Keanekaragaman Hayati di Lahan Rehabilitasi Taman Nasional Meru Betiri dan Implikasi Kebijakannya: Kasus Desa Wonosari

Alvian Febry Anggana  -  Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pengelolaan daerah Aliran Sungai, Indonesia
*Sigit Andy Cahyono  -  Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pengelolaan daerah Aliran Sungai, Indonesia
Casimerus Yudi Lastiantoro  -  Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pengelolaan daerah Aliran Sungai, Indonesia
Received: 21 Mar 2019; Published: 9 Sep 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Abstract

After the looting and destruction of forest land in the Merubetiri National Park area were effortS to restore the area to its original condition. Various efforts were made involving the community in the rehabilitation of Meru Betiri National Park land. One indicator of the success of land rehabilitation is increasing biodiversity. The purpose of this study was to determine biodiversity in the rehabilitation area of Meru Betiri National Park. The method used uses a 100-200 m striped line combination at each location for vegetation data collection. Vegetation analysis by calculating type frequency, species density, species dominance, important value index, species diversity index, species richness index and distribution pattern. The results showed that there were 14 types of vegetation in 11 families in 4 common observation plots and jackfruit plants (Artocarpus heterophyllus) and showed adaptability and these plants were needed by the community. Based on the results of the study, the INP value of the Wonoasri plot was 103.27% Pete (Parkia speciosa), Bonangan plot was Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) of 154.18%, Donglo plot of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) was 133.22%, and Jackfruit Pletes (Artocarpus heterophyllus) of 262.41%. For this reason, it is necessary to do new types of enhancements and compaction of spacing on each rehabilitation plot so that the value of diversity and species richness can increase, so that the success of rehabilitation can be seen.

Keywords: Biodiversity, National park, Conservation
Funding: BPPTPDAS, Taman Nasional Meru Betiri, ketua kelompok tani dan petani lahan rehabilitasi.

Article Metrics:

