Youthizen Political Literacy: Educating The Generation Z

*Nuriyatul Lailiyah  -  Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ghozian Aulia Pradhana  -  Department of Media and Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
Muchammad Yuliyanto  -  Department of Communication, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Published: 9 Feb 2020.
Open Access
Citation Format:
This study aims to investigate the differences in attitudes of young generation in showing their
political expression on social media before and after the socialization in community service. The
issue is related to the attitude of young generation in using social media as a means of expres-
sion. Meanwhile, we realize that the internet can often be misleading with the abundance of in-
formation and hoaxes. It requires the user’s ability to choose and filter the correct and useful
information. As the generation that dominates social media and the internet, Generation Z is al-
so a target of politicians and political issues on the internet. Therefore, political literacy for
young generation in the internet is crucial. The data in this research were collected by quantita-
tive descriptive methods through surveys before and after the socialization of social media and
politics. The survey was conducted on 100 high school students in Semarang City. The results
showed that the program for political literacy socialization increased the political literacy of the
high school students by providing a positive knowledge regarding politics. The results showed
that the program increased the high school students’ political literacy and attitude towards the
use of social media for political expression.
Keywords: Generation Z; Political literacy; Politics; Socialization; Social media

Article Metrics:

  1. Ayun, Primada Qurrota. (2016). Penggunaan Instant Messenger dan Komunikasi Interpersonal Remaja. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 15(2): 111–20 (doi: 10.14710/jis.15.2.2016.111-120),[Online]
  2. Bennet, S. & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (5): 321-331 (doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x),[Online]
  3. Biswas, Aindrila., Ingle, Nikhil., & Roy, Mousumi. (2014). Influence of Social Media on Voting Behavior. Journal of Power, Politics & Governance, 2(2): 127-155, [Online]
  4. Facal, Gabriel. (2019). Islamic Defenders Front Militia (Front Pembela Islam) and Its Impact on Growing Religious Intolerance in Indonesia. Trans-Regional and –National Studies of Southeast Asia, (January): 1–22 (doi: 10.1017/trn.2018.15),[Online]
  5. Hasfi, Nurul, Sunyoto Usmand, and Pudjo Santosa. (2017). Anonimitas Di
  6. Media Sosial: Sarana Kebebasan Berekspresi atau Patologi Demokrasi?
  7. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15 (1): 28–38 [online]. Retrieved from [Accessed May 20, 2018]
  8. Howe, N. & Nadler, R. (2012). WHY GENERATIONS MATTER: Ten Findings from Life Course Research on the Workforce [online]. Retrieved from [Accessed on 9 November 2017]
  9. Lailiyah, Nuriyatul. (2016). Presentasi Diri Netizen dalam Konstruksi Identitas di Media Sosial dan Kehidupan Nyata. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial 15(2): 103–10 (doi: 10.14710/jis.15.2.2016.103-110[Online]
  10. Lailiyah, Nuriyatul, Much Yuliyanto, and Ghozian Aulia Pradhana. (2018). Youthizen, Political Literacy, and Social Media. In E3S Web of Conferences73, 14005 ICENIS 2018, EDP Sciences, 20–23 (doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20187314005),[Online]
  11. Littlejohn, Stephen W & Karen Foss. (2008). Theories of Human Communication (9th Ed.). Bellmont, California: Wadsworth
  12. Mowen, John C. & Michael Minor. (2002). Perilaku Konsumen Jilid I. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
  13. O’ Keefe, D. J. (2009). Theories of Persuasion. in Oliver, M. B. & R. Nabi (Eds.). (2009), Handbook of media effects. California: Sage Publications
  14. O’Keefe, D.J. (2008). Elaboration Likelihood Model. In Donsbach, Wolfgang (Ed). International encyclopedia of communication Vol IV.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
  15. Perbawani, Pulung S, and Irham N Anshari. (2018). Online Political Participation and Netizen Anonymity In Indonesia’s Digital Democracy. Journal Power Conflict Democracy. 6(2): 185–212 (doi: 10.22146/pcd.41905),[Online]
  16. Santosa, Hedi Pudjo, Nurul Hasfi, and Triyono Lukmantoro. (2018). Digital Media Unequality during the 2014th Indonesian Presidential Election. In
  17. proceeding E3S Web Conf. Volume 73, 2018. The 3rd International
  18. Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (doi: 10.1051e3sconf/20187314006),[Online]

Last update: 2021-03-02 18:53:26

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-03-02 18:53:27

No citation recorded.