DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.14.2.299-328

BEYOND HEALTH INFORMATION TRANSPARENCY: REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE, BIOPOWER, AND WOMEN’S AUTONOMY IN INDONESIA

*Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Salwa Putri Hardiyan  -  LLM Environmental, Social, and Governance Law and Policy, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
Henny Juliani  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

In Indonesia, transparency in reproductive health information has increasingly been promoted as a legal and policy strategy to address reproductive injustice and strengthen women’s rights. Through instruments such as the Public Information Disclosure Act and Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, the state formally recognises women’s access to information regarding contraception, pregnancy, reproductive services, and health rights. However, this study critically examines whether transparency genuinely expands women’s reproductive autonomy or instead reproduces subtle forms of governance over women’s reproductive bodies. Employing a socio-legal approach, this study combines normative analysis of legal frameworks with critical discourse analysis to examine how women are constructed as legal subjects within Indonesia’s reproductive health regime. The analysis is guided by feminist legal theory, Foucauldian biopolitics, and epistemic justice to explore the relationship between information, power, and reproductive decision-making. The findings reveal that legal recognition of reproductive health information does not automatically generate substantive autonomy. Although women may formally obtain reproductive knowledge, their ability to exercise meaningful choices remains constrained by patriarchal decision-making structures, unequal access to healthcare services, bureaucratic barriers, and the dominance of medical expertise. Transparency may therefore create an appearance of empowerment while simultaneously reinforcing institutional authority exercised by the state and healthcare systems. This study argues that reproductive justice requires more than expanding access to information; it requires transforming the power relations that determine who can access, interpret, and utilise reproductive knowledge. As an alternative framework, this study proposes epistemic sovereignty, understood as women’s right to define, manage, and control reproductive knowledge according to their own circumstances. Genuine reproductive autonomy can only emerge when women are recognised not as passive recipients of information but as authoritative subjects within a rights-based and accountable reproductive health governance system.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Transparency; Reproductive Health; Epistemic Sovereignty; Biopower; Feminist Legal Theory

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Arsenal Hukum Progresif Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan Pembangunan Hukum Negara dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Perspektif Hukum Progresif More cited articles
  1. Afad, Mochammad Najmul, Agus Indiyanto, Maghfur Ahmad, Nur Fajariyah, and Mukh Imron Ali Mahmudi. ‘Traditional Birth Attendants as Guardians of Tradition amidst Modernization in Javanese Culture’. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 16, no. 1 (2024): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v16.i1.8761
  2. Amigot, Patricia, and Margot Pujal. ‘On Power, Freedom, and Gender: A Fruitful Tension between Foucault and Feminism’. Theory & Psychology 19, no. 5 (2009): 646–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309341925
  3. Arukwe, Nnanna Onuoha, Chukwudi Samuel Chime, and Francis Okoronkwo Okwara. ‘A Postcolonial Feminist Perspective on Traditional Birth Attendants and Management of Pregnancy Complications Among Indigenous Women in Rural Nigeria’. Affilia 40, no. 1 (2025): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099241256918
  4. Azis, Imron Rizki, Aidir Amin Daud, Ahmad Muhtaram, and Pipit Somefotorono Majid. ‘The Instruments of Information Dispute Resolution in Indonesia’. Jurnal Al-Dustur 9, no. 1 (2026): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30863/aldustur.v9i1.10449
  5. Barroso, Carmen. ‘Beyond Cairo: Sexual and Reproductive Rights of Young People in the New Development Agenda’. Global Public Health 9, no. 6 (2014): 639–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.917198
  6. Bartlett, Katharine T. ‘Gender Law’. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy 1, no. 1 (1994): 1–20. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djglp/vol1/iss1/1/
  7. Beime, Kristina, and Simon Lundh. ‘The Exclusion of Deviant Employees: A Foucauldian Analysis of Disciplinary Power in Organizations’. Organization, 29 April 2025, 13505084251325295. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084251325295
  8. BKKBN. Indonesian Population Report Tahun 2023. 1st edn. BKKBN, 2023