  1. Aliadi, A. 2010. Developing partnership for conservation at Meru Betiri National park. Technical Report no 6. ITTO, Cifor, Latin, dan Taman Nasional Meru Betiri. Jember
  2. Amin, M., I. Rachman dan S. Ramlah. 2016. Jenis agroforestri dan orientasi pemanfaatan lahan di Desa Simora Kecamatan Gumbasa Kabupaten Sigi. Warta Rimba, 4(2): 97—104
  3. Atangana A, Khasa D, Chang S, Degrande A. 2014. Tropical Agroforestri. Springer. 380 pages
  4. Balakrishnan, M., R. Borgstrom and S.W.Bie. 1994. Tropical Ecosystem, a synthesis of tropical Ecology and Conservation. International Science Publisher. New York
  5. Bernhardt, E. S., Sudduth, E. B., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., …., dan Lave, R. (2007). Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of US river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology, 15(3): 482-493
  6. BPPTPDAS. 2016. Resolusi konflik tenurial di Taman Nasional Meru Betiri Jember. Laporan hasil penelitian. Badan Penelitian Pengembangan dan Inovasi, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. Solo. Tidak dipublikasikan
  7. BPPTPDAS. 2017. Resolusi konflik tenurial di Taman Nasional Meru Betiri Jember. Laporan hasil penelitian. Badan Penelitian Pengembangan dan Inovasi, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. Solo. Tidak dipublikasikan
  8. Hakim, L., I. Aldianoveri., I.K. Bangsa dan D.A. Guntoro. 2018. Peran dan dampak konflik tenurial kehutanan bagi pengelolaan keanekaragaman hayati di kawasan cagar biosfer di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Hutan Tropis, 6 (1): 43—51
  9. Hasibuan, S.H., A. Sunkar dan Y. Santosa. 2017. Identifikasi peubah social ekonomi penentu keberhasilan konservasi keanekaragaman hayati. Media Konservasi, 22 (2): 156—163
  10. Heru. 2016. Rekayasa Vegetatif Untuk Mengurangi Resiko Longsor. Surakarta: Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai
  11. Jordan, N. R., Larson, D. L., dan Huerd, S. C. 2008. Soil modification by invasive plants: Effects on native and invasive species of mixed-grass prairies. Biological Invasions, 10(2): 177-190
  12. Kondolf, G. M., Anderson, S., Lave, R., Pagano, L., Merenlender, A., dan Bernhardt, E. 2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology, 15(3): 516-523
  13. Kusmana, C dan A.R. Melyanti. 2017. Keragaman komposisi jenis dan struktur vegetasi pada kawasan hutan lindung dengan pola PHBM di BKPH Tampomas, KPH Sumedang, Perum Perhutani divisi regional Jawa Barat dan Banten. Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika, 8 (2) Agustus 2017: 123—129
  14. Kusmana. (1997). Metode Survey Vegetasi. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
  15. Lovett, G. M., Burns, D. A., Driscoll, C. T., ......., dan Haeuber, R. 2007. Who needs environmental monitoring? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(5): 253-260
  16. Ludwig, J., & Reynold, J. (1988). Statistical Ecology. New York: Jhon Wiley and Sons
  17. Magurran, A. (1988). Statistical Ecology. New York: Jhon Wiley and Sons
  18. McDonald, T., Gann, G., Jonson, J., dan Dixon, K. 2016. International standards for the practice of ecological restoration – Including principles and key concepts. (First Edition). Washington, DC: Society for Ecological Restoration
  19. Morandi, B., Piégay, H., Lamouroux, N., dan Vaudor, L. 2014. How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 137: 178-188
  20. Norton, D. A. 2009. Species invasions and the limits to restoration: Learning from the New Zealand experience. Science, 325(5940): 569-571
  21. Nugroho, A.W. dan I. Yassir. 2017. Kebijakan penilaian keberhasilan reklamasi lahan pasca tambang batubara di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 14 (2): 121-136
  22. Nuridal, N.L., A. Mulyani, F. Widiastuti dan F. Agus. 2018. Potensi dan model agroforestri untuk rehabilitasi lahan terdegradasi di Kabupaten Berau, Paser dan Kutai Timur, Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim, 42 (1): 13—26.
  23. Nurrochmat, D.R., I.A. Nugroho, Hardjanto, A. Purwadianto, A. Maryusi dan J.T. Erbaugh. 2017. Shifting contestation into cooperation: strategy to incorporate different interest of actors in medicinal plants in Meru Betiri National park, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 83 (2017): 162-168
  24. Puspaningrum, D dan T. Agustina. 2014. Model pembangunan alternative berbasis masyarakat pada Taman Nasional Meru Betiri. Agritop Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 12 (2): 188—199
  25. http://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/AGRITROP/article/view/723/591
  26. Soerianegara, I., & Indrawan, A. (1998). Ekologi Hutan Indonesia. Jurusan Manajemen Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor
  27. Suding, K. N. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: Successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 42(1): 465
  28. Sugiyono. 2013. Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabet. Bandung
  29. Sundarapandian, S.M. and P.S. Swamy. 2000. Forest ecosystem structure and composition along an altitudinal gradient in the Western Ghats, South India. Journal Of Tropical Forest Science 12(1): 104-123
  30. Vilà, M., Espinar, J L., Hejda, M., ….., dan Pyšek, P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: A meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology letters, 14(7): 702-708
  31. Yassir, I dan R. M. Omon. 2009. Pemilihan jenis jenis pohon potensial untuk mendukung kegiatan restorasi lahan tambang melalui pendekatan ekologis. Prosiding Workshop IPTEK Penyelamatan Hutan Melalui Rehabilitasi Lahan Pasca tambang Batubara pp: 64-76. Samarinda: Balai Besar Penelitian Dipterokarpa

Last update: 2021-03-06 02:27:58

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-03-06 02:27:58

No citation recorded.