DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.25.1.2026.144-170

Cross-country artificial intelligence policy mapping: Human-centered governance and industrial adoption prospects in Indonesia

*Dedy Permadi orcid scopus publons  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Dedy Permadi
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study analyzes Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance through a comparative study of regulatory frameworks in the United States (innovation-based), the European Union (risk-based), Spain (regulatory sandbox experimentation), and China (state-led sectoral). These four jurisdictions were selected to illustrate the operationalization of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) principles, namely reliability, safety, and trust, through different governance pathways. Current literature on AI governance predominantly focuses on the discussion of the great power rivalry, while the gap between global standards and domestic readiness of middle-power nations like Indonesia remains underexamined. As a Global South country with complex development contexts, Indonesia cannot adopt a single governance model. This study argues that Indonesia’s AI governance must transition from a risk-mitigation focus toward a hybrid approach based on readiness, incentives, and participation. A hybrid approach is more effective in integrating ethical guidelines, proportional regulation, policy experimentation, and sectoral rules in a phased manner. Integrating HCAI principles into Indonesia’s digital transformation will enable equitable AI diffusion, strengthen human oversight, and align national agenda with global norm standards. This study emphasizes the urgency of strategic policies to ensure AI adoption in Indonesia fulfills socio-economic development needs, rather than serving as mere performative policy.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; technology policy; comparative study; human-centered artificial intelligence

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme More cited articles
  1. Afdhal, M., Prawiro, R., & Fenia, S. Z. (2022). Sosialisasi Penggunaan Media Sosial Tiktok Untuk Meningkatkan Penjualan di Kampung Akrilik Padang. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dharma Andalas, 1(1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.47233/jpmda.v1i1.544
  2. Aghion, P., Antonin, C., & Bunel, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence, growth, and employment: The role of policy. Economie et Statistique, 2019(510–512), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2019.510t.1994
  3. Androniceanu, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, present and perspectives in public administration. Administrative Science and Management Public, 43, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2024.43-06
  4. Arbona, L. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Between Innovation and Legislation, Spain’s Pioneering Role. https://veridas.com/en/artificial-intelligence-regulation/
  5. Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F. A., De Arroyabe, I. F., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2024). Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technology in Society, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102733
  6. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). (2024). ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics Contents. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ASEAN-Guide-on-AI-Governance-and-Ethics_beautified_201223_v2.pdf
  7. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
  8. Bahrammirzaee, A., Ghatari, A. R., Ahmadi, P., & Madani, K. (2011). A hybrid credit ranking intelligent system using expert systems and artificial neural networks. Applied Intelligence, 34(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-009-0177-8
  9. Baker McKenzie. (2023). China: New interim measures to regulate generative AI. https://insightplus.bakermckenzie.com/bm/attachment_dw.action?attkey=FRbANEucS95NMLRN47z%2BeeOgEFCt8EGQJsWJiCH2WAWuU9AaVDeFglGa5oQkOMGl&nav=FRbANEucS95NMLRN47z%2BeeOgEFCt8EGQbuwypnpZjc4%3D&attdocparam=pB7HEsg%2FZ312Bk8OIuOIH1c%2BY4beLEAezirm3%2BK7wMU%3D&fromContentView=1
  10. BonelliErede, B., Bredin Prat, B. P., De Brauw, D. B., Hengeler Mueller, H. M., Slaughter and May, S., and M., & Uría Menéndez, U. M. (2024). G7 Competition Authorities Adopt Joint Statement on the Importance of Competition in the Digital Sector. https://www.uria.com/documentos/galerias/7389/documento/13583/issue16.pdf?id=13583
  11. Boston Consulting Group (BCG). (2024). AI Adoption in 2024: 74% of Companies Struggle to Achieve and Scale Value. https://www.bcg.com/press/24october2024-ai-adoption-in-2024-74-of-companies-struggle-to-achieve-and-scale-value
  12. Chen, H. J., Huang, S. Y., & Kuo, C. L. (2009). Using the artificial neural network to predict fraud litigation: Some empirical evidence from emerging markets. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1478–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.030
  13. Congressional Research Service. (2021). Executive Orders: An Introduction. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46738
  14. Cyberspace Administration of China. Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (2023). https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm
  15. Da Mota, M., & Scharf, S. A. Move Deliberately and Build Things: A Framework for Trustworthy Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Canadian Public Services, Canadian Public Policy Vol. 52 No. S1 (2026). University of Toronto Press. https://utppublishing.com/doi/epdf/10.3138/cpp.2025-013
  16. Dong, Z., & Miao, Y. (2022). High-tech enterprise recognition policy and enterprise performance: Also on the moderating role of high-tech zone construction. Macroeconomics, 9, 141–160
  17. Eloksari, E. A. (2020). AI to bring in $366b to Indonesia’s GDP by 2030. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/10/09/ai-to-bring-in-366b-to-indonesias-gdp-by-2030.html
  18. Eredon, B., & Westin, D. (2024). Overview of ‘The Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence’. https://www.pwc.com/jp/en/knowledge/column/generative-ai-regulation09.html
