DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.24.6.1497-1506

Nilai Ekonomi Jasa Habitat Mangrove pada Sistem Tambak Silvofishery

1Program Studi Ekonomi Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia

2Department of Resource and Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management., Indonesia

3Jl. Agatis Gd. FEM W3 L2 Darmaga Bogor 16680, Indonesia

4 Program Studi Manajemen Sumberdaya Perikanan, Fakultas Kelautan dan Perikanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 10 Feb 2026; Revised: 4 Oct 2026; Accepted: 6 Oct 2026; Available online: 2 Nov 2026; Published: 6 Nov 2026.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract
Keberlanjutan ekosistem pesisir penting bagi ketahanan pangan dan kesejahteraan masyarakat yang bergantung pada sumber daya perikanan. Ekosistem mangrove penting dalam menjaga keberlanjutan tersebut dengan memberikan beragam jasa ekosistem. Salah satu jasa yang sulit diungkap nilainya adalah jasa habitat asuhan (nursery ground) bagi berbagai sumber daya perikanan. Namun, ekosistem mangrove menghadapi beragam tantangan, seperti konversi mangrove menjadi tambak konvensional yang menyebabkan berkurangnya dukungan ekosistem terhadap fase awal siklus hidup sumber daya perikanan. Sistem silvofishery menjadi salah satu pendekatan pengelolaan berbasis integrasi ekologi dan produksi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap nilai ekonomi jasa habitat mangrove pada sistem tambak silvofishery melalui metode perubahan produktivitas. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Desa Tanjung Rejo, Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Sumatera Utara, dengan melibatkan 30 responden pembudidaya yang dipilih secara purposive. Analisis menggunakan pendekatan Production Function Approach melalui model fungsi produksi Cobb–Douglas dan Productivity Change Method untuk mengestimasi nilai ekonomi jasa habitat mangrove. Analisis dilakukan dengan mengaitkan perubahan luas mangrove terhadap peningkatan produksi perikanan pada beberapa komoditas budidaya pesisir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan mangrove berasosiasi dengan peningkatan produktivitas beberapa komoditas budidaya dalam sistem silvofishery, sehingga memberikan estimasi nilai ekonomi jasa habitat sebesar Rp92.539.520/ha/tahun pada lokasi penelitian.
Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: mangrove; komoditas perikanan; habitat; silvofishery; metode perubahan produktivitas
Funding: Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP)

