skip to main content

Effect of NaOH on biogas production under SSAD conditions along with kinetics studies

1Environmental Science, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

2Diponegoro University

Received: 8 Jan 2020; Published: 31 Aug 2020.
Editor(s): Sudarno Utomo

Citation Format:
Abstract
Indonesia is a large rice producing country where from these activities it produces waste in the form of rice husk. Rice husk cannot be degraded by itself due to the lignin content contained in the rice husk. Therefore, treatment is carried out to destroy the lignin content and use it as alternative energy in the form of biogas. The study was conducted at a laboratory scale at room temperature, preliminary treatment using 3% NaOH under the SSAD conditions of 27.5% TS and then biogas production was measured once every two days for 90 days. Furthermore, the results of biogas production were observed between biogas with NaOH and without NaOH and carried out a study of the kinetics. The result is that biogas production with NaOH is higher, reaching 59.2 mL/grTS whereas without NaOH at 14.7 mL/grTS. The results of kinetic studies using mathematical modeling through the Gompertz equation, the variable with NaOH is known to have a maximum biogas production of 63.9 mL/grTS, a daily biogas production rate of 0.97 mL/grTS.day and the initial formation of biogas significantly on the 8th day.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Biogas; Rice husk; NaOH; SSAD; Kinetics

Article Metrics:

  1. Chandra, R., Takeuchi, H., & Hasegawa, T. (2012). Hydrothermal pretreatment of rice straw biomass: A potential and promising method for enhanced methane production. Applied Energy, 94(January), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.027
  2. Chandra, R., Takeuchi, H., Hasegawa, T., & Kumar, R. (2012). Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments. Energy, 43(1), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.029
  3. F. Carrillo, M. J. Lis, X. Colom, M. López-Mesas, J. V. (2005). Effect of alkali pretreatment on cellulase hydrolysis of wheat straw: Kinetic study. Process Biochemistry, 40(10), 3360–3364. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.003
  4. Hawali Abdul Matin, H., & Hadiyanto. (2018). Biogas Production from Rice Husk Waste by using Solid State Anaerobic Digestion (SSAD) Method. E3S Web of Conferences, 31, 02007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183102007
  5. Matin, H. H. A., & Hadiyanto, H. (2018). Optimization of biogas production from rice husk waste by solid state anaerobic digestion (SSAD) using response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2018.147.156
  6. Nugraha, W. D., Syafrudin, Senduk, A. T., Matin, H. H. A., & Budiyono. (2018). Optimization of Biogas Production by Solid State Anaerobic Digestion (SS-AD) Method from Water Hyacinth with Response Surface Methodology (RSM). E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 01016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187301016
  7. Putri, D. A., Saputro, R. R., & Budiyono, B. (2019). Biogas Production from Cow Manure. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 1(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.1.2.61-64
  8. Syafrudin, Dwi Nugraha, W., Hawali Abdul Matin, H., & Budiyono. (2017). The effect of enzymatic pretreatment and c/n ratio to biogas production from rice husk waste during solid state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD). MATEC Web of Conferences, 101, 02016. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710102016
  9. Taherdanak, M., & Zilouei, H. (2014). Improving biogas production from wheat plant using alkaline pretreatment. Fuel, 115, 714–719. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.094

Last update:

  1. Effect of thermal and NaOH pretreatment on water hyacinth to enhance the biogas production

    Binoy Kumar Show, Gaayathri Shivakumaran, Apurba Koley, Anudeb Ghosh, Shibani Chaudhury, Amit Kumar Hazra, S. Balachandran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (57), 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30810-3

Last update: 2024-12-25 19:16:51

No citation recorded.