DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.23.1.2024.37-63

Examining of E-readiness in the Local Government toward Smart City A Study from Balangan Regency

Maisyarah Maisyarah  -  Department of Government Studies, University Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas No.246, Babatan, Tegalgondo, Kec. Lowokwaru, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur 65144|University Muhammadiyah Malang| Indonesia, Indonesia
*Ali Roziqin orcid scopus  -  Department of Government Studies, University Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas No.246, Babatan, Tegalgondo, Kec. Lowokwaru, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur 65144|University Muhammadiyah Malang| Indonesia, Indonesia
Rossi Adi Nugroho  -  Directorate of Government Informatics Application Services, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 9, Jakarta 10110|Ministry of Communication and Information Technology|Indonesia, Indonesia
Alice Y.C Te scopus  -  The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Citation Format:
Abstract

Many local goverment in Indonesia faces challenges in implementing the Smart City program due to limited technology, infrastructure and human resources. This research aims to analyze inhibiting factors and provide suggestions for increasing government technology readiness (e-readiness) towards a Smart City. The locus of research is Balangan Regency, South Kalimantan. The research method involves interviews and observations of relevant Stakeholders. Data was collected from interviews with high-ranking government and community officials, as well as observations of infrastructure and technology services in Balangan Regency. The research results show that limited internet services, inadequate hardware and software infrastructure, limited budget, and lack of competent human resources are the main obstacles. These factors are influenced by geographic constraints, budget priorities, and lack of public awareness of the importance of technology. To overcome this, it is recommended that the government collaborate with the private sector, increase budget allocations, provide training to human resources, and carry out regular monitoring and evaluation of community readiness. In conclusion, efforts to increase government technology readiness towards a Smart city in Balangan Regency require collaboration between the government, private sector and society, as well as increased investment in infrastructure and human resources.  

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Smart City; E-readiness; Infrastructure; Technology; Balangan Regency

