4.1158
  29. Fisher, Kate. Birth Control, Sex, and Marriage in Britain 1918-1960. OUP Oxford, 2006
  30. Foucault, Michel. ‘Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison’. In Social Theory Re-Wired. Routledge, 2023
  31. Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972 - 1977. Edited by Colin Gordon. Pantheon Books, 1981
  32. Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010
  33. Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. The History of Sexuality, v. 1. Allen Lane, 1979
  34. Gafar, Alfian, Dewi Elizadiani Suza, Ferry Efendi, Eka Mishbahatul Mar’ah Has, Ahmad Putro Pramono, and Ika Adelia Susanti. ‘Determinants of Contraceptive Use Among Married Women in Indonesia’. F1000Research 9 (2020): 193. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22482.1
  35. Genazzani, Andrea R., Tiziana Fidecicchi, Domenico Arduini, et al. ‘Contraception Today and Family Planning: A Comprehensive Review and Position Statement on the Ethical, Medical, and Social Dimensions of Modern Contraception’. Gynecological Endocrinology 41, no. 1 (2025): 2543423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2025.2543423
  36. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). ‘Bodily Autonomy and Reproductive Health’. BMZ, 2023. https://www.bmz.de/en/issues/bodily-autonomy-and-reproductive-health
  37. Gordon, Linda. ‘The Politics of Birth Control, 1920–1940: The Impact of Professionals’. International Journal of Health Services 5, no. 2 (1975): 253–77. https://doi.org/10.2190/BFW2-C705-25TE-F99W
  38. Gustina, Jessi, Riny Apriani, Syahfira Ananda Syahna, and Nurhaida Nurhaida. ‘Influence of Sociocultural Beliefs and Practices on Contraception in Deli Serdang, Indonesia’. Malahayati International Journal of Nursing and Health Science 8, no. 6 (2025): 788–94. https://doi.org/10.33024/minh.v8i6.887
  39. Hartmann, Betsy. ‘Population Control I: Birth of an Ideology’. International Journal of Health Services 27, no. 3 (1997): 523–40. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45130847
  40. Hill, Nicholas J., Mxolisi Siwatu, and Alexander K. Robinson. ‘“My Religion Picked My Birth Control”: The Influence of Religion on Contraceptive Use’. Journal of Religion and Health 53, no. 3 (2014): 825–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9678-1
  41. Idris, Idayu Badilla, Sharifah Saffinas Syed Soffian, Mazni Baharom, Ummi Mirza Baharuddin, Syahirah Hashim, and Azmawati Mohammed Nawi. ‘Influence of Sociocultural Beliefs and Practices on Contraception: A Systematic Review’. Women & Health 62, no. 8 (2022): 688–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2022.2117764
  42. Jain, Rakhi, and Sumathi Muralidhar. ‘Contraceptive Methods: Needs, Options and Utilization’. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 61, no. 6 (2011): 626–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-011-0107-7
  43. James, Nickolas John. ‘Law and Power: Ten Lessons from Foucault’. Bond Law Review 30, no. 1 (2018): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.5658
  44. Johnson, Sarah A., Milly N. Kaggwa, and Eva Lathrop. ‘How It Started, and How It’s Going: Global Family Planning Programs’. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 64, no. 3 (2021): 422–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000625
  45. Kaur, Japneet, Dhananjay Vaidyanathan Rohini, LinChiat Chang, Allie Gugliotti, and Steve Kretschmer. ‘Assessment of Demand for Male Contraceptives: A Multi-Country Study’. Andrology 12, no. 7 (2024): 1512–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13726
  46. Kendall, Megan, and Karina Razli. Indonesia: Sex Work and HIV/AIDS. HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia‐Pacific. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 2010. https://www.aidsdatahub.org/resource/indonesia-sex-work-and-hiv-aids
  47. Kidula, Nancy, Brian T. Nguyen, Ndema Habib, and James Kiarie. ‘The Impact of Male Contraception on Global Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’. Contraception 145 (May 2025): 110811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110811
  48. Kim, Helen H., and Sabrina Holmquist. ‘Contraception’. In Pediatric Endocrinology: A Practical Clinical Guide, edited by Sally Radovick and Madhusmita Misra. Springer International Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73782-9_29
