DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.8.2.1-12

KOMODIFIKASI PEKERJA PADA YOUTUBER PEMULA DAN UNDERRATED (Studi Kasus YouTube Indonesia)

*Himmatul Ulya  -  Program Studi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIP, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 3 Jul 2019; Published: 11 Dec 2019.
Open Access Copyright 2019 Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to reveal commodification form and process which experienced by beginner and underrated YouTuber in Indonesia. This research uses a critical paradigm with qualitative approach through observation and indepth interview by developing political economy communication through especially commodification of labor as a theoritical framework. The development of new media especially YouTube, became on of the attractions for the community to plunge as creative workers in the digital world. YouTuber also known as content creator is profession that is in great demand by the millenial generation it can upload content video that can provide commercial benefits and popularity. The monetization and copyright feature on the YouTube platform was not able to be obtained by all creators. This research shows the commodification process that is not realized by creators, especially beginner and underrated YouTuber through the YouTube partnership programs (YPP). The commodification form experienced by creators is the exploitation of content ownership and digital labor. Hence, creators and YouTubers accept the exploitation as a fair demand because of process alienation, mystification, reification and naturalization.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: commodification of labor; YouTube; alienation; mystification; reification; naturalization

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
LITERASI DIGITAL DAN ETIKA MEDIA SOSIAL DI ERA POST-TRUTH KOMODIFIKASI PEKERJA PADA YOUTUBER PEMULA DAN UNDERRATED (Studi Kasus YouTube Indonesia) FANATISME PENGGEMAR KPOP DALAM BERMEDIA SOSIAL DI INSTAGRAM More recent articles
Most cited articles
Peranan Komunikasi Interpersonal Antara Guru Bimbingan Konseling (BK) dengan Siswa dalam Menangani Kenakalan Siswa (Studi Kasus di SMP Kristen 2 Salatiga) SOCIAL STRATEGY PADA MEDIA SOSIAL UNTUK PROMOSI PARIWISATA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Stigmatisasi Pemberitaan Terorisme di Media Massa Faktor-faktor Penting Daya Tarik Stasiun Radio Bagi Pendengar Radio Di Kota Semarang FENOMENA PHUBBING DI ERA MILENIA (Ketergantungan Seseorang pada Smartphone terhadap Lingkungannya) More cited articles
  1. Andrejevic, M. (2009). Exploiting Youtube: Contradictions of User-Generated Labor. In P. &. Snickar, Youtube Reader (pp. 406-423). Stockholm: National Library of Sweden
  2. Endah P, C. (2011). Memahami Studi Kasus sebagai Metode Penelitian. In A. &. Ishak, Mix Methodology Dalam Penelitian Komunikasi ASPIKOM (pp. 199232). Yogyakarta: Mata Padi Pressindo
  3. Fuchs, C. & Dyer-W, N. (2012). Karl Marx @ Internet
  4. Studies. New Media & Society Sage Publication, 1-16
  5. Fuchs, C. &. Sevignani, S (2013). What is Digital Labour? What is Digital Work? What’s their Difference? And Why do theese questions matter for understanding social media?, . tricple C : Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 273-293
  6. Hecto, P. (2014). The socio-tehnical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money . New Media & Society Sage Publication, 1-17
  7. Herdiansyah, H. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
  8. Kriyantono, R. (2006). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
  9. Labas, N. Y. & Yasmine, I. (2017). Komodifikasi di Era Masyarakat Jejaring: Studi Kasus Youtube Indonesia. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Volume 4 No.2 UGM, 104-119
  10. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
  11. Moeleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif . Bandung, Indonesia: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  12. Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication Second Edition. London: Sage Publication Ltd
  13. Muzairi. (2014). Fetisisme Komoditi dan Mistifikasi dalam Iklan. Refleksi UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 194-203
  14. Praditya, D. (2019, 5 20). TECHINASIA. Retrieved from TECHINASIA: https://id.techinasia.com/faktaperkembangan-youtube-di-indonesia
  15. Pratopo M, W. (2017). Komodifikasi Wartawan di Era Konvergensi: Studi Kasus Tempo. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 129-138
  16. Subandi, E. Z. & Sadono, P. T. (2018). Komodifikasi, Spasialisasi dan Strukturalisasi dalam Media Baru di Indonesia. National Conference of Creative Industry (pp. 822-842). Jakarta: Universitas Bunda Mulia
  17. Sunarto. (2011). Paradigma dan Metode Penelitian Komunikasi di Indonesia. In A. &. Ishak, Mix Methodology Dalam Penelitian Komunikasi ASPIKOM (pp. 326). Yogyakarta: Mata