skip to main content

Agroforestry-Based Land Rehabilitation in KHDTK UGM: Integration of Multipurpose Species and Renewable Energy Crops

1Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

2Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

3CarbonNature Foundation, Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Received: 7 Aug 2025; Revised: 30 Jun 2026; Accepted: 2 Jul 2026; Available online: 16 Jul 2026; Published: 18 Jul 2026.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

There is currently a problem of land degradation in Indonesia, requiring the rehabilitation of over 12.7 million hectares. Agroforestry has been considered one of the most effective strategies for restoring ecological functions while providing socio-economic benefits to local people. The purpose of this study was to develop an agroforestry-based land rehabilitation strategy for Compartment 5 of KHDTK at Universitas Gadjah Mada, located in Ngawi Regency, East Java, Indonesia, using the CASM model. This study involved assessing both biophysical and socio-institutional aspects in April 2025. Three Land Management Units (LMUs) were identified using the spatial overlay analysis of soil type, slope, rainfall, and land cover. The fieldwork was conducted across 18 plots of land, while socio-economic and property rights issues were collected through semi-structured interviews with locals. The findings indicated that LMU 1 was assigned to Class III Land Capability. However, LMUs 2 and 3 were assigned to Class IV, indicating severe soil limitations due to shallow soil depth, clayey soil, and susceptibility to erosion. Analysis of suitability indicated that Calliandra calothyrsus and Arenga pinnata had marginal suitability (S3) across all three land management units. In contrast, Calophyllum inophyllum adapted better to local conditions and faced fewer soil and climatic limitations. The availability and manageability assessment identified problems with informal land use, inactive local institutions, and poor coordination among stakeholders. These factors allowed for the identification of potential for joint efforts in land rehabilitation through cooperation with KHDTK UGM and other parties. The research results indicate that an agroforestry system based on the cultivation of multipurpose tree species and renewable energy crops has great potential in land rehabilitation planning in KHDTK UGM. A pilot project is suggested.

Keywords: Agroforestry; CASM Framework; Land Rehabilitation; KHDTK UGM; Multipurpose Tree Species

Article Metrics:

  1. Arsyad, S. (2010). Konservasi tanah dan air. IPB Press
  2. Bahri, S., Heriansyah, I., & Mulyana, Y. (2023). Analisis produktivitas dan potensi biomassa Gliricidia sepium pada lahan marginal. Jurnal Agroforestri Indonesia, 5(1), 23–32
  3. Bayrak, M. M., & Marafa, L. M. (2016). Ten years of REDD+: A critical review of the impact of REDD+ on forest-dependent communities. Sustainability, 8(7), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070620
  4. Budiarta, K. (2014). Pemetaan kesesuaian lahan menggunakan sistem informasi geografis (SIG). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, 18(2), 75–84
  5. Bustam, M. A. (2021). Ekonomi pertanian: Dinamika komoditas jagung dan tebu dalam pembangunan pedesaan. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 20(3), 45–57
  6. Cerdan, C. R., Rebolledo, M. C., Soto, G., Rapidel, B., & Sinclair, F. L. (2012). Local knowledge of impacts of tree cover on ecosystem services in smallholder coffee production systems. Agricultural Systems, 110, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.014
  7. Des Gasper. (1999). Logical Framework Analysis: A critical review. ISS Working Paper Series
  8. Eastman, J. R. (2006). IDRISI Andes: Guide to GIS and image processing. Clark Labs, Clark University
  9. Elevitch, C. R., & Francis, J. K. (2005). Gliricidia sepium (gliricidia). In C. R. Elevitch (Ed.), Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), Hōlualoa, Hawai‘i
  10. FAO. (1976). A framework for land evaluation (FAO Soils Bulletin No. 32). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  11. FAO. (2020). Agroforestry and tenure. Forestry Working Paper 14. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb0564en
  12. Fajeriana, F., & Abd Kadir, A. (2020). Pemanfaatan teknologi penginderaan jauh untuk mendukung rehabilitasi hutan dan lahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 8(2), 187–198
  13. Febryano, I. G., Darusman, D., & Rachmat, M. (2009). Penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan kelompok tani hutan dalam pengelolaan hutan berbasis masyarakat. Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, 16(3), 151–158
  14. Funk, C., et al. (2015). The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific Data, 2, 150066. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66
  15. Garrity, D. P. (2004). Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. Agroforestry Systems, 61–62(1–3), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028986.37502.7c
  16. Garrity, D. P., Akinnifesi, F. K., Ajayi, O. C., Sileshi, G., Mowo, J. G., Kalinganire, A., ... & Bayala, J. (2010). Evergreen agriculture: A robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Security, 2(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-010-0070-7
  17. Hakim, L. (2023). Landscape-level forest rehabilitation for biodiversity and rural livelihoods: A case from East Java, Indonesia. Environmental Management and Conservation, 14(2), 56–67
  18. Karyati, K., & Sarminah, S. (2018). Penilaian kesesuaian lahan untuk tanaman pertanian menggunakan metode matching di daerah tangkapan air. Jurnal Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan, 5(1), 643–651
  19. Kusters, K., Buck, L., de Graaf, M., Minang, P. A., van Noordwijk, M., & Wollenberg, E. (2006). Exploring the potential of agroforestry to enhance livelihood security in the tropics. CIFOR and ICRAF Policy Brief
  20. Mujiyo, M., Pratiwi, R. D., & Kurniawan, H. D. (2022). Pengaruh pengelolaan lahan terhadap keberlanjutan usaha tani di lahan kering. Jurnal Pertanian Lahan Kering, 11(1), 33–39
  21. Nair, P. K. R. (2011). Agroforestry systems and environmental quality: Introduction. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40(3), 784–790. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0076
  22. Nguyen, T. T., Mai, V. H., & Nguyen, D. V. (2024). Remote sensing and GIS for land suitability assessment in forest landscape restoration planning. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(3), 120
  23. Nugraha, H., & Saputro, S. (2023). Potensi biomassa Gliricidia sepium sebagai bahan baku bioenergi di lahan marginal. Jurnal Energi Terbarukan, 12(2), 45–52
  24. PUPR. (2017). Peraturan Menteri PUPR Nomor 28/PRT/M/2015 tentang Penetapan Garis Sempadan Sungai dan Danau. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, Indonesia
  25. Raharjo, B., & Larosa, E. (2011). Penggunaan citra satelit untuk perencanaan rehabilitasi hutan dan lahan. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 9–18
  26. Rahman, S. A., Jacobsen, J. B., Healey, J. R., Roshetko, J. M., & Sunderland, T. (2016). Finding alternatives to swidden agriculture: Does agroforestry improve livelihood options and reduce pressure on existing forest? Agroforestry Systems, 90(4), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9842-2
  27. Ritung, S., Wahyuningsih, T., & Subagyo, H. (2011). Petunjuk teknis evaluasi kesesuaian lahan untuk komoditas pertanian. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian, Badan Litbang Pertanian
  28. Ruslan, M., Hermawan, H., & Wulandari, C. (2018). Model rehabilitasi hutan berbasis partisipasi masyarakat. Jurnal Rehabilitasi Hutan dan Konservasi Alam, 5(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.20886/jrh

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-18 02:55:24

No citation recorded.