  9. Buskens, Ineke, and Mirjam van Reisen. ‘Theorising Agency in ICT4D: Epistemic Sovereignty and Transformation-in-Connection’. In Underdevelopment, Development and the Future of Africa. Langaa RPCIG, 2017
  10. Butt, Simon. ‘Freedom of Information Law and Its Application in Indonesia: A Preliminary Assessment’. Asian Journal of Comparative Law 8 (2013): 1–42. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000879
  11. Carroll, Allison, and Anuj Kapilashrami. ‘Barriers to Uptake of Reproductive Information and Contraceptives in Rural Tanzania: An Intersectionality Informed Qualitative Enquiry’. BMJ Open 10, no. 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036600
  12. Chamallas, Martha. Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory. Introduction to Law Series. Aspen Publishers, 2003
  13. Choguya, Naume Zorodzai. ‘Traditional Birth Attendants and Policy Ambivalence in Zimbabwe’. Journal of Anthropology 2014, no. 1 (2014): 750240. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/750240
  14. Cormacain, Ronan. ‘Legislation, Legislative Drafting and the Rule of Law’. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 5, no. 2 (2017): 115–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2017.1394045
  15. Curtin, Deirdre, and Albert Jacob Meijer. ‘Does Transparency Strengthen Legitimacy?’ Information Polity 11, no. 2 (2006): 109–22. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2006-0091
  16. Daviss, Betty-Anne, and Robbie Davis-Floyd. Birthing Models on the Human Rights Frontier: Speaking Truth to Power. Routledge, 2020
  17. Dewi, Kurniawati Hastuti. ‘The City, PKK Leaders, and Women’s Empowerment’. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies 29, no. 1 (2023): 121–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2023.2170047
  18. Dwyer, Leslie K. ‘Spectacular Sexuality: Nationalism, Development and the Politics of Family Planning in Indonesia’. In Gender Ironies of Nationalism. Routledge, 2012
  19. Effoduh, Jake Okechukwu. ‘Decolonizing the Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Africa: From Normative Mimicry to Epistemic Sovereignty’. Science and Public Policy 53, no. 2 (2026): 245–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag005
  20. Ells, Carolyn. ‘Foucault, Feminism, and Informed Choice’. Journal of Medical Humanities 24, no. 3 (2003): 213–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026006403305
  21. Esposito, Roberto. Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press, 2008
  22. Fathalla, Mahmoud F., Steven W. Sinding, Allan Rosenfield, and Mohammed MF Fathalla. ‘Sexual and Reproductive Health for All: A Call for Action’. The Lancet 368, no. 9552 (2006): 2095–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69483-X
  23. Faulks, Fiona, Touran Shafiei, Ingrid Mogren, and Kristina Edvardsson. ‘“It’s Just Too Far…”: A Qualitative Exploration of the Barriers and Enablers to Accessing Perinatal Care for Rural Australian Women.’ Women and Birth 37, no. 6 (2024): 101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101809
  24. Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. Viking, 1977
  25. Foucault, Michel. La Volonté De Savoir. Bibliothèque Des Histoires. Gallimard, 1976
  26. Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010
  27. Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
  28. Glissant, Edouard. Poétique De La Relation. Gallimard, 1990
  29. Greenberg, Daniel. ‘The Nature of Legislative Intention and Its Implications for Legislative Drafting †’. Statute Law Review 27, no. 1 (2006): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmi022
  30. Hale, Thomas N. ‘Transparency, Accountability, and Global Governance’. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (Leiden, The Netherlands) 14, no. 1 (2008): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01401006
  31. Healy, S. ‘Epistemological Pluralism and the “Politics of Choice”’. Futures 35, no. 7 (2003): 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00022-3
  32. Hoyt, Jenna, Jessie K. Hamon, Shari Krishnaratne, et al. ‘“It Was My Own Decision”: The Transformational Shift That Influences a Woman’s Decision to Use Contraceptives Covertly’. BMC Women’s Health 22, no. 1 (2022): 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01731-z
  33. Hull, Terence H. ‘The Political Framework for Family Planning in Indonesia Three Decades of Development’. In Two Is Enough: Family Planning in Indonesia under the New Order (1968-1998). Brill, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454576_006
  34. Jayadi, Anbar. ‘What Constitutes as Limitation of (Human) Rights in Indonesian Legal Context?’ Hasanuddin Law Review 3, no. 3 (2017): 290–306. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i3.1203
  35. Kassie, Aychew, Alemnew Wale, Desalegn Girma, Hailemariam Amsalu, and Mastewal yechale. ‘The Role of Traditional Birth Attendants and Problem of Integration with Health Facilities in Remote Rural Community of West Omo Zone 2021: Exploratory Qualitative Study’. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 22, no. 1 (2022): 425. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04753-5
