DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.4.836-844

Analysis the Effect of Flux and Water Characteristics on Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane Performance as Pre-Treatment of SWRO

Environmental Engineering Study Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 9 Oct 2023; Revised: 10 Jan 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2024; Available online: 28 May 2024; Published: 7 Jun 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Increasing human population resulted in higher demand for potable freshwater, while freshwater sources were limited. As an alternative solution, seawater was necessarily to be employed as a main source of water supply and necessarily treated with Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO). However, membrane fouling of SWRO was occurred. Therefore, implementation of ultrafiltration membranes as pre-treatment were necessary. In this study, identification of removal efficiency seawater characteristics of TDS, COD, conductivity, and UV-Vis parameters at different flux and investigation of the fouling rate at variations filtration performance of the 50 kDa MWCO pore size PES ultrafiltration membrane was performed. Filtration of laboratory scale experiment with constant flux of 120 L/m²⋅h and 180 L/m²⋅h at dead-end operation was performed. Filtration of 50 kDa PES ultrafiltration membrane was able to remove effectively turbidity, TDS, UV-Vis, conductivity, and COD with 63±6%; 37±19%; 7±4%; 33±33%; dan 97.86%, respectively. Furthermore, related to membrane performance, filtration at 120 L/m²·h flux operation was found as the common fouling mechanisms, while flux operation at 180 L/m²·h resulted different behavior resulted for severe membrane performance.  The suitable operation of fluxes 120 L/m²·h was recommended to increase the performance and membrane lifespan as well as to decrease the load of SWRO unit.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Ultrafiltration membrane; Constant flux; Fouling; Organic matter; SWRO Pre-treatment

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Flood Risk Analysis in Gajah Wong River, Yogyakarta City Perhitungan Potensi Beban Pencemaran Air di DAS Way Sekampung Kabupaten Pringsewu Analisis Kualitas Pantai Berdasarkan Keberadaan Sampah di Pantai Wisata Bahak, Probolinggo More recent articles
Most cited articles
Uji Toksisitas Akut Dalam Penentuan LC50-96H Insektisida Klorpirifos Terhadap Dua Jenis Ikan Budidaya Danau Kembar, Sumatera Barat IDENTIFIKASI DAN UJI POTENSI BAKTERI LIPOLITIK DARI LIMBAH SBE (SPENT BLEACHING EARTH) SEBAGAI AGEN BIOREMEDIASI ANALISIS PEMANFAATAN RUANG YANG BERWAWASAN LINGKUNGAN DI KAWASAN PESISIR KOTA TEGAL Analisis Penyebab Masyarakat Tetap Tinggal di Kawasan Rawan Bencana Gunung Merapi (Studi di Lereng Gunung Merapi Kecamatan Cangkringan, Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta) KAJIAN KERENTANAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PERUBAHAN IKLIM BERBASIS DAERAH ALIRAN SUNGAI (STUDI KASUS SUB DAS GARANG HULU) More cited articles
  1. Alsawaftah, N., Abuwatfa, W., Darwish, N., & Husseini, G. (2021). A comprehensive review on membrane fouling: Mathematical modelling, prediction, diagnosis, and mitigation. In Water (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 9). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091327
  2. Bera, S., Godhaniya, M., & Kothari, C. (2021). Emerging and advanced membrane technology for wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202100259
  3. BPS DKI Jakarta. (2022). PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA DALAM ANGKA DKI JAKARTA 2022
  4. Brover, S., Lester, Y., Brenner, A., & Sahar-Hadar, E. (2022). Optimization of ultrafiltration as pre-treatment for seawater RO desalination. Desalination, 524, 115478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115478
  5. Darwish, M., Abdulrahim, H., Hassan, A., & Sharif, A. (2014). Needed seawater reverse osmosis pilot plant in Qatar. Desalination and Water Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.989921
  6. Duvert, C., Priadi, C. R., Rose, A. M., Abdillah, A., Marthanty, D. R., Gibb, K. S., & Kaestli, M. (2019). Sources and drivers of contamination along an urban tropical river (Ciliwung, Indonesia): Insights from microbial DNA, isotopes and water chemistry. Science of The Total Environment, 682, 382–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.189
  7. Elma, M., Pratiwi, A. E., Rahma, A., Rampun, E. L. A., Mahmud, M., Abdi, C., Rosadi, R., Yanto, D. H. Y., & Bilad, M. R. (2022). Combination of coagulation, adsorption, and ultrafiltration processes for organic matter removal from peat water. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010370
  8. Elsaid, K., Kamil, M., Sayed, E. T., Abdelkareem, M. A., Wilberforce, T., & Olabi, A. (2020). Environmental impact of desalination technologies: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141528
  9. Kirschner, A. Y., Cheng, Y. H., Paul, D. R., Field, R. W., & Freeman, B. D. (2019). Fouling mechanisms in constant flux crossflow ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 574, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.001
  10. Łącki Karol M., Joseph, J., & Eriksson, K. O. (2018). Chapter 32 - Downstream Process Design, Scale-Up Principles, and Process Modeling*. In G. Jagschies, E. Lindskog, K. Łącki, & P. Galliher (Eds.), Biopharmaceutical Processing (pp. 637–674). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100623-8.00032-3
  11. Laksono, S., ElSherbiny, I. M. A., Huber, S. A., & Panglisch, S. (2021). Fouling scenarios in hollow fiber membranes during mini-plant filtration tests and correlation to microalgae-loaded feed characteristics. Chemical Engineering Journal, 420, 127723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127723
  12. Marais, S. S., Ncube, E. J., Msagati, T. A. M., Mamba, B. B., & Nkambule, T. T. I. (2018). Comparison of natural organic matter removal by ultrafiltration, granular activated carbon filtration and full scale conventional water treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(5), 6282–6289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.002
  13. Sadr, S. M. K., & Saroj, D. P. (2015). Membrane technologies for municipal wastewater treatment. In Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment: Materials, Processes and Applications (pp. 443–463). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-121-4.00014-9
  14. Sioutopoulos, D. C., & Karabelas, A. J. (2016). Evolution of organic gel fouling resistance in constant pressure and constant flux dead-end ultrafiltration: Differences and similarities. Journal of Membrane Science, 511, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.057
  15. Yang, W., Guo, Q., Duan, D., Wang, T., Liu, J., Du, X., Liu, Y., & Xia, S. (2022). Characteristics of flat-sheet ceramic ultrafiltration membranes for lake water treatment: A pilot study. Separation and Purification Technology, 289, 120677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120677
  16. Yildiz Töre, G., & Kirhan Sesler, Ş. (2021). Chapter 24 - Developments in membrane bioreactor technologies and evaluation on case study applications for recycle and reuse of miscellaneous wastewaters. In M. P. Shah & S. Rodriguez-Couto (Eds.), Membrane-Based Hybrid Processes for Wastewater Treatment (pp. 503–575). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823804-2.00006-9
  17. Yue, C., Dong, H., Chen, Y., Shang, B., Wang, Y., Wang, S., & Zhu, Z. (2021). Direct Purification of Digestate Using Ultrafiltration Membranes: Influence of Pore Size on Filtration Behavior and Fouling Characteristics. Membranes, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030179

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-16 06:19:01

No citation recorded.