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Most cited articles
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENATAAN SANITASI PERKOTAAN MELALUI PROGRAM SANITASI LINGKUNGAN BERBASIS MASYARAKAT DI KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG Daya Dukung Jalur Pendakian Bukit Raya Di Taman Nasional Bukit Baka Raya Kalimantan Barat PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH RUMAH TANGGA DI KECAMATAN DAHA SELATAN Analisis Penyebab Masyarakat Tetap Tinggal di Kawasan Rawan Bencana Gunung Merapi (Studi di Lereng Gunung Merapi Kecamatan Cangkringan, Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta) PERBAIKAN KUALITAS AIR LIMBAH DOMESTIK DENGAN FITOREMEDIASI MENGGUNAKAN KOMBINASI BEBERAPA GULMA AIR: STUDI KASUS KOLAM RETENSI TALANG AMAN KOTA PALEMBANG More cited articles
  1. Aburto-Oropeza O, Ezcurra E, Danemann G, Valdez V, Murray J, Sala E. 2008. Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/
  2. Adrianto L. 2006. Analisis Ekonomi Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Laut. Bogor: PKSPL-IPB
  3. Alam M, Rahman M, Ahmed M, Debrot A, Ahsan M, Verdegem M. 2022. Mangrove forest conservation vs shrimp production: Uncovering a sustainable co-management model and policy solution for mangrove greenbelt development in coastal Bangladesh. For Policy Econ., siap terbit
  4. Alvarez L, Otadoy J. 2023. Economic valuation of mangrove forest ecosystem in Zamboanga City, Philippines. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 5(6). doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9709
  5. Anneboina LR, Kavi Kumar KS. 2017. Economic analysis of mangrove and marine fishery linkages in India. Ecosyst Serv. 24:114–123. doi: 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.02.004
  6. Antwi DE, Kuwornu JKM, Onumah EE, Bhujel RC. 2017. Productivity and constraints analysis of commercial tilapia farms in Ghana. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 38(3):282–290. doi: 10.1016/J.KJSS.2016.12.001
  7. Arifanti VB, Malik A, Novita N, Ilham M, Amin M. 2021. Strategi Optimalisasi Potensi Mitigasi Ekosistem Mangrove Indonesia Dalam Pencapaian Target Emisi
  8. Barbier EB. 2000. Valuing the environment as input: review of applications to mangrove-fishery linkages. Volume ke-35. www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon
  9. Barbier EB, Cox M. 2003. Does economic development lead to mangrove loss? A cross-country analysis. Contemp Econ Policy. 21(4):418–432. doi: 10.1093/cep/byg022
  10. Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr. 81(2):169–193
  11. Barbier EB;, Strand IE. 1998. Valuing mangrove-fishery linkages. A case study of Campeche, Mexico. Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 12(2):151–166. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/154816
  12. Barbier, Heal M Geofrey. 2006. Valuing ecosystem services : toward better environmental decision-making. National Academies Press
  13. Basyuni M, Nasution K, Bimantara Y, Hayati R, Slamet B, Sulistiyono N. 2019a. Mangrove vegetation supports milkfish production in silvofishery pond. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 305. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/305/1/012038
  14. Basyuni M, Nasution K, Bimantara Y, Hayati R, Slamet B, Sulistiyono N. 2019b. Mangrove vegetation supports milkfish production in silvofishery pond. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 305. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/305/1/012038
  15. Basyuni M, Yani P, Hartini KS. 2018. Evaluation of mangrove management through community-based silvofishery in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Di dalam: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Volume ke-122. Institute of Physics Publishing
  16. Beck MW, Heck KL, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern B, Hays CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, et al. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience. 51(8):633–641. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2
  17. Belinda CA, Pribadi R, Ulumuddin YI. 2022. Konektivitas Mangrove dan Terumbu Karang Berdasarkan Komunitas Ikan Karang (Studi Kasus: Kepulauan Mentawai dan Belitung). J Mar Res. 11(4):738–751. doi: 10.14710/jmr.v11i4.32346
  18. Bosire JO, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Walton M, Crona BI, Lewis RR, Field C, Kairo JG, Koedam N. 2008. Functionality of restored mangroves: A review. Aquat Bot. 89(2):251–259. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUABOT.2008.03.010
  19. Bosma R, Nguyen T, Siahainenia A, Tran H, Tran H. 2016. Shrimp-based livelihoods in mangrove silvo-aquaculture farming systems. Rev Aquac. 8:43–60. doi: 10.1111/raq.12072
  20. Chang Z, Neori A, He Y, Li J, Qiao L, Preston S, Liu P, Li J. 2020. Development and current state of seawater shrimp farming, with an emphasis on integrated multi-trophic pond aquaculture farms, in China – a review. Rev Aquac. 12:2544–2558. doi: 10.1111/raq.12457
  21. Chong VC. 2007. MANGROVES-FISHERIES LINKAGES-THE MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE. Bull Mar Sci. 80(3):755–772
  22. Chowdhury A, Naz A, Maiti S. 2024. Community-based, cost-effective multispecies mangrove restoration innovation to maximize soil blue carbon pool and humic acid and fulvic acid concentrations at Indian Sundarbans. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int., siap terbit
  23. Duke NC., Bochove J-W van. 2014. The importance of mangroves to people : a call to action. United Nations Environment Programme
