DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.22.1.2023.68-96

The Paradox of Public Service Innovation amid Regional Autonomy in Indonesia

*R. Slamet Santoso  -  Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Hardi Warsono  -  Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Retno Sunu Astuti  -  Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ida Hayu Dwimawanti  -  Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Law No. 23/2014 on the Local Government aims at fostering local governments in the country to nurture a culture of innovation to improve the quality of public services. This research attempts to discover paradoxes in the Surakarta City Government related to regulations governing local governments in Indonesia in developing public service innovation. This study uses a qualitative methodology with descriptive analysis related to the paradoxical evidence of public service innovation capacity in the Surakarta City government. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and literature studies of reputable journals. Furthermore, interviews were conducted with resource persons, from top management leaders to innovation actors, with a total of ten people. We utilised the analysis framework of Public Sector Innovation Capacity Management by Kim and Lee to analyse the results. We used SWOT analysis to devise a public service innovation capacity management strategy in Surakarta City. The results prove that the Surakarta City government has different characteristics in developing public service innovation. However, there is a paradox, which is a contradiction in the course of the local government in general. This paradox is evident in two main phenomena. First, there were no particular government regulations. Second, regional apparatus organisations (OPD) practice less collaborative mechanisms. By contrast, we found that entrenched innovation DNA and an external driver of innovation support the creation of public service innovations in the Surakarta City Government.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Public Service Innovation; Public Service Innovation Capacity; The Paradox of Public Service Innovation; Public Sector Innovation Strategy

