DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.25.1.2026.171-186

ASEAN security analysis on transnational money laundering crimes: Formal commitments and practical implementation limitations

*Qory Fizrianti Beru Sitepu  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Mergera Akbar Sinergi Putra Agung  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Qory Fizrianti Beru Sitepu, Mergera Akbar Sinergi Putra Agung under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Money laundering is a transnational crime that directly threatens economic stability and regional security in Southeast Asia. Although ASEAN has established formal commitments and cooperative forums to enhance cross-border law enforcement, money laundering activities in the region continue to rise. This article examines how ASEAN's shared norms and collective identity influence the effectiveness of its Anti-Money Laundering (AML) governance. Drawing on the Constructivist Security Community framework, this study analyses the interplay among the ASEAN Way, technocratic institutional culture, and voluntary compliance in shaping regional AML governance. Theoretically, this article demonstrates that the Constructivist Security Community framework offers explanatory depth that prevailing interest-based approaches cannot provide, as such frameworks treat compliance as a function of institutional design rather than normative internalisation. Empirically, this article is among the first to apply Acharya's tripartite framework to AML governance in ASEAN, revealing how the ASEAN Way produces symbolic compliance as a structurally embedded outcome rather than an incidental enforcement failure. The findings indicate that non-interference and consensus-building norms, while effective at preventing political conflict, simultaneously shape the trajectory of legal and monitoring mechanism development. ASEAN’s elite-driven identity formation limits public engagement and collective accountability, producing a weak sense of ownership among member states. Regional socialisation remains largely procedural, characterised by information sharing rather than structural reform. Consequently, ASEAN’s AML efforts reflect symbolic compliance, with formal commitments coexisting alongside limited domestic transformation. This article concludes that effective AML governance requires ASEAN to evolve from consensus-based coordination toward normative and institutional integration.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: ASEAN; ASEAN Way; Constructivist Security Community; Money Laundering Norms; Regional Governance