  24. Eastwood, Nijnik, Brooker, Pakeman, Artz, Norton, Ross, Bullock, Vellinga, Albon, et al. 2013. Nature conservation and ecosystem service delivery Eastwood, A) Nature conservation and ecosystem service delivery. www.jncc.defra.gov.uk
  25. Fao. 2017. THE STATE OF WORLD FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE 2012. www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm
  26. Faunce CH,, J. E. Serafy. 2006. Mangroves as fish habitat: 50 years of field studies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 318:1–18
  27. Freeman AM, Herriges JA, Kling CL. 2014. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Ed ke-3. RFF Press
  28. Getzner M, Islam MS. 2020. Ecosystem services of mangrove forests: Results of a meta-analysis of economic values. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(16):1–13. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165830
  29. Giri C, Ochieng E, Tieszen LL, Zhu Z, Singh A, Loveland T, Masek J, Duke N. 2011. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 20(1):154–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x
  30. Groot De, Brendan Fisher, Mike Christie. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations
  31. Hamilton SE, Casey D. 2016. Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Global Ecology and Biogeography. 25(6):729–738. doi: 10.1111/geb.12449
  32. Hamzah A, Marzuki M, Nurhasanah N, Nurmawati S. 2023. Environmental risk analysis in mangrove and crab conservation areas in Pamusian Village due to land use change in Tarakan City. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education. 4(2). doi: 10.55681/jige.v4i2.905
  33. Harefa MS, Nasution Z, Mulya MB, Maksum A. 2022. Silvofishery: In What Mangrove Coverage Condition Can this System Provide Benefits for the Community? Univers J Agric Res. 10(3):249–265. doi: 10.13189/ujar.2022.100307
  34. Hastuti E, Budihastuti R. 2016. Potential of mangrove seedlings for utilization in the maintenance of environmental quality within silvofishery ponds. Biotropia: The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Biology. 23:58–63. doi: 10.11598/btb.2016.23.1.606
  35. Hastuti E, Hastuti R. 2018. Growth characteristics of mangrove seedling in silvofishery pond: The allometric relationship of height, diameter and leaf abundance. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 130. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/130/1/012015
  36. Hidayatullah M, Umroni A. 2013. PERTUMBUHAN BAKAU (Rhizophora mucronata Lamk) DAN PRODUKTIVITAS SILVOFISHERY DI KABUPATEN KUPANG
  37. Hutchison J, Spalding M, Zu Ermgassen P. 2014. THE ROLE OF MANGROVES IN FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT. Cambridge, UK. www.nature.org
  38. Istiqlal Amien, E. Runtunuwu, E. Susanti, E. Surmaini. 2011. Goncangan Iklim Mengancam Ketahanan Pangan Nasional. PANGAN. 20(2):121–132
  39. Jamizan A, Chong V. 2017. Demersal fish and shrimp abundance in relation to mangrove hydrogeomorphological metrics. Sains Malays. 46(1):9–19. doi: 10.17576/jsm-2017-4601-02
  40. Jiang L, Hardee K. 2011. How do Recent Population Trends Matter to Climate Change? Popul Res Policy Rev. 30(2):287–312. doi: 10.1007/s11113-010-9189-7
  41. Jolly C, Nyandat B, Yang Z, Ridler N, Matias F, Zhang Z, Murekezi P, Menezes A. 2023. Dynamics of aquaculture governance. J World Aquac Soc., siap terbit
  42. Khanjani MH, Sharifinia M. 2021. Production of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus reared in a limited water exchange system: The effect of different light levels. Aquaculture. 542:736912. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2021.736912
  43. KKP. 2024. Capaian Kinerja Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Tahun 2020 – 2024
  44. Kumar P. 2012. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Routledge
  45. Lapolo N, Utina R, Baderan D. 2018. Diversity and density of crabs in degraded mangrove area at Tanjung Panjang Nature Reserve in Gorontalo, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 19:1154–1159. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190351
  46. Lee SY, Dittmann S. 2008. Managing mangroves with benthic biodiversity in mind: Moving beyond roving banditry. J Sea Res. 59(1–2):1. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2007.07.001
  47. Lefcheck J, Hughes B, Johnson A, Pfirrmann B, Rasher D, Smyth A, Williams B, Beck M, Orth R. 2019. Are coastal habitats important nurseries? A meta-analysis. Conserv Lett. 12. doi: 10.1111/conl.12645
  48. M. Brander L, J. Wagtendonk A, S. Hussain S, McVittie A, Verburg PH, de Groot RS, van der Ploeg S. 2012. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: A meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.003
  49. Macusi E, Estor D, Borazon E, Clapano M, Santos M. 2022. Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Shrimp Farming in the Philippines: A Critical Analysis Using PRISMA. Sustainability., siap terbit
  50. Maja MM, Ayano SF. 2021. The Impact of Population Growth on Natural Resources and Farmers’ Capacity to Adapt to Climate Change in Low-Income Countries. Earth Systems and Environment. 5(2):271–283. doi: 10.1007/s41748-021-00209-6
  51. Matsui N, Meepol W, Chukwamdee J. 2015. Soil organic carbon in mangrove ecosystems with different vegetation and sedimentological conditions. J Mar Sci Eng. 3(4):1404–1424. doi: 10.3390/jmse3041404