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Korean Popular Culture as A ‘Lethal Weapon’: A Journey Toward Nation Branding of The Republic of Korea Policy Incoherence and Reactive Approaches: Barriers to Effective Management of Land Subsidence in Semarang City, Indonesia Regional Integration and The Myanmar Crisis: Navigating The Delicate Balance Between Human Rights and Non-Interference Policy In ASEAN More recent articles
Most cited articles
ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme More cited articles
  1. Agrawal, G., Kumar, D., & Singh, M. (2022). Assessing the usability, accessibility, and mobile readiness of e-government websites: a case study in india. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(3), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00800-8
  2. Al-Osaimi, K., Alheraish, A., & Bakry, S. H. (2008). STOPE-based approach for e-readiness assessment case studies Khalid. Internation Journal of Network Management, 18(June), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem
  3. Ali, M. A. (2022). Smart city policy in developing countries: Case study of the new administrative capital in Egypt. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2774
  4. Anggraini Bonde, D. (2020). Analisis Kesiapan Kota Kotamobagu Dalam Mewujudkan Kotamobagu Sebagai Smart City. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(1), 79–92
  5. Anjani, R. D., Suprapto, & Herlambang, A. D. (2019). Evaluasi Tingkat Kesiapan Pemerintah Kota Batu Dalam Menerapkan Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (E-Government) Dengan Menggunakan ICT Readiness. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 3(4), 3123–3130
  6. Anthony Jnr, B., Abbas Petersen, S., Helfert, M., & Guo, H. (2021). Digital transformation with enterprise architecture for smarter cities: a qualitative research approach. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance , 23(4), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-04-2020-0044
  7. Bappenas. (2019). Visi Indonesia 2045 : Berdaulat, Maju, Adil, dan Makmur. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, 32, 1–158
  8. Bitjoli, B. E., Rindengan, Y. D. Y., & Karouw, S. D. S. (2017). Analisa Kesiapan Kota Cerdas (Studi Kasus: Pemerintah Kota Manado). Journal Teknik Informatika, 12(1)
  9. BPK RI. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Database Peraturan JDIH BPK RI, 212
  10. BPK RI. (2019a). Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik. 57
  11. BPK RI. (2019b). Peraturan Presiden (PERPRES) Nomor 2 Tahun 2015, Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2015 - 2019. 8(5), 55
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches. In New Delhi; SAGE Publications Iner,. Pvt. ltd. 4th ed
  13. Crumpton, C. D., Wongthanavasu, S., Kamnuansilpa, P., Draper, J., & Bialobrzeski, E. (2021). Assessing the ASEAN Smart Cities Network (ASCN) via the Quintuple Helix Innovation Framework, with Special Regard to Smart City Discourse, Civil Participation, and Environmental Performance. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2020.1827411
  14. Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005
  15. Grossi, G., Meijer, A., & Sargiacomo, M. (2020). A public management perspective on smart cities: ‘Urban auditing’ for management, governance and accountability. Public Management Review, 22(5), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1733056
  16. Gustomy, R. (2018). Menguji Sistem E-Government Kota Malang Menuju Smart City. Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(1)
  17. Herlambang, A. D., Putra, W. H. N., & Saputra, M. C. (2018). Evaluasi Kesiapan Implementasi Program Smart City Di Smart City Di Pemerintah Kabupaten Malang Dengan Menggunakan E Readiness. Tecnoscienza, 2(2), 1–19
  18. Joseph, S. (2015). Development and Validation of a Framework for e-government Readiness Measurement. Durban University of Technology, July, 1–114
  19. Julianto P, M. A., Ismanto, S. U., & Sukarno, D. (2022). E-Readiness Dinas Tenaga Kerja Kota Bandung Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Bursa Kerja Online Melalui Aplikasi BIMMA (Bandung Integrated Manpower Management Applications). JANE - Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 14(1), 266. https://doi.org/10.24198/jane.v14i1.41313
  20. Kamatula, G. (2019). An assessment of e-records readiness as a pre-requisite for e-governance in Tanzania: a case of selected public offices. University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal, 14(1), 98–115
  21. Kemenparekraf. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, 110
  22. Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Panori, A., & Tsarchopoulos, P. (2019). Smart City Planning from an Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(2), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1485368
  23. Lnenicka, M., & Saxena, S. (2021). Re-defining open government data standards for smart cities’ websites: a case study of selected cities. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance , 23(4), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-12-2020-0174
  24. Majapahit, S. A., & Hexagraha, A. (2021). Pengukuran e-Readiness Teknologi Informasi Pada Perangkat Pemerintahan Desa Panyocokan Jawa Barat Dalam Menuju Desa Berteknologi Informasi. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 3(3), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v3i3.190
  25. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
  26. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications
  27. Mutula. (2006). An evaluation of e-readiness assessment tools with respect to information access: Towards an integrated information rich tool. International Journal of Information Management, 26(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.02.004
  28. Mutula, S. M., & van Brakel, P. (2006). An evaluation of e-readiness assessment tools with respect to information access: Towards an integrated information rich tool. International Journal of Information Management, 26(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.02.004
  29. Nugroho, R. A., & Purbokusumo, Y. (2020). E-Government Readiness: Penilaian Kesiapan Aktor Utama Penerapan E-Government di Indonesia. Iptek-Kom, 22(1), 1–17
  30. Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (2012). E-Government Interoperability: Interaction of Policy, Management, and Technology Dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310392184
  31. Park, J., & Yoo, S. (2022). Evolution of the smart city: three extensions to governance, sustainability, and decent urbanisation from an ICT-based urban solution. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2110143
  32. Park, S., Choi, Y. T., & Bok, H. S. (2013). Does better e-readiness induce more use of e-government? Evidence from the Korean central e-government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 767–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501247
  33. Spicer, Z., Goodman, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2023). How ‘smart’ are smart cities? Resident attitudes towards smart city design. Cities, 141(July), 104442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104442
  34. Sugandha, Freestone, R., & Favaro, P. (2022). The social sustainability of smart cities: A conceptual framework. City, Culture and Society, 29(January 2021), 100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100460
  35. Sulistyaningsih, T., Loilatu, M. J., & Roziqin, A. (2023). Research trends on smart urban governance in Asia : a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2022-0045
  36. Tri, E., Aindita, F., Setiawan, I., & Semarang, P. K. (2022). Penerapan Konsep Smart City. 14(1), 97–116
  37. Zulfadli, M. (2019). Inovasi Pelayanan Berbasis Smart City Di Kota Makassar. 19

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-05 11:16:59

No citation recorded.