Managerial Accountability in Village Fund Management

*Ida Hayu Dwimawanti  -  Public Administration Study Program, Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Amni Zarkasyi Rahman  -  Public Administration Study Program, Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Rafa’ Fazlur Rahman  -  Public Administration Study Program, Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto SH Tembalang, Semarang, 1269, Indonesia, Indonesia
Published: 20 Dec 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Abstract

Village Funds are funds sourced from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget intended for villages which are transferred through the district revenue and expenditure budget and then channelled to the village treasury account and used to finance the implementation of development and community empowerment. The Village Fund has village development goals, namely improving the quality of human life, improving village welfare, and reducing poverty. This study aims to analyze the Managerial Accountability of Village Fund Management in Rejosari Village, Pringsurat Subdistrict, Temanggung Regency. This study used qualitative research methods with eight informants as the research subject. The results of the study show that the Managerial Accountability of Village Fund Management in Rejosari Village, Pringsurat Subdistrict, Temanggung Regency has not demonstrated effective results. Several indicators of Managerial Accountability that have not been implemented optimally further support this conclusion. Meanwhile, the factors that influence accountability such as the personal factor, leadership factor, team factor, and contextual factor are sufficient, although obstacles are still apparent. Based on this conclusion, the researchers recommended the village fund administrators to be highly committed and maximizing the support of existing resources to the maximum.

 

Keywords: Village Funds; Managerial Accountability; Development; Community Empowerment

Article Metrics:

  1. Agustino, L. (2008). Dasar-dasar kebijakan publik: Bandung: Alfabeta
  2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications
  3. Day, I., & Blakey, J. (2012). Challenging coaching: Going beyond traditional coaching to face the FACTS: Hachette UK
  4. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California management review, 41(2): 79-94 (doi: 10.2307/41165987),[Online]
  5. Gaspersz, V. (2004). Perencanaan Strategik untuk Peningkatan Kinerja Sektor Publik: Suatu Petunjuk Praktek. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  6. Hasniati, H. (2017). Model Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 2(1): 15-30, [Online]. Retrieved from http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jakpp/article/view/1519 [Accessed May 18, 2018]
  7. Kawamura, K. (2011). Consensus and democracy in Indonesia: Musyawarah-Mufakat revisited
  8. Kloot, L. (1999). Performance measurement and accountability in Victorian local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(7): 565-584 (doi: 10.1108/09513559910308039),[Online]
  9. KPK. (2015). Laporan Hasil Kajian Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
  10. Kumalasari, D., & Riharjo, I. B. (2016). Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Desa dalam Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa. Jurnal ilmu dan riset akuntansi, 5(11): 1-15, [Online]. Retrieved from https://adoc.tips/transparansi-dan-akuntabilitas-pemerintah-desa-dalam-pengeloef51183f1697d9fd5d75b5ede0deae951910.html [Accessed May 18, 2018]
  11. Kumorotomo, W. (2005). Akuntabilitas birokrasi publik: sketsa pada masa transisi. Published in collaboration with the Masters in Public Administration of UGM and Pustaka Pelajar Publisher: Yogyakarta
  12. Mahmudi, M. (2010). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik: Yogyakarta: UPP-STIM YKPN
  13. Mintzberg, H. (1971). Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management science, 18(2): B97-B110 (doi: 1287/mnsc.18.2.B97),[Online]
  14. Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, p. 103
  15. Putriyanti, A. (2012). Penerapan Otonomi Desa dalam Menguatkan Akuntabilitas Pemerintahan Desa dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Desa Aglik Kecematan Grabag Kabupaten Purworejo. Yogyakarta: UNY
  16. Rahman, A. Z., & Novitasari, D. (2018). KEBIJAKAN PEMBANGUNAN DESA MELALUI PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR TRANSPORTASI DALAM UPAYA PEMERATAAN PEMBANGUNAN DI DESA PLESUNGAN KECAATAN KAPAS KABUPATEN BOJONEGORO. GEMA PUBLICA, 3(2): 85-91 (doi: 10.14710/gp.3.2.2018.85-91),[Online]
  17. Rihandoyo, R., & Rahman, A. Z. (2016). EVALUASI KESELARASAN KEBIJAKAN PEMBANGUAN ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT ANTARA PEMERINTAH PUSAT, PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH, DAN KABUPATEN/ KOTA ( KOTA TEGAL DAN KABUPATEN BATANG). JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL, 13(2): 45-50 (doi: 10.14710/jis.13.2.2014.45-50),[Online]
  18. Semiawan, C. R. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Grasindo

Last update: 2021-03-06 09:00:55

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-03-06 09:00:55

No citation recorded.