  19. Ernst, E., Merola, R., & Samaan, D. (2019). Economics of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Future of Work. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2019-0004
  20. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2018). A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai_hleg_definition_of_ai_18_december_1.pdf
  21. European Commission. (2024). Shaping Europe’s digital future: AI Act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai#:~:text=The%20AI%20Act%20(Regulation%20(EU,what%20AI%20has%20to%20offer
  22. European Commission. Annexes to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council: Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts (2021). Brussels
  23. European People’s Party Group. (2024). Empowering Entrepreneurship and SMEs: Fuelling European Prosperity. https://www.eppgroup.eu/newsroom/empowering-entrepreneurship-and-smes-fuelling-eu-prosperity#:~:text=Europe’s%20drive%20for%20economic%20prosperity,every%20corner%20of%20our%20continent
  24. European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Pub. L. No. 1689, Official Journal (OJ) of the European Union (2024). European Union. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/
  25. Executive Order No. 14110, Pub. L. No. 14110, The Executive Office of the President (2023). United States of America. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/01/2023-24283/safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence
  26. Financial Services Authority. (2018). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 13/POJK.02/2018 tentang inovasi keuangan digital di sektor jasa keuangan [Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 13/POJK.02/2018 concerning digital financial innovation in the financial services sector]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
  27. Frana, P. L. Assessing Smart Nation Singapore as an International Model for AI Responsibility, International Journal on Responsibility Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024), 1-31. James Madison University. https://doi.org/10.62365/2576-0955.1109
  28. Frank, M. R., Autor, D., Bessen, J. E., Brynjolfsson, E., Cebrian, M., Deming, D. J., … Rahwan, I. (2019, April 2). Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900949116
  29. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
  30. Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. Minds and Machines, 30(3), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-2
  31. Gasteiger, E. , & Prettner, K. (2017). On the possibility of automation-induced stagnation (7). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/155784
  32. Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2014). Industrial Policies, the Creation of a Learning Society, and Economic Development. In J. E. Stiglitz & J. Y. Lin (Eds.), The Industrial Policy Revolution I (pp. 43–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137335173_4
  33. Guadamuz, A. (2024). The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act and copyright. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 28, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12330
  34. Gyamfi, S., Gerstlberger, W., Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2024). A new perspective for European SMEs’ innovative support analysis: Does non-financial support matter? Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23796
  35. Hanggarini, P. (2025). Defense Diplomacy of Middle Powers in Digital International Relations. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), 14(1), 91-105. https://dx.doi.org/10.25077/ajis.14.1.91-105.2025
  36. Hine, E., & Floridi, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence with American values and Chinese characteristics: a comparative analysis of American and Chinese governmental AI policies. Ai & Society, 39(1), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01499-8
  37. Huang, X. (2022). Background of “machine for man” and the impact of government subsidy policy. Rev. Ind. Econ, 4, 81–101
  38. Huin, S. F., Luong, L. H. S., & Abhary, K. (2003). Knowledge-based tool for planning of enterprise resources in ASEAN SMEs. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 19(5), 409–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00033-9
  39. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Institute. (2022). Human-centered artificial intelligence (Chapter 2). In Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2022 (pp. 65–92). Stanford University. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2022-AI-Index-Report_Master.pdf
  40. Issa, H., Jabbouri, R., & Palmer, M. (2022). An artificial intelligence (AI)-readiness and adoption framework for AgriTech firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121874
  41. Jørgensen, B. N., & Ma, Z. G. (2025). Regulating AI in the energy sector: A scoping review of EU laws, challenges, and global perspectives. Energies, 18(9), 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092359
  42. Joshi, D. (2024). AI governance in India–law, policy, and political economy. Communication Research and Practice, 10(3), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2024.2346428
  43. Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2020). Steering Technological Progress
  44. Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence, Globalization, and Strategies for Economic Development (NBER Working Paper No. 28453)
  45. Kosinski, M., & Scapicchio, M. (2024). What is the Artificial Intelligence Act of the European Union (EU AI Act)? https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/eu-ai-act
  46. Kusumastuti, A., & Khoiron, A. M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. (F. Annisya & S. Sukarno,Eds.). Semarang: Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo (LPSP)
  47. Littman, M. L., Ajunwa, I., Berger, G., Boutilier, C., Currie, M., Doshi-Velez, F., Hadfield, G., Horowitz, M. C., Isbell, C., Kitano, H., Levy, K., Lyons, T., Mitchell, M., Shah, J., Sloman, S., Vallor, S., & Walsh, T. (2022). Gathering strength, gathering storms: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Report (arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.15767)