  49. Lam, David. ‘How the World Survived the Population Bomb: Lessons From 50 Years of Extraordinary Demographic History’. Demography 48, no. 4 (2011): 1231–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0070-z
  50. Lee, Joi K., Sarah A. Gutin, Monica Getahun, et al. ‘Condom, Modern Contraceptive, and Dual Method Use Are Associated with HIV Status and Relationship Concurrency in a Context of High Mobility: A Cross-Sectional Study of Women of Reproductive Age in Rural Kenya and Uganda, 2016’. Contraception 117 (January 2023): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.001
  51. Malthus, Thomas Robert. An Essay on the Principle of Population: The 1803 Edition. Yale University Press, 2018
  52. Mbizvo, Michael T., and Sharon J. Phillips. ‘Family Planning: Choices and Challenges for Developing Countries’. Challenges in Fertility Regulation 28, no. 6 (2014): 931–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.014
  53. Natalis, Aga. ‘Breaking the Silence: Gender Power Imbalances, Stealthing, and the Fight for Sexual Autonomy’. Journal of Forensic Medicine Science and Law 33, no. 2 (2024): 68–72. https://doi.org/10.59988/jfmsl.vol.33issue2.12
  54. Natalis, Aga, and Ani Purwanti. Ilmu Hukum Feminis. Rajawali Pers, 2026
  55. Niko, Nikodemus. ‘Indigenous Women in the Food Chain System: The Marginalization and Alienation of Indigenous Knowledge on Environmental Management’. Asian Politics & Policy 17, no. 2 (2025): e70014. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.70014
  56. Niko, Nikodemus, and Jakkrit Sangkhamanee. ‘Beyond Gender Norms: Unveiling Myths and Taboos of Male Rape in Indonesia’. Sexuality, Gender & Policy 8, no. 4 (2025): e70035. https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.70035
  57. Nugroho, Riant. Public Policy 7: Dinamika Kebijakan Publik, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Manajemen Politik Kebijakan Publik, Etika Kebijakan Publik. PT Elex Media Komputindo, 2023
  58. Nurjanah, Siti, Ariyani Lutfitasari, and Novita Nining Anggraeni. ‘Factors Influencing the Selection of Contraceptives: A Literature Review’. Proceedings of the 2nd Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Health Sciences: Midwifery (LSISHS-M 2023), 16 July 2024, 181–88. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-461-7_19
  59. O’Connor, Aoife M., Maximillian Seunik, Blas Radi, et al. ‘Transcending the Gender Binary Under International Law: Advancing Health-Related Human Rights for Trans* Populations’. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50, no. 3 (2022): 409–24. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2022.84
  60. Palmer, Zachary D., and Elle Rochford. ‘Bodily Autonomy and the Limits of Gender-Based Activism in Organizing Beyond the Binary’. In Handbook of Gender and Activism. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803929583.00014
  61. Potts, Malcolm, and Martha Campbell. ‘History of Contraception’. The Global Library of Women’s Medicine, ahead of print, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3843/GLOWM.10376
  62. Putri, Carolina Retmawati, Suryani Suryani, and Zulfa Safitri Kusumaningrum. ‘Negotiating the Body: Reproductive Autonomy and Gendered Power in Family Planning Program’. Jurnal Hawa: Studi Pengarus Utamaan Gender Dan Anak 7, no. 1 (2025): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.29300/hawapsga.v7i1.8736
  63. Raebig, Abigail. Birth Control and First Wave Feminism. Texas Woman’s University, 2020. https://twu.edu/media/documents/history-government/Birth-Control-and-First-Wave-Feminism.pdf
  64. Ramazanoglu, Caroline, and Janet Holland. ‘Women’s Sexuality and Men’s Appropriation of Desire’. In Up Against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions between Foucault and Feminism, edited by Caroline Ramazanoglu. Routledge, 1993. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203408681-16
  65. Roseman, Mindy Jane, and Laura Reichenbach. ‘International Conference on Population and Development at 15 Years: Achieving Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights for All?’ American Journal of Public Health 100, no. 3 (2010): 403–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.177873
  66. Ross, John, and Karen Hardee. ‘Use of Male Methods of Contraception Worldwide’. Journal of Biosocial Science 49, no. 5 (2017): 648–63. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000560