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme More cited articles
  1. Acharya, A. (1998). Culture, security, multilateralism: The “ASEAN way” and regional order. Contemporary Security Policy, 19(1)
  2. Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge
  3. Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275
  4. Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order (2nd ed.). London: Routledge
  5. Adler, E., & Barnett, M. (1998). Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  6. ASEAN. (1999). ASEAN Plan of Action to Combat Transnational Crime. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ASEAN-Plan-of-Action-in-Combating-TC_Adopted-by-11th-AMMTC-on-20Sept17-1.pdf
  7. ASEAN. (2003). The Tenth ASEAN Regional Forum. https://asean.org/speechandstatement/chairmans-statement-the-tenth-meeting-of-asean-regional-forum/
  8. ASEAN. (2017). East Asia Summit Leaders’ Declaration on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism. https://asean.org/east-asia-summit-leaders-declaration-on-anti-money-laundering-and-countering-the-financing-of-terrorism/
  9. ASEAN. (2021). International Economic Crime, Money Laundering Overview. https://asean.org/our-communities/asean-political-security-community/peaceful-secure-and-stable-region/international-economic-crime-money-laundering/
  10. ASEAN. (2023). Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime Annual Report. https://asean.org/senior-officials-meeting-on-transnational-crime-somtc/
  11. ASEAN. (2025). ASEAN 2045: Our Shared Future. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ASEAN-2045-Our-Shared-Future.pdf
  12. ASEAN Secretariat. (2009). Assessment Report on the Implementation of the Work Programme to Combat Transnational Crime (2002–2007). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat
  13. ASEAN Secretariat. (2012). ASEAN documents on combating transnational organized crime and terrorism. ASEAN Secretariat
  14. Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG). (2023). Annual Typologies Report 2023. https://www.apgml.org/news/2023-apg-typologies-report
  15. Ba, A. D. (2009). (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Stanford University Press
  16. Ba, A. D. (2019). Understanding ASEAN’s Resilience: Norms, Identity, and Institutional Flexibility. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(3), 352–374
  17. Baker, B., & Milne, S. (2015). Dirty money states: Illicit economies and the state in Southeast Asia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(2), 151–176
  18. Basel Institute on Governance. (2023). Basel AML Index: Ranking Money Laundering Risks. https://baselgovernance.org/basel-aml-index
  19. Bassiouni, C. M. (1983). The Penal Characteristics of Conventional International Criminal Law. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 15, 27-38
  20. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press
  21. Caballero-Anthony, M. (2004). Revisioning human security in Southeast Asia. Asian Perspective
  22. Caballero-Anthony, M. (2014). Understanding ASEAN's centrality: Bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture (RSIS Working Paper No. 277). S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
  23. CNN Indonesia. (2023). Singapura Bongkar Kasus Pencucian Uang Terbesar, Sita Aset Rp43,6 T. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20231003132617-106-1006524/singapura-bongkar-kasus-pencucian-uang-terbesar-sita-aset-rp436-t
  24. Croissant, A., & Barlow, D. (2007). Following the Money: Transnational Crime and Money Laundering in East Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 15(2), 159–183
  25. Dewitt, D. (1994). Common, comprehensive, and cooperative security. The Pacific Review, 7(1)
  26. East Asia Forum. (2024). Indonesia moves to become a millionaire magnet. https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/08/27/indonesia-moves-to-become-a-millionaire-magnet/
  27. Efendi, L. S. (2018). Cross–Border law enforcement against money laundering suspects in south east asia nations (ASEAN) through “Mutual legal assistance” and its interaction to ASEAN Economic Community. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1), 1-4
  28. Emmers, Ralf. (2003). ASEAN and the securitization of transnational crime in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 16(3)
  29. Fabe, J., & Romaniuk, S. N. (2023). Norm Diffusion and Security Governance in Southeast Asia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 54(2), 301–318
  30. Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2023). Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in Southeast Asia. https://www.fatf-gafi.org
  31. Glas, A., & Martel, S. (2024). Boundary work, overlapping identities, and liminality in communities of practice: Diplomacy within and beyond ASEAN. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(1)
  32. Gibbs, C., McGarrell, E. F., & Axelrod, M. (2010). Transnational White-Collar Crime and Risk: Lessons from the Global Trade in Electronic Waste. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(3), 543-560
  33. Goh, G. (2000). The ‘ASEAN Way. Pacific Review, 13(3), 439
  34. Haacke, J. (2003). ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Development and Prospects. Routledge
  35. Hameiri, Shahar & Jones, L. (2015). Regulatory regionalism and anti-money-laundering governance in Asia. Journal of International Affairs
  36. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. (2023). The State of Southeast Asia 2023 Survey Report. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/centres/asean-studies-centre/state-of-southeast-asia-survey/the-state-of-southeast-asia-2023-survey-report-2/. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
  37. Jetschke, A., & Lenz, T. (2013). Does regionalism diffuse? A new research agenda for the study of regional organizations. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4). 626–637
  38. Jones, L. (2012). ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan
  39. Koga, K. (2022). The ASEAN Way and the changing security environment: Navigating challenges to informality and centrality. International Politics, 60(3), 521–541
  40. Kunaratnam, S. (2022). Basel AML Index 2022: Ranking money laundering and terrorist financing risks around the world. https://baselgovernance.org/publications/basel-aml-index-2022
  41. Naylor, R. T. (2002). Wages of Crime: Black Markets, Illegal Finance, and the Underworld Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
  42. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson
  43. Makmur, R. (2024). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pemberantasan Pencucian Uang di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Implementasi. Jurnal Keamanan dan Pembangunan Nasional, 12(1), 45–61
  44. Martel, S. (2022). Enacting the security community: ASEAN's never-ending story. Stanford University Press
  45. Martel, S., & Glas, A. (2023). The contested meaning-making of diplomatic norms: competence in practice in Southeast Asian multilateralism. European Journal of International Relations, 29(2), 367–391
  46. Nguyen, T. (2012). Regional Cooperation in Money Laundering Prevention: The ASEAN Perspective. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 347–359
  47. Nguyen, T. (2014). Anti–Money Laundering Policy Implementation in Vietnam: Domestic Challenges and International Pressures. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(2), 91–109
  48. Omar, N., Johari, R. J., & Othman, R. (2015). Governance and Anti–Money Laundering Compliance in ASEAN Financial Institutions. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 18(2), 183–202
  49. Pradityo, R., Sidiq, M. H. F., & Kurniawan, Y. (2021). Difusi Norma Kerja Sama Keamanan ASEAN Melawan Perdagangan Manusia. Andalas Journal of International Studies. 10(2), 151–170
  50. Rüland, Jürgen. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. The Pacific Review, 13(3)
  51. Rüland, Jürgen. (2018). The Indonesian Way: ASEAN, Europeanization, and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press
  52. Sharman, J. C. (2008). Power and Discourse in Policy Diffusion: Anti-Money Laundering in Developing States. International Studies Quarterly, 52(3). 635-656
  53. Sharman, J. C. (2011). The Money Laundry: Regulating Criminal Finance in the Global Economy. Cornell University Press
  54. Simanjuntak, E. L., Naili, Y. T., & Samekto, F. A. (2019). Free movement of judgments in cross-border money laundering crimes: legal stance toward the asean legal integration. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 12(2), 373-386
  55. Sitepu, Q.F.B. (2025). Difusi Norma Kerja Sama Pencucian Uang ASEAN. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 18(2)
  56. Stubbs, R. (2008). The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge to ‘global’ governance. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 451–468
  57. Tanner, J. (2024). Money laundering events in Singapore rose by 79% in 2023. https://asianbankingandfinance.net/co-written-partner/sponsored-articles/see-full-picture-financial-crime
  58. Tran, T. A. (2020). Financial Transparency and Anti–Money Laundering Reforms in Vietnam. Asian Economic Policy Review, 15(1), 99–117
  59. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). People for 2030: ASEAN Development and Governance Index 2022. Bangkok: UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific
  60. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2015). Cambodia, Thailand and Viet Nam target bulk cash smuggling and money laundering in the casino industry. https://www.unodc.org/roseap/en/vietnam/2015/10/money-laundering/story.html
  61. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2024). Southeast Asian countries join the global fight against money laundering. https://www.unodc.org/roseap/en/2024/09/southeast-asia-money-laundering/story.html
  62. Wong, L. (2013). Money-laundering in Southeast Asia: Liberalism and governmentality at work. Contemporary Politics, 19(2)
  63. Yuliantiningsih, A., Santoso, D., & Fadhila, R. (2023). Pencucian Uang dan Pendanaan Terorisme dalam Perspektif Kejahatan Transnasional di ASEAN. Jurnal Keamanan Global, 11(3), 212–230

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-24 20:32:00

No citation recorded.