  36. Kotni, Mounia El. ‘Midwifery in Cross-Cultural Perspectives’. In The Routledge Handbook of Anthropology and Reproduction. Routledge, 2021
  37. Kramarae, Cheris. Women and Men Speaking: Frameworks for Analysis. Newbury House Publishers, 1981
  38. Lawlor, Leonard, and John Nale, eds. ‘Normalization’. In The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, 2014. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022309.056
  39. Lubis, Firman. ‘History and Structure of the National Family Planning Program’. In Two Is Enough: Family Planning in Indonesia under the New Order (1968-1998). Brill, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454576_005
  40. Luffy, Samantha M., Dabney P. Evans, and Roger W. Rochat. ‘“Regardless, You Are Not the First Woman”: An Illustrative Case Study of Contextual Risk Factors Impacting Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Nicaragua’. BMC Women’s Health 19, no. 1 (2019): 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0771-9
  41. Lugones, Marìa. ‘Toward a Decolonial Feminism’. Hypatia 25, no. 4 (2010): 742–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x
  42. MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press, 1989
  43. Mahiti, Gladys R., Angwara D. Kiwara, Columba K. Mbekenga, Anna-Karin Hurtig, and Isabel Goicolea. ‘“We Have Been Working Overnight Without Sleeping”: Traditional Birth Attendants’ Practices and Perceptions of Post-Partum Care Services in Rural Tanzania’. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 15, no. 1 (2015): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0445-z
  44. Mamun, Md Abdullah Al, Atika Rahman Chowdhury, Md Nuruzzaman Khan, et al. ‘Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Traditional Birth Attendants in Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study on Maternal and Newborn Healthcare in Local Community’. Health Science Reports 8, no. 12 (2025): e71618. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71618
  45. Man, Hongjie. ‘Informed Consent and Medical Law’. In Legal and Forensic Medicine, edited by Roy G. Beran. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_90
  46. Nair, Sumati, Sarah Sexton, and Preeti Kirbat. ‘A Decade after Cairo: Women’s Health in a Free Market Economy’. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 13, no. 2 (2006): 171–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150601300203
  47. Natalis, Aga. ‘Capitalism, Beauty Standards, and the Law: A Feminist-Foucauldian Critique of Body Regulation’. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 2025. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2025.69150.4193
  48. Natalis, Aga. ‘Power, Law, and the Semiotics of Marginalisation: Rethinking Prostitution, Health Risk, and Legal Discourse in Indonesia’. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, ahead of print, 2 July 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10310-y
  49. Natalis, Aga, Marzellina Hardiyanti, and Adventi Ferawati Sembiring. ‘Sexuality, Privacy, and Human Rights: Rethinking the Criminalisation of Consensual Relationships in Indonesia’. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 18, no. 1 (2026): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v18.i1.10154
  50. Natalis, Aga, and Ani Purwanti. Ilmu Hukum Feminis. Rajawali Pers, 2026
  51. Natalis, Aga, Adventi Ferawati Sembiring, and Emy Handayani. ‘From Rejection to Recognition: Human Rights, Morality, and the Future of Marijuana Policy in Indonesia’. International Journal of Drug Policy 140 (June 2025): 104817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104817
  52. National Population and Family Planning Board, Statistical Indonesia, Ministry of Health - Kemenkes, and ICF. Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2017. BKKBN, BPS, Kemenkes, and ICF, 2018. http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR342/FR342.pdf
  53. Newland, Lynda. ‘The Deployment of the Prosperous Family: Family Planning in West Java’. NWSA Journal 13, no. 3 (2001): 22–48. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/25318
  54. Oksala, Johanna. ‘From Biopower to Governmentality’. In A Companion to Foucault. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118324905.ch15
  55. Opara, Uchechi Clara, and Pammla Petrucka. ‘Cultural Beliefs and Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa Influencing Use of Maternal Health Services: A Systematic Integrative Review of Qualitative Research’. Nursing Forum 2025, no. 1 (2025): 6416345. https://doi.org/10.1155/nuf/6416345
  56. Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. ‘Medicine, Governmentality and Biopower in Cosmetic Surgery’. In The Legal, Medical and Cultural Regulation of the Body. Routledge, 2016
  57. Privacy International. ‘Country Case-Study: Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Indonesia’. 2 June 2020. https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/3853/country-case-study-sexual-and-reproductive-rights-indonesia