  67. Saluk, Seda. ‘“My Body, My Decision!”: Abortion, Bodily Autonomy, and Reproductive Rights Activism in Turkey’. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 19, no. 3 (2023): 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-10815525
  68. Scheffer, David J., and Mark S. Ellis. ‘Protect Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’. In The UN Charter: Five Pillars for Humankind, edited by David J. Scheffer and Mark S. Ellis. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94866-4_2
  69. Scott, Alison, and Anna Glasier. ‘Evidence Based Contraceptive Choices’. Towards Evidence-Based Gynaecology 20, no. 5 (2006): 665–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.03.002
  70. Sitruk-Ware, Regine, Anita Nath, and Daniel R. Mishell. ‘Contraception Technology: Past, Present and Future’. Contraception 87, no. 3 (2013): 319–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.002
  71. Spratt, Kai, Izhar Fihir, and Claudia Surjadjaja. Implementing 100% Condom Use Policies in Indonesia: A Case Study of Two Districts in Jakarta. USAID Health Policy Initiative, 2007. http://www.healthpolicyplus.com/archive/ns/pubs/hpi/Documents/398_1_Indonesia_Cup_Case_Study_FINAL_2_28_08.pdf
  72. Srikanthan, Amirrtha, and Robert L. Reid. ‘Religious and Cultural Influences on Contraception’. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 30, no. 2 (2008): 129–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32736-0
  73. Starrs, Ann M., Alex C. Ezeh, Gary Barker, et al. ‘Accelerate Progress—Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights for All: Report of the Guttmacher–Lancet Commission’. The Lancet 391, no. 10140 (2018): 2642–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9
  74. Sternberg, Peter, Alan White, and John H. Hubley. ‘Damned If They Do, Damned If They Don’t: Tensions in Nicaraguan Masculinities as Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Health Promotion’. Men and Masculinities 10, no. 5 (2008): 538–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06291920
  75. Stevenson, Robin. My Body, My Choice: The Fight for Abortion Rights. Vol. 2. Orca Book Publishers, 2019
  76. Tavory, Iddo, and Ann Swidler. ‘Condom Semiotics: Meaning and Condom Use in Rural Malawi’. American Sociological Review 74, no. 2 (2009): 171–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400201
  77. Teal, Stephanie, and Alison Edelman. ‘Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review’. JAMA 326, no. 24 (2021): 2507–18. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.21392
  78. Tempo.co. ‘Dedi Mulyadi Klarifikasi Soal Vasektomi Jadi Syarat Penerima Bansos’. Tempo.Co, 8 May 2025. https://www.tempo.co/politik/dedi-mulyadi-klarifikasi-soal-vasektomi-jadi-syarat-penerima-bansos-1374571
  79. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. ‘Condom Availability in Schools: A Practical Approach to the Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infection/HIV and Unintended Pregnancy’. Journal of Adolescent Health 60, no. 6 (2017): 754–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.03.019
  80. Trauner, Miri. ‘My Body, Whose Choice? A Case for a Fundamental Right to Bodily Autonomy’. Brooklyn Law Review 89, no. 2 (2024): 643–79. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol89/iss2/6/
  81. UNFPA Executive Director. Human Rights Require Bodily Autonomy for All – at All Times. 9 December 2023. https://www.unfpa.org/press/human-rights-require-bodily-autonomy-all-%E2%80%93-all-times
  82. Wolf, Katharina, and Petra Theunissen. ‘“My Body, My Choice”: Discursive Brandjacking and the Strategic Reframing of Protest Language’. Public Relations Review 52, no. 1 (2026): 102652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102652
  83. World Health Organization. Family Planning/Contraception. World Health Organization, 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception
  84. Wulandari, Dwi, and Ella Nurlaella Hadi. ‘Asosiasi Budaya Patriarki Terhadap Penggunaan Kontrasepsi’. Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung 16, no. 2 (2024): 354–64. https://doi.org/10.34011/juriskesbdg.v16i2.2549

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-03 15:55:50

No citation recorded.