skip to main content

NAVIGATING CULTURAL AUTONOMY: A Critical Analysis of Governance in East Java Provincial Regulation Number 6 of 2024 concerning the Advancement of Regional Culture

Andrean Caspari orcid  -  Master of Public Policy, Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam, Airlangga, Kec. Gubeng, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60286 | Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
*M. Roehman Zainur Riedho orcid  -  Master of Public Policy, Universitas Airlangga, Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam, Airlangga, Kec. Gubeng, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60286 | Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Salismi Zulfi Maulidita  -  Department of Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, Chosun University, Chosundaegil 146 (Seo-seok-dong), Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61452, Republic of Korea | Chosun University, South Korea

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study critically analyzes how East Java Provincial Regulation (Perda) No. 6 of 2024 structures cultural governance, evaluating its potential for participatory, inclusive, and sustainable cultural advancement. Employing a qualitative Critical Policy Analysis (CPA) of the full official text of the Perda and related documents, the research involved Content Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis. Results demonstrate the Perda establishes a comprehensive legal and strategic framework by adopting national cultural paradigms, mandating the formation of a Regional Cultural Council (DKD), and emphasizing Regional Cultural Core Thoughts (PPKD) for strategic direction, with the Provincial Government playing a central regulatory role while normatively enshrining community participation. However, the CPA reveals that while detailed strategies are outlined, the practical realization of genuinely participatory mechanisms beyond formal councils, explicit operational coordination protocols, and precise funding allocations are largely deferred to a subsequent, all-encompassing Governor's Regulation. The study concludes that while the Perda provides a more robust and detailed foundation than initially assessable, its ultimate efficacy in fostering effective, inclusive, and sustainable cultural governance hinges critically on the substance, quality, participatory formulation, and accountable implementation of this forthcoming Governor's Regulation.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Cultural Governance; East Java; Regional Regulation; Critical Policy Analysis; Cultural Policy

Article Metrics:

  1. Bagijo, Al-Fatih, & Affan. (2024). The Duality of Administrative and Communicative Powers in Legislative Drafting: Evidence from East Java. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4533
  2. Cerisola, S., & Panzera, E. (2022). Cultural participation in Cultural and Creative Cities: Positive regional outcomes and potential congestion concerns. Papers in Regional Science, 101(6), 1245–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12709
  3. Chatikobo, M., & Green, C. (2022). Governance of Sibikwa Arts Centre: A reflection on the agility, progress, and longevity of the organisation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003253686-9
  4. Engstrom, R., & Mahmoud, J. (2024). The Eight Pillars Of American Cultural Policy. In The Routledge Handbook of Urban Cultural Planning (pp. 257–281). Seattle University Arts Leadership Program, United States: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003400592-24
  5. Haque, M. S. (2010). Decentralizing Local Governance in Thailand: Contemporary Trends and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(12–13), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.514443
  6. Hyatt, D. (2013). The Critical Higher Education Policy Discourse Analysis Framework. In International Perspectives on Higher Education Research: Vol. 9. Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (pp. 41–59). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3628(2013)0000009006
  7. Jørgensen, T. B., & and Sørensen, D.-L. (2012). Codes of Good Governance. Public Integrity, 15(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922150104
  8. Lee, C. Bin. (2015). Cultural Policy and Governance: Reviewing Policies Related to Cultural and Creative Industries Implemented by the Central Government of Taiwan Between 2002 and 2012. Review of Policy Research, 32(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12131
  9. Lehman, K., Wickham, M., & Reiser, D. (2017). Modelling the Government/Cultural Tourism Marketing Interface. Tourism Planning and Development, 14(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2016.1272483
  10. Mariyono, Annis Nur Alifatul Kamila, & Akmal Nur Alif Hidayatullah. (2025). Unity in diversity: navigating global connections through cultural exchange. Quality Education for All, 2(1), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-10-2024-0122
  11. Marx, L. (2019). Participation as policy in local cultural governance. Cultural Trends, 28(4), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1644786
  12. Marx, L. (2020). Who governs culture? Actors, federalism and expertise in Swiss regional cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1518977
  13. Muhlisin, Subroto, W. T., & Sakti, N. C. (2025). How Impact Fiscal Decentralization to Sectoral Change and Local Inequality? International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(1), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200134
  14. Pratama, Widya Noventari, & Andhika Yudha. (2019). Analisis Strategi Kebudayaan dalam Undang - Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan dalam Rangka Memperkokoh Bingkai Integrasi Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 13(1)
  15. Rick. (2024). Serap Aspirasi Seniman Jember, HPL dan DeKaJe Gelar Rembug Budaya. Sinar.CO.ID. Retrieved from https://sinar.co.id/serap-aspirasi-seniman-jember-hpl-dan-dekaje/
  16. Rohdewohld, R. (2022). Political and administrative decentralization in Asia and the Pacific. Decentralization, Local Governance, and Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia and the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003282297-2
  17. Saputra, R. (2024). Governance Frameworks and Cultural Preservation in Indonesia: Balancing Policy and Heritage. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(3), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2145
  18. Savirani, A., & and Wardhani, I. S. (2022). Local social movements and local democracy: tin and gold mining in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 30(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2022.2148553
  19. Seila, F., Selim, G., & Newisar, M. (2025). A Systematic Review of Factors Contributing to Ineffective Cultural Heritage Management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010366
  20. Sneha, & Kavitha. (2024). Exploring the economy of creativity and culture in the light of Industry 5.0: a systematic literature review of the setup of creative industries. Journal of Strategy and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-05-2023-0095
  21. Suaedi, Falih, Raharja, Wildan Taufik, & Ningrum, Ayu Puspita. (2023). The Social Embeddedness of Leadership: Unfolding the Trajectories of Individual Policy Capacity in Regional Development in East Java, Indonesia. Millennial Asia, 09763996231194741. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996231194741
  22. Tjahjanulin. (2011). Interregional cooperation policy in sound governance perspective. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 5(3), 235–241
  23. Yunita, F. T., Prasetyo, H., & Rosa, D. V. (2023). The Undefeated Defeat: Indigenous Identity Politics in the Indonesian Law on Advancement of Culture. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 7(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v7i1.39200
  24. Zhong, K., & Park, J. (2023). The double reduction policy and education development in China. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 25(3–4), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-09-2022-0063
  25. Zulkifli, & Azhari. (2018). Perlindungan Objek Pemajuan Kebudayaan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2017. Doktrina: Journal of Law, 1(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v1i1.1611

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.