  52. Men’endez P, Losada I, Torres-Ortega S, Narayan S, Beck M. 2020. The Global Flood Protection Benefits of Mangroves. Sci Rep. 10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61136-6
  53. Molotoks A, Stehfest E, Doelman J, Albanito F, Fitton N, Dawson TP, Smith P. 2018. Global projections of future cropland expansion to 2050 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Glob Chang Biol. 24(12):5895–5908. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14459
  54. Mumby PJ. 2006. Connectivity of reef fish between mangroves and coral reefs: Algorithms for the design of marine reserves at seascape scales. Biol Conserv. 128(2):215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.042
  55. Nozarpour R, Shojaei M, Naderloo R, Nasi F. 2023. Crustaceans functional diversity in mangroves and adjacent mudflats of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Mar Environ Res. 186:105919. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105919
  56. Ogunremi J, Dauda A, Akor F. 2020. Methods of improving the quality of fish seed supply to fish farmers in Benue State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production., siap terbit
  57. Páez-Osuna F. 2001. The Environmental Impact of Shrimp Aquaculture: Causes, Effects, and Mitigating Alternatives. Environ Manage. 28:131–140. doi: 10.1007/s002670010212
  58. Primavera JH. 1997. Socio-economic impacts of siirimp cuiture. Aquaculttjre Research. 28:815–827. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.1997.00946.x
  59. Primavera JH. 2000. Development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: institutional issues. Volume ke-35. www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon
  60. Primavera JH. 2005. Mangroves, fishponds, and the quest for sustainability. Science (1979). 310(5745):57–59
  61. Putra R, others. 2025. Prospects for Mangrove Reforestation Using the Silvofishery Method in Aquaculture Areas in Bireuen Regency, Aceh. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia., siap terbit
  62. Renstra. 2020. Rencana Strategis 2020-2024. Kemenko Bidang Kemaritiman dan Investasi., siap terbit
  63. Rönnbäck P, Crona B, Ingwall L. 2007. The return of ecosystem goods and services in replanted mangrove forests: Perspectives from local communities in Kenya. Environ Conserv. 34(4):313–324. doi: 10.1017/S0376892907004225
  64. Rusdianti K, Sunito S. 2012. KONVERSI LAHAN HUTAN MANGROVE SERTA UPAYA PENDUDUK LOKAL DALAM MEREHABILITASI EKOSISTEM MANGROVE Mangrove Forest Conservation and The Role of Local Community in Mangrove Ecosytems Rehabilitations
  65. Sathirathai S. 1998. Economic Valuation of Mangroves and the Roles of Local Communities in the Conservation of Natural Resources: Case Study of Surat Thani, South of Thailand. http://203.116.43.77/publications/research1/ACF9E.html
  66. Seary RCO. 2019. Mangroves, fisheries and community livelihoods
  67. Sheaves M. 2005. Nature and consequences of biological connectivity in mangrove systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 302:293–305. doi:doi:10.3354/meps302293
  68. Shikuku K, Tran N, Joffre O, Islam A, Barman B, Ali S, Rossignoli C. 2021. Lock-ins to the dissemination of genetically improved fish seeds. Agric Syst. 188:103042. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103042
  69. Simanungkalit NM, Letari W. 2012. Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Wilayah Pesisir Desa Tanjung Rejo Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan Kabupaten Deli Serdang (1990-2011). Geografi. 4(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v4i2.8067
  70. Spalding, Mark D, Leal M. 2021. The State of the World’s Mangroves 2021. Global Mangrove Alliance
  71. Su J, Friess D, Gasparatos A. 2021. A meta-analysis of the ecological and economic outcomes of mangrove restoration. Nat Commun. 12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25349-1
  72. Suyono, Fithor A. 2025a. Innovative silvofishery model in restored mangrove forests: A 10-year assessment. Heliyon. 11. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42043
  73. Suyono, Fithor A. 2025b. Innovative silvofishery model in restored mangrove forests: A 10-year assessment. Heliyon. 11(2). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42043
  74. Syanya F, Mahadevan H, Khanna A, Mathia W, Mumina P, Litabas J, Sifuna C. 2024. Biosecurity protocols and fish health management in Kenyan fish hatcheries: a key to sustainable production of quality fish seed. Marine and Fishery Sciences., siap terbit
  75. Vicent OA, Alavaisha E, Limbu SM. 2025. Nursing Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry in cages improves growth performance, feed efficiency, condition factor, and growth pattern for stock enhancement. J Great Lakes Res. 51(4):102587. doi: 10.1016/J.JGLR.2025.102587
  76. Whitfield A. 2017. The role of seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, salt marshes and reed beds as nursery areas and food sources for fishes in estuaries. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 27:75–110. doi: 10.1007/s11160-016-9454-x
  77. Wulandari N, Bimantara Y, Sulistiyono N, Slamet B, Amelia R, Basyuni M. 2022. Dynamic System for Silvofishery Pond Feasibility in North Sumatera, Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol., siap terbit
  78. Yulianto G. 2017. DESAIN KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN TERPADU MANGROVE DAN PERIKANAN (STUDI KASUS DI KABUPATEN INDRAMAYU, JAWA BARAT). Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-11-06 21:29:05

No citation recorded.