  58. Rasidjan, Maryani Palupy. ‘“Kita Habis…we Will Be Gone”: The Politics of Population, Family Planning and Racialization in West Papua’. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 38, no. 4 (2024): 407–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12817
  59. Rianarizkiwati, N., and J. Asshiddiqie. ‘Protection of Personal Information: The State’s Obligation to Guarantee the Right to Privacy in Indonesia’. In Law and Justice in a Globalized World. Routledge, 2017
  60. Ross, Loretta, and Rickie Solinger. Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. University of California Press, 2017
  61. Rudrum, Sarah. ‘Traditional Birth Attendants in Rural Northern Uganda: Policy, Practice, and Ethics’. Health Care for Women International 37, no. 2 (2016): 250–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2015.1020539
  62. Ruud, Millard H. ‘No Law Shall Embrace More Than One Subject’. Minnesota Law Review 42 (1958): 389–458. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1976/
  63. Sankar V, Asha, and Moly Kuruvilla. ‘Myths and Misconceptions About Sexual and Reproductive Health Among Indigenous Women—An Intergenerational Study Using Dyadic Interviews’. Asian Women 39, no. 3 (2023): 69–89. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2023.9.39.3.69
  64. Savitri, Niken, and Aep Gunarsa. HAM Perempuan: Kritik Teori Hukum Feminis Terhadap KUHP. Refika Aditama, 2008
  65. Shiffman, Jeremy. ‘Political Management in the Indonesian Family Planning Program’. International Family Planning Perspectives 30, no. 1 (2004): 27–33. https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/ipsrh/2004/03/political-management-indonesian-family-planning-program
  66. Simonds, Vanessa Watts, Eva Marie Garroutte, and Dedra Buchwald. ‘Health Literacy and Informed Consent Materials: Designed for Documentation, Not Comprehension of Health Research’. Journal of Health Communication 22, no. 8 (2017): 682–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1341565
  67. Smart, Carol. Feminism and the Power of Law. Sociology of Law and Crime. Routledge, 1989
  68. Surtimanah, Tuti, and Yanti Herawati. ‘Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) Positioning on Strengthening Partnership with Midwives’. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat 13, no. 1 (2017): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v13i1.7452
  69. Suryahadi, Asep, Athia Yumna, Umbu Reku Raya, and Deswanto Marbun. ‘Poverty Reduction: The Track Record and Way Forward’. In Diagnosing the Indonesian Economy: Toward Inclusive and Green Growth, edited by Hal Hill, Muhammad Ehsan Khan, and Juzhong Zhuang. Anthem Press, 2012. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843313786.012
  70. Syairaji, M., Detty Siti Nurdiati, Bayu Satria Wiratama, Zita D. Prüst, Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp, and Kim J. C. Verschueren. ‘Trends and Causes of Maternal Mortality in Indonesia: A Systematic Review’. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 24, no. 1 (2024): 515. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06687-6
  71. Taylor, Chloë. ‘Biopower’. In Michel Foucault: Key Concepts, edited by Dianna Taylor. Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing, 2010. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654734.004
  72. Tchoukou, Julie Ada. ‘From Beijing to Addis Ababa: Africa’s Epistemic Sovereignty and the Convention on Ending Violence against Women and Girls’. Human Rights Review 26, no. 4 (2025): 337–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-026-00757-2
  73. Thongmixay, Souksamone, Dirk Rombout Essink, Tim de Greeuw, Viengnakhone Vongxay, Vanphanom Sychareun, and Jacqueline E. W. Broerse. ‘Perceived Barriers in Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Youth in Lao People’s Democratic Republic’. Plos One 14, no. 10 (2019): e0218296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218296
  74. Wahyuningsih, Sri, Sri Widati, Sarva Mangala Praveena, and Mohammad Wavy Azkiya. ‘Unveiling Barriers to Reproductive Health Awareness Among Rural Adolescents: A Systematic Review’. Frontiers in Reproductive Health 6 (2024): 1444111. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2024.1444111
  75. Wyatt, Kirk D., Ryan T. Anderson, Douglas Creedon, et al. ‘Women’s Values in Contraceptive Choice: A Systematic Review of Relevant Attributes Included in Decision Aids’. BMC Women’s Health 14, no. 1 (2014): 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-28
  76. Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press, 1990
  77. Zaluchu, Sonny, and Fotarisman Zaluchu. ‘“God Has Commanded Me”: A Spiritual Code of a Traditional Birth Attendance (TBA)’. International Journal of Practical Theology 27, no. 2 (2023): 285–99. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1515/ijpt-2022-0011
  78. Zimmerman, Margaret S. ‘Information Poverty and Reproductive Healthcare: Assessing the Reasons for Inequity Between Income Groups’. Social Work in Public Health 32, no. 3 (2017): 210–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2016.1268990

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-03 15:56:31

No citation recorded.