  48. Liu, G., & Liu, C. (2020). Research on the technology diffusion mechanism and the implementation strategy of the artificial intelligence technology industry. Econ. Rev. J, 9, 109–119
  49. Manyika, J. (2022). Getting AI Right: Introductory Notes on AI & Society. Daedalus, 151(2), 5–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48662023
  50. McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (Eds.). (2017). Research Methods for Law (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
  51. Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs. (2024, January 20). Siaran Pers No. 48/HM/KOMINFO/01/2024 tentang Kembangkan ekosistem, Wamenkominfo: SE tata kelola AI jadi soft regulation [Press release]. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/detail/siaran-pers-no-48-hm-kominfo-01-2024-tentang-kembangkan-ekosistem-wamenkominfo-se-tata-kelola-ai-jadi-soft-regulation
  52. Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs. (2025, June 26). Indonesia susun roadmap AI nasional, target jadi pemimpin digital Asia [Press release]. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/detail/indonesia-susun-roadmap-ai-nasional-target-jadi-pemimpin-digital-asia
  53. Ministry of Health. (2023). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor HK.01.07/MENKES/1280/2023 tentang pengembangan ekosistem inovasi digital kesehatan melalui regulatory sandbox [Minister of Health Decree Number HK.01.07/MENKES/1280/2023 concerning the development of a digital health innovation ecosystem through regulatory sandbox]. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia
  54. Mokoena, K. K. (2024). A holistic Ubuntu artificial intelligence ethics approach in South Africa. Verbum et Ecclesia, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v45i1.3100
  55. Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press
  56. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2025). Executive order on safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence. https://www.nist.gov/artificial-intelligence/executive-order-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence
  57. Nawaz, A., Ali, S. R., Bakht, N., & Noor, Z. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and the New World Order: A Comparative Study of US-China Technological Rivalry. South Asian Studies, 40(1), 23. pp. 23 – 41. https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/csas/PDF/2_40_1_25.pdf
  58. Ningsih, S. (2023). Keterkaitan Kepentingan Indonesia dalam Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Pengetahuan dan Transformasi Identitas UMKM oleh Hyperlocal Tokopedia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 19(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v19i2.5354.126-143
  59. Novelli, C., Hacker, P., Morley, J., Trondal, J., & Floridi, L. (2024). A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.57
  60. Oldemeyer, L., Jede, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2024). Investigation of artificial intelligence in SMEs: a systematic review of the state of the art and the main implementation challenges. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00405-4
  61. Omaar, H. (2024). How Innovative is China in AI? https://itif.org/publications/2024/08/26/how-innovative-is-china-in-ai/
  62. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2024). AI Principles. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html
  63. Papyshev, G., & Yarime, M. (2023). The state’s role in governing artificial intelligence: development, control, and promotion through national strategies. Policy Design and Practice, 6(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2162252
  64. Png, M.-T. (2022). At the tensions of South and North: Critical roles of Global South stakeholders in AI governance. In FAccT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1434-1445). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533200
  65. Portulans Institute. (2024). Network Readiness Index 2024. https://download.networkreadinessindex.org/reports/data/2024/nri-2024.pdf
  66. Pouget, H., & O'Shaughnessy, M. (2023). Reconciling the US Approach to AI. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/05/reconciling-the-us-approach-to-ai?lang=en
  67. Qin, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, X., & Skare, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1736–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01183-2
  68. Reinstein, R. J. (2009). The Limits of Executive Power. American University Law Review, 59(2), 259–337. http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr
  69. Ricaurte, P. (2022). Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale. Media, Culture & Society, 44(4), 726-745. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211073547
  70. Ros-Medina, J. L., Mayor-Balsas, J. M., Ferreira-Dias, T., & de Menezes-Neto, E. J. (2025). Spain and artificial intelligence: installed capacities, challenges, and opportunities. Retos, 225-240. Retrived from https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n30.2025.02
  71. Royal Decree 817/2023. (2023). Royal Decree 817/2023, of November 8, establishing a controlled testing environment for compliance testing with the proposed Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing harmonized standards on artificial intelligence. https://www-boe-es.translate.goog/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2023-22767&_x_tr_sl=es&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=sc
  72. Ruschemeier, H. (2023). AI as a challenge for legal regulation – the scope of application of the Artificial Intelligence Act proposal. ERA Forum, 23(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00725-6
  73. Şahin, O., & Karayel, D. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Business: A Systematic Review on the Threshold of Transformation. Journal of Smart Systems Research, 5(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.58769/joinssr.1597110
