skip to main content

Analyzing the Impact of Internal Factors on MSME Environmental Management for Sustainable Development in Aceh Tamiang Regency

Mechanical Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Samudra University, Meurandeh - Langsa 24416, Aceh, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 12 Dec 2024; Revised: 12 Jul 2025; Accepted: 13 Jul 2025; Available online: 25 Jul 2025; Published: 31 Jul 2025.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

The growth of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) has not been fully supported by the implementation of environmentally sustainable management strategies. This study aims to identify internal factors influencing environmentally friendly waste management among MSMEs and to measure their contribution to sustainable development in Aceh Tamiang Regency. The main focus is to assess how organizational structure, resource management, and environmental awareness within MSMEs affect sustainable empowerment, particularly in sectors that generate waste. The study population consists of 965 waste-producing MSMEs, with a sample of 300 respondents selected using purposive sampling to match the research criteria. Data was collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the assistance of AMOS software. SEM was chosen for its ability to test complex relationships among variables simultaneously and provide strong validity for the theoretical model. The findings show that internal company factors such as demographics, human resources, corporate culture, management practices, marketing, innovation capability, and employee awareness significantly influence MSME empowerment in adopting environmentally friendly practices. Furthermore, this empowerment contributes positively to sustainable development by reducing environmental impacts and improving economic efficiency. These findings are important for policymakers in Aceh Tamiang in designing sustainability-based strategies and policies for the development of local MSMEs.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Internal Environment; Empowerment of MSMEs Based on Environmental Management; Sustainable Development

Article Metrics:

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Berita resmi statistik UKM. Retrieved September 13, 2017, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/16888581/Berita-Resmi-Statistik-Ukm
  2. Lahallo, W., Tanjung, R. H. R., Suharno, S., & Sujarta, P. (2022). Diversity, composition and important tree species for Cenderawasih bird activities in Rhepang Muaif ecotourism forest, Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230219
  3. Rifanjani, S., Listiani, K. A., Muflihati, M., Perdana, D. M., & Marwanto, M. (2024). White-water rafting tourism potential at Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park based on the tourism suitability index. Media Konservasi, 28(3), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.28.3.284-291
  4. Wagner, M. (2015). The link of environmental and economic performance: Drivers and limitations of sustainability integration. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1306-1317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.012
  5. Bank Indonesia. (2017). Website. Retrieved September 18, 2017, from http://www.bi.go.id
  6. Yong, J. Y., Klemeš, J. J., Varbanov, P. S., & Huisingh, D. (2016). Cleaner energy for cleaner production: Modelling, simulation, optimisation and waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 111, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.001
  7. Hariyanto, P. (2017). Bea Cukai dorong pertumbuhan IKM di Aceh. Retrieved from https://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/1201759/34/bea-cukai-dorong-pertumbuhan-ikm-di-aceh-1493707477
  8. Lestari, F., Tua, I. N., Muzanni, A., Nugroho, D. F., Wibowo, A. A., Wartono, T., Widanarko, B., Saepullah, A., Modjo, R., & Farida, M. (2023). NDVI, suitability, and carrying capacity of Dieng Plateau forests to sustain Dieng Kulon Village tourism, Central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 24(1), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240134
  9. Disperindag Aceh Tamiang. (2017). Data pelaku UMKM di Aceh Tamiang
  10. Mukim, M. (2015). Coagglomeration of formal and informal industry: Evidence from India. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(2), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu020
  11. Ahluwalia, J., & Patel, U. (2018). Solid waste management in India: An assessment of resource recovery and environmental impact
  12. Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 735-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.001
  13. Feng, T., & Wang, D. (2016). The influence of environmental management systems on financial performance: A moderated-mediation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-0
  14. Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117, 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.014
  15. Tang, K., Lai, K. H., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). Environmental governance of enterprises and their economic upshot through corporate reputation and customer satisfaction. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(6), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.740
  16. Ortas, E., Moneva, J. M., & Álvarez, I. (2014). Sustainable supply chain and company performance: A global examination. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
  17. Gotschol, P., De Giovanni, P., & Vinzi, V. E. (2014). Is environmental management an economically sustainable business? Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.014

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-08-10 08:24:13

No citation recorded.