skip to main content

Effectiveness of Combined Gravel and Silica Sand at Varying Contact Filtration Times for Coffee Processing Wastewater Pollutant Removal

1University of Jember, Indonesia

2Department of Agriculture, Politeknik Negeri Banyuwangi, Jalan Raya Jember - Banyuwangi Km. 13, Labanasem, Kecamatan Kabat, Kabupaten Banyuwangi, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 68461, Indonesia

3Program Study of Agro-Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, University of Jember, Indonesia

4 Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Borneo Tarakan, Indonesia

5 Department of Agriculture, University of Teuku Umar, Aceh, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 11 Mar 2026; Revised: 20 Aug 2026; Accepted: 21 Aug 2026; Available online: 30 Aug 2026; Published: 1 Sep 2026.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract
Variations in filtration media and hydraulic retention time are important factors in optimizing wastewater quality improvement. The objective of this study is to recommend the optimal height level of gravel and silica sand (SiO2) combination and contact time in physical treatment methods for improving the quality of coffee processing wastewater. Three height-level variations of the gravel–silica sand filtration media combination were tested, namely 10:5 cm (T1), 7.5:7.5 cm (T2), and 5:10 cm (T3), along with two flow rate variations of 5.5 mL/second and 9.5 mL/second. All treatments were conducted in three replications to determine the standard error of the experimental data. The best-performing treatment was a combination of 5 cm gravel and 10 cm silica sand (T3) at a flow rate of 5.5 mL/second, which reduced turbidity, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), ammonia (NH3), and phosphate (PO4) by 61.65±1.43%, 49.00±6.66%, 50.66±4.35%, 53.75±4.35%, and 76.99±4.54%, respectively, at a hydraulic retention time of 4 hours. The height level of the gravel and silica sand (SiO2) media, along with the optimum hydraulic retention time, had a positive effect on reducing pollutant content in coffee processing wastewater.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Cover Letter
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (97KB)    Indexing metadata
 Research Instrument
Article No Name
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (583KB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: coffee wastewater processing; filtration; hydraulic retention times (HRT); physical treatment

Article Metrics:

  1. Anggarini S., Hidayat N., Sunyoto N.M.S., Wulandari P.S. 2015. Optimization of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and inoculums addition in wastewater treatment using anaerobic digestion system. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.020
  2. Alftessi S.A., Othman M.H.D., Adam M.R., Farag T.M., Ismail A.F., Rahman M.A., Jaafar J., Habib M.A., Raji Y.O., Hubadillah S.K. 2021. Novel silica sand hollow fiber ceramic membrane for oily wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9 (1), 104975
  3. Asefaw K.T., Asaithambi P., Tegegn M. 2024. Treatment of wet coffee processing wastewater using a pulsed-electrocoagulation process: optimization using response surface technique. Applied Water Science, 14 (54). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02118-1
  4. Benhabiles O., Chekir N., Tassalit D., Madjene F., Mahidine S., Saci M. 2022. Improving sand filtration of municipal wastewater pre-treatment by optimization using local Algerian media. Desalination and Water Treatment, 279, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.29062
  5. Campos R.C., Pinto V.R.A., Melo L.F., Da Rocha S.J.S.S., Coimbra J.S. 2021. New sustainable perspectives for coffee wastewater and other by-products: a critical review. Future Food, 4, 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100058
  6. Cruz-Salomon A., Rios-Vadovinos E., Pola-Albores F., Lagunas-Rivera S., Meza-Gordillo R., Ruiz-Valdiviezo V. 2018. Evaluation of hydraulic retention time on treatment of coffee processing wastewater (CPWW) in EGSB bioreactor. Sustainability, 10 (1), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010083
  7. Environmental Ministry of Indonesia Republic. 2014. Wastewater Quality Standard No. 5/2014. Jakarta. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/322442/permen-lh-no-5-tahun-2014 (Accessed in January 2025)
  8. Fitriani F., Arifin B., Ismono H. 2021. Indonesian coffee exports and its relation to global market integration. Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, 4 (1), 120–133
  9. Fitriani N., Wahyudianto F.E., Salsabila N.F., Mohamed R.M.S.R., Kurniawan S.B. 2023. Performance of modified slow sand filter to reduce turbidity, total suspended solids, and iron in river water as water treatment in disaster areas. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/156009
  10. Guerrero-Brontons M., Purejo N., Romani A.M., Gomez R. 2024. Advantages of using a carbon-rich substrate in a constructed wetland for agricultural water treatment: carbon availability and biota development. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 360, 108792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108792
  11. Gururaj A., Kumar B.M., Achyuth K.N., Manoj B.R. 2021. Coffee processing wastewater management: an overview. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 20 (11), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2021/v20i1117405
  12. Ijanu E.M., Kamaruddin M.A., Norashiddin F.A. 2020. Coffee processing wastewater treatment: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Applied Water Science, 10 (11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1091-9
  13. Kato S., Kansha Y. 2024. Comprehensive review of industrial wastewater treatment techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 51064–51097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34584-0
  14. Kubo A., Kawarasaki K., Hara. 2022. Silica removal at sewage treatment plants causes new silica deficiency. Scientific Reports, 12 (8141). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12272-8
  15. Lemma D.B., Debebe W.A. 2023. Wet coffee processing wastewater treatment by using an integrated constructed wetland. Desalination and Water Treatment, 304, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2023.29841
  16. León-Becerril E., García-Camacho J.E., Real-Olvera J.D., Lopez-Lopez A. 2016. Performance of an up-flow anaerobic filter in the treatment of cold meat industry wastewater. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 102, 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.04.016
  17. Mažeikienė A., Sarko J. 2022. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater using layered filter media. Sustainability, 14 (17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710713
  18. Novita E., Wahyuningsih S., Andika M., Pradana H.A. 2023. Water hyacinth potential in the pollution impact reduction of coffee agroindustry wastewater. Journal of Pollution Prevention Technology Research, 14 (2), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.21771/jrtppi.2023.v14.no2.p10-22
  19. Ong S.K. 2018. Wastewater engineering – Chapter 12. In Handbook of Environmental Engineering. John Wiley & Sons Publishing, Hoboken, New Jersey
  20. Rehman A., Ayub N., Naz I., Perveen I., Ahmed S. 2020. Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the performance of a pilot-scale trickling filter system treating low-strength domestic wastewater. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29 (1), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/98998
  21. Rondhi M., Nugroho H., Soetrino S., Mori Y. 2024. Segmented market of Indonesian coffee exports to international market: RFM approach. Journal of Coffee and Sustainability, 1 (2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jcs.2024.01.02.05
  22. Seidmohammadi A., Asgari G., Rahmani A., Ghelichi F. 2021. Performance of direct filtration with multi-media filters for reuse of wastewater treatment plant effluent: a case study. Desalination and Water Treatment, 229, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2021.27388
  23. Sengupta S., Nawaz T., Beaudry J. 2015. Nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from wastewater. Current Pollution Reports, 1, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-015-0013-1
  24. Sheng L., Zhang Y., Tang F., Liu S. 2018. Mesoporous/microporous silica materials: preparation from natural sands and highly efficient fixed-bed adsorption of methylene blue in wastewater. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 257, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.023
  25. Syifahati T., Triska A., Nahar J. 2021. Forecasting the Indonesian coffee production and consumption using the modified golden section search to estimate the smoothing parameters. Journal of Integrative Mathematics, 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v19.n1.44573.41-54
  26. Warmadewanthi I., Larasati A. 2020. The effect of SiO₂ on phosphate and ammonium recovery from fertilizer wastewater. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 46, 4781–4791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-020-04248-y
  27. Xia Z., Cai W., Zhang J., Sun W., Jiang Z., Li Y., Ao Z., Chen H., Liu G., Qi L., Wang H. 2023. Optimization on structure and operation parameters of biofilter for decentralized sewage treatment. Environmental Research, 219, 115004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.115004
  28. Yahya H., Rahman A., Izarna S.R., Aida N. 2023. The simple filtration unit in reducing parameters of restaurant wastewater. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1263, 012053. https://doi.org10.1088/1755-1315/1263/1/012053
  29. Yaseen Z.M., Zigale T.T., Kumar D.R., Sinan Q., Salih, Awasthi S., Tung T.M., Al-Ansari N., Bhagat S.K. 2019. Laundry wastewater treatment using a combination of sand filter, bio-char and teff straw media. Scientific Reports, 9 (18709). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54888-3
  30. Zuhdi F., Asshagab S.M., Rambe K.R., Destiarni R.P. 2024. The competitiveness and export performance of Indonesian coffee in the organization of Islamic cooperation (OIC). Integrated Journal of Business and Economics, 8 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.33019/ijbe.v8i3.939

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-05 04:10:19

No citation recorded.