  74. Salari, N., Beiromvand, M., Hosseinian-Far, A., Habibi, J., Babajani, F., & Mohammadi, M. (2025). Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of the labor market: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18, 100652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100652
  75. Schmager, S., Pappas, I. O., & Vassilakopoulou, P. (2025). Understanding Human-Centred AI: a review of its defining elements and a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(15), 3771-3810. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2448719
  76. Schwartz, R., Vassilev, A., Greene, K., Perine, L., Burt, A., & Hall, P. (2022). Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence (NIST Special Publication 1270). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1270
  77. Sheehan, M. (2023). China’s AI Regulations and How They Get Made. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/07/chinas-ai-regulations-and-how-they-get-made?lang=en
  78. Sheikh, H., Prins, C., & Schrijvers, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: Definition and Background. In C. Prins & F. Brom (Eds.), Mission AI: The New System Technology (pp. 15–41). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21448-6_2
  79. Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-centered AI: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. Oxford University Press
  80. Solihati, K. D., Wati, N. K., Herawati, A. R., & Sari, N. H. (2024). Post-TikTok Shop Closure: Will MSMEs Really Rise in Indonesia? Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 23(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.23.2.2024.1-13
  81. Sutrisno, E. (2024). Indonesia Salip Vietnam dan Malaysia, Jadi Tujuan Investasi Digital Terbesar Kedua di ASEAN. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/editorial/8490/indonesia-salip-vietnam-dan-malaysia-jadi-tujuan-investasi-digital-terbesar-kedua-di-asean?lang=1
  82. Table.Briefings. (2024). Tsinghua camp: backbone of China's AI startup scene. https://table.media/en/china/sinolytics-radar/the-tsinghua-camp-the-backbone-of-chinas-ai-start-up-scene/
  83. Tanna, M., & Brown, A. (2023). AI View. https://www.simmons-simmons.com/en/publications/clptmxzfn0020u2ew5ig6152z/ai-view-28-november-2023
  84. Thomson, E. (2024). These charts show which businesses are driving the EU economy. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/01/chart-drive-eu-economy-small-business-sme/
  85. Thormundsson, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) market size worldwide from 2020 to 2030. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1474143/global-ai-market-size#:~:text=AI%20market%20size%20worldwide%20from%202020%2D2030&text=The%20market%20for%20artificial%20intelligence,billion%20U.S.%20dollars%20in%202030
  86. Timcke, S., & Schültken, T. (2023, October). Towards a more comprehensive AI ethics: How global south perspectives can enrich current approaches to AI governance. Research ICT Africa. https://researchictafrica.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/AI-ethics-in-the-global-south_Oct23.pdf
  87. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024). Readiness assessment methodology: Artificial intelligence - Indonesia. https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/indonesia
  88. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2022). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/documentViewer.xhtml?v=2.1.196&id=p::usmarcdef_0000381137&file=/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_e86c4b5d-5af9-4e15-be60-82f1a09956fd%3F_%3D381137eng.pdf&locale=en&multi=true&ark=/ark:/48223/pf0000381137/PDF/381137eng.pdf#1517_21_EN_SHS_int.indd%3A.8918%3A4
  89. Vermeulen, B., Kesselhut, J., Pyka, A., & Saviotti, P. P. (2018). The impact of automation on employment: Just the usual structural change? Sustainability, 10(5), 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051661
  90. Vijayakumar, A. (2024). AI ethics from the Global South: Addressing the social costs of artificial intelligence (Discussion Paper No. 296). Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS). https://www.ris.org.in/sites/default/files/Publication/DP-296-Anupama-Vijayakumar.pdf
  91. Vivarelli, M. (2014, March). Innovation, employment, and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of economic literature. Journal of Economic Issues. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480106
  92. von Garrel, J., & Jahn, C. (2023). Design Framework for the Implementation of AI-based (Service) Business Models for Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Enterprises. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14, 3551–3569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01003-z
  93. White & Case. (2024). AI Watch: Global Regulatory Tracker - United States https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-global-regulatory-tracker-united-states
  94. Williams, B. K. (2025). Winning the defining contest: The us-china artificial intelligence race. The Washington Quarterly, 48(2), 153-171. 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2025.2517501
  95. Wolff, J. G. (2014). Big data and the SP theory of intelligence. IEEE Access, 2, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2315297
  96. Xu, W., Dainoff, M. J., Ge, L., & Gao, Z. (2023). Transitioning to human interaction with AI systems: New challenges and opportunities for HCI professionals to enable human-centered AI. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 494-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900
  97. Yang, C. H. (2022). How Artificial Intelligence Technology Affects Productivity and Employment: Firm-level Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104536
  98. Zhang, H., & Wu, Z. (2022). How high-tech enterprise recognition affects enterprise innovation behavior: empirical evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity. Bus. Manag. J., 44, 63–81
  99. Zhang, L. (2023). China: Provisions on Deep Synthesis Technology Enter into Effect. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2023-04-25/china-provisions-on-deep-synthesis-technology-enter-into-effect/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-24 02:25:00

No citation recorded.