DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.25.1.2026.110-121

Judicial independence without public trust? Reassessing institutional legitimacy in Sierra Leone's democratic governance

*Thomas Sheku Marah orcid  -  Nusa Putra University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Thomas Sheku Marah
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines the relationship between judicial independence, public trust, and institutional legitimacy in Sierra Leone's democratic governance framework. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research analyzes constitutional provisions, governance reports, institutional assessments, and relevant scholarly literature to evaluate whether formal judicial independence is sufficient to generate institutional legitimacy. The findings indicate that judicial independence alone does not automatically translate into public confidence or institutional authority. While judicial reforms have strengthened constitutional safeguards and institutional autonomy, legitimacy remains contingent upon citizens' perceptions of judicial effectiveness, fairness, accessibility, and accountability. The study demonstrates that public trust functions as a critical mechanism linking judicial independence to democratic governance outcomes. Consequently, institutional legitimacy emerges not solely from legal protections but from the interaction between judicial autonomy and societal confidence. The article argues for a governance-centered understanding of judicial independence that incorporates public trust as a fundamental dimension of institutional legitimacy.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Judicial independence; public Trust; institutional legitimacy; democratic governance; Sierra Leone

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL More cited articles
  1. Agudo Zamora, M. (2026). Judicial independence in the Rule of Law: institutional guarantees, transparency, and public trust. Revista Española de La Transparencia, (23), 215–253. https://doi.org/10.51915/ret.440
  2. Asomah, J. Y. (2023). Does democracy fuel corruption in developing countries? Understanding Ghanaians’ perspectives. Democratization, 30(4), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2173178
  3. Awawda, O. (2024). Assessment of De Jure Judicial Independence of Constitutional Courts According to International Guidelines. Constitutional Review, 10(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1017
  4. Aydın, A. (2013). Judicial Independence across Democratic Regimes: Understanding the Varying Impact of Political Competition. Law & Society Review, 47(1), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12003
  5. Bárd, P., & Krommendijk, J. (2025). Introduction: sustaining judicial independence. In Sustaining the Rule of Law (pp. 1–35). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035345472.00005
  6. Beetham, David. (2013). The Legitimation of Power. Bloomsbury Academic
  7. Borba, L. L. O., Castagna Lunardi, F., & de Aquino Guimaraes, T. (2025). The Influence of Judges’ Managerial Competences on Judicial Performance: A Statistical Analysis. International Journal for Court Administration, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.609
  8. Bošković, M. M., & Kostić, J. (2025). Challenges of disciplinary liability of judges and public prosecutors. In Accountability of Judicial Power (pp. 86–100). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003557852-7
  9. Boston, J., Kassow, B. J., Masood, A. S., & Miller, D. R. (2023). Your Honor’s Misdeeds: The Consequences of Judicial Scandal on Specific and Diffuse Support. PS: Political Science & Politics, 56(2), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652200138X
  10. Bühlmann, M., & Kunz, R. (2011). Confidence in the Judiciary: Comparing the Independence and Legitimacy of Judicial Systems. West European Politics, 34(2), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.546576
  11. Castillo-Ortiz, P. (2020). The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions. Law and Philosophy, 39(6), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-020-09378-3
  12. Chen, P., & Savage, A. (2024). Amy Coney Barrett is Not Enough: How Descriptive and Substantive Representation Shape Trust and Legitimacy of the Federal Courts. Political Research Quarterly, 77(4), 1110–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241262340
  13. Čuroš, P. (2024). Independence and Autonomy—Means Toward Ends. In Judicial Independence in Transitional Democracies (pp. 111–129). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003458296-7
  14. Durbach, A., Reinecke, I., & Dargan, L. (2020). Enabling democracy: the role of public interest litigation in sustaining and preserving the separation of powers. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 26(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2021.1875594