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme More cited articles
  1. Al-husseini, S., Beltagi, I. El, & Moizer, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovation : the mediating role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 00(00): 1–24. (doi: 10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381),[Online]
  2. Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696–717 (doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406),[Online]
  3. Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing Innovation in The Public Sector: Aligning Innovation Measurement with Policy Goals. Research Policy, 48(3): 789–798 (doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001),[Online]
  4. Asmorowati, S., Schubert, V., & Ningrum, A. P. (2022). Policy capacity, local autonomy, and human agency: tensions in the intergovernmental coordination in Indonesia’s social welfare response amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(2): 213–227 (doi: 10.1080/17516234.2020.1869142),[Online]
  5. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability – Rigidity. Journal of Marketing, 69(October): 61–83 (doi: 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61),[Online]
  6. Brimhall, K. C. (2021). Are We Innovative? Increasing Perceptions of Nonprofit Innovation Through Leadership, Inclusion, and Commitment
  7. Brogaard, L. (2017). The impact of innovation training on successful outcomes in public–private partnerships. Public Management Review, 19(8): 1184–1205 (doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1272710),[Online]
  8. Budiarti Hayuningtyas, P., Matsunami, J., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Influencing Factors of Innovation in Surakarta City Government, Central Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 18(2): 233–257 (doi: 10.36762/jurnaljateng.v18i2.836),[Online]
  9. Capuno, J. J. (2010). Leadership and innovation under decentralization: A case study of selected local governments in the Philippines
  10. Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2): 264–290 (doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477),[Online]
  11. Costa-Font, J., & Turati, G. (2018). Regional healthcare decentralization in unitary states: equal spending, equal satisfaction? Regional Studies, 52(7): 974–985 (doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1361527),[Online]
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications
  13. Cunha, M. P. e., & Putnam, L. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1): 95–106 (doi: 10.1177/1476127017739536),[Online]
  14. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in The Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1): 146–166 (doi: 10.1111/padm.12209),[Online]
  15. Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2019). Public sector innovation: the effect of universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2): 596–614 (doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9636-2),[Online]
  16. Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1) (doi: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036),[Online]
  17. Eastwood, C. (2016). Using a SWOT Analysis: Taking a Look at Your Organization
  18. Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6): 1105–1135 (doi: 10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0190),[Online]
  19. García-morales, V. J., Jiménez-barrionuevo, M. M., & Gutiérrez-gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership in fl uence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation ☆. Journal of Business Research, 65(7): 1040–1050 (doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005),[Online]
  20. H.D Stout, V. (2004). Hukum Administrasi Negara
  21. Halimah, H., Bagea, I., Indah Rusli, T., Nasir, N., Abubakar, A., & Takdir, M. (2022). What Leader should Do in Keeping Staff? Simplification of Human Resources Management Theory. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 3(1): 84–101 (doi: 10.51454/jet.v3i1.144):[Online]
  22. HR, R. (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara (Edisi Revi). PT RAJA GRAFINDO INDONESIA
  23. Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2009). The impact of management capacity on government innovation in Korea: An empirical study. International Public Management Journal, 12(3): 345–369 (doi: 10.1080/10967490903103334),[Online]
  24. Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., Santoso, A. D., & Fathin, C. A. (2019). What shapes public sector innovation? Public Policy and Administration, 18(4): 430–446 (doi: 10.13165/VPA-19-18-4-05),[Online]
  25. Kyriacou, A. P., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2019). Local Decentralization and the Quality of Public Services in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 145(2): 755–776 (doi: 10.1007/s11205-019-02113-z),[Online]
  26. Lapod, J. (2016). Analisis Penentuan Strategi….. (Lapod) 33. 33–48
  27. Lapuente, V. (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 1970, 1–15 (doi: 10.1111/gove.12502),[Online]
  28. Lindsay, C., Findlay, P., McQuarrie, J., Bennie, M., Corcoran, E. D., & Van Der Meer, R. (2018). Collaborative Innovation, New Technologies, and Work Redesign. Public Administration Review, 78(2): 251–260 (doi: 10.1111/puar.12843),[Online]
  29. Mergeani, N., Cojocaru, A., & Vijulie, C. J. (2022). The Multidimensionality of the Concepts of Human Resources , Labor Resources and Human Capital in Economic Theory. 73: 9–20
  30. Mergel, I. (2018). Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov. Public Management Review, 20(5): 726–745 (doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044),[Online]
  31. Minton, G. (2010). Using a SWOT Analysis. Mortgage Banking, 80–81
  32. Momeni, M., Nielsen, S. B., & Kafash, M. H. (2015). Determination of Innovation Capability of Organizations: Qualitative Meta Synthesis and Delphi Method. Proceedings of RESER2015 - Innovative Services in the 21st Century Publication. http://orbit.dtu.dk/files/116283301/Determination_of_Innovation_Capability.pdf
  33. Mutiarin, D. H. A. P. E. and D. (2018). Analisis Best Practice Inovasi Pelayanan Publik (Studi pada Inovasi Pelayanan “Kumis MbahTejo” di Kecamatan Tegalrejo Kota Yogyakarta)
  34. Namugenyi, C., Nimmagadda, S. L., & Reiners, T. (2019). Design of a SWOT analysis model and its evaluation in diverse digital business ecosystem contexts. Procedia Computer Science, 159: 1145–1154 (doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.283),[Online]
  35. Osborne, S., Brandsen, T., Mele, V., Nemec, J., Van, M., & Flemig, S. (2019). Risking innovation . Understanding risk and public service innovation — evidence from a four nation study. Public Money & Management, 0(0): 1–11 (doi: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051),[Online]
  36. Pratama, A. B. (2020). The landscape of public service innovation in Indonesia: A comprehensive analysis of its characteristic and trend. Innovation and Management Review, 17(1): 25–40 (doi: 10.1108/INMR-11-2018-0080),[Online]
  37. Rivai, V. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan
  38. Rumanti, A. A., Samadhi, T. M. A. A., Wiratmadja, I. I., & Sunaryo, I. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review on Knowledge Sharing for Innovation : Empirical Study Approach. 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), 504–509 (doi: 10.1109/IEA.2018.8387153),[Online]
  39. Santoso, R. S., Lestari, H., & Rostyaningsih, D. (2021). A Portrait of the Capacity of Public Service Innovation in the Surakarta City Government. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Indonesian Social and Political Enquiries, ICISPE 2020, 9-10 October 2020, Semarang, Indonesia. ( https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.9-10-2020.2304728), [Online]
  40. Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Heijden, B. I. J. M. Van Der, & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance : The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100: 67–77 (doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004),[Online]
  41. Shin, J., & Choi, Y. K. (2019). Organizational innovativeness and its determinants in South Korean nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(1): 51–68 (doi: 10.1002/nml.21359),[Online]
  42. Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 381–403 (doi: 10.5465/amr.2009.0223),[Online]
  43. Sva, P. (2021). Rewarding employee inventions in corporations remuneration and offering an optimal remuneration system. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(2): 258–289 (doi: 10.1108/EJIM-06-2019-0178),[Online]
  44. Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10): 1455–1479, [Online]
  45. Tremml, T. (2020). Barriers to entrepreneurship in public enterprises: boards contributing to inertia. Public Management Review, 00(00): 1–26 (doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1775279),[Online]
  46. Usman, M. Y., Wibowo, A. D., Laksana, W. U., Farida, U., Yusriadi, Y., & Sahid, A. (2020). Local government levy optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, August, 3083–3087
  47. Walle, S. Van De. (2018). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services. The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, 227–241
  48. Winarto, A. J. (2021). Analisis Swot Sebagai Strategi Dalam Membantu Perekonomian Umkmjasa Konveksi @Anfcreative.Iddi Era Pandemi
  49. Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2018). Pathways to workplace innovation and career satisfaction in the public service: The role of leadership and culture. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(5): 890–914. (doi: 10.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1376),[Online]
  50. Wynen. (2019). Linking turnover to organizational performance: the role of process conformance. Public Management Review Volume 21, 2019 - Issue 5
  51. Xu, F. Z., & Ying Wang. (2019). Through Customer Engagement : The Role of Customer Interactivity , Employee Affect , and Motivations. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(2): 1–26 (doi: 10.1177/1096348019893043),[Online]
  52. Yoyon Suryono, E. T. (2016). Inovasi Pendidikan Nonformal
  53. Zhu, W., Sosik, J. J., Riggio, R. E., & Yang, B. (2012). Relationships between Transformational and Active Transactional Leadership and Followers’ Organizational Identification: The Role of Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Managemen, 13(3), 186–212

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-06-20 20:58:23

No citation recorded.