  15. Fernández-Molina, E., & Grijalva-Eternod, Á. E. (2026). Expectations versus experience: What do citizens demand when dealing with criminal courts? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 26(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241257854
  16. Friedman, R. (2015). Restorative Justice in Sierra Leone: Promises and Limitations. In Evaluating Transitional Justice (pp. 55–76). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468222_4
  17. Graybill, L. S. (2011). Partial Justice and Reconciliation for Sierra Leone Women but Reparations and Reform Remain Elusive. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2011)0000032008
  18. Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2019). The long-term relationship between de jure and de facto judicial independence. Economics Letters, 183, 108603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108603
  19. Jackson, P. (2015). Whose Justice in Sierra Leone? Power, Security and Justice in Post-Conflict Reconstruction. In Evaluating Transitional Justice (pp. 197–215). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468222_10
  20. Jalloh, M. J. (2008). Sierra Leone: Beyond Change & Continuity. Review of African Political Economy, 35(116). https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240802196955
  21. Kelsall, T. (2009). Culture under Cross-Examination. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642173
  22. Knowles, P. (2006). The Power to Prosecute: The Special Court for Sierra Leone from a Defence Perspective. International Criminal Law Review, 6(3), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181206778553860
  23. Mahony, C. (2015). A Political Tool? The Politics of Case Selection at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. In Evaluating Transitional Justice (pp. 77–100). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468222_5
  24. Marah. (2026a). Judicial independence and the effectiveness of constitutional complaint systems. Constitutional Review, 12(1), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1212
  25. Marah. (2026b). Sierra Leone’s Constitutional Framework for Resource Governance and Economic Inequality: A Socio-Legal Study. Constitutional Law Review, 5(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal.iain-bone.ac.id/index.php/colrev/article/view/5996
  26. Marah, T. S. (2025). The international criminal justice mechanisms. Journal of Governance and Public Administration, 2(2), 530–541. https://doi.org/10.70248/jogapa.v2i2.1723
  27. Marah, T. S. (2026c). Judicial Reform and Human Security in West Africa: Comparative Lessons from Ghana and Sierra Leone. Gloria Justitia, 6(1), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.25170/GLORIAJUSTITIA.V6I1.7907
  28. Augustine Sorie-Sengbe. (2024). The Protector Becomes the Predator: The Perception of Judicial Corruption and Demand for Judicial Accountability in Sierra Leone. In The Diverse Facets of Corruption in Sierra Leone (pp. 161–178). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52958-0_9
  29. Miyandazi, V., & Okubasu, D. M. (2025). Judiciary chiefs in hybrid regimes: Kenya. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 23(1), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaf016
  30. Mphepo, T. (2014). The Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone. Rationale and Challenges. International Criminal Law Review, 14(1), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01402006
  31. Paczolay, P. (2019). The Notion of Judicial Independence: Impartiality and Effectiveness of Judges. In Judicial Power in a Globalized World (pp. 331–343). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20744-1_22
  32. Rodman, K. A. (2015). Intervention and the ‘Justice Cascade’: Lessons from the Special Court for Sierra Leone on Prosecution and Civil War. Human Rights Review, 16(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-014-0324-4
  33. Sesay, M. (2015). Harmonizing Customary Justice with the International Rule of Law? Lessons from Post-Conflict Sierra Leone. In Evaluating Transitional Justice (pp. 173–195). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468222_9
  34. Sulastri, D., Arifin, F., Susanto, A. F., Huda, U. N., & Md. Nor, M. Z. (2025). Institutional Integrity and Challenges in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Institution. Jurnal Media Hukum, 32(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v32i1.24100
  35. Thompson, M. R., & Batalla, E. V. C. (Eds.). (2018). Routledge handbook of the contemporary Philippines. New York: Routledge, 2018.: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709215
  36. Toader, T., & Safta, M. (2025). Enhancing Transparency of the Constitutional Courts—The Role of the New Technologies. In Rule of Law, Technology and Environment (pp. 61–72). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76349-6_5
  37. Tyler, T. R. (2021). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press
  38. Weber, M., Roth, G., Wittich, C., & Fischoff, E. (1978). Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-11-14 11:29:19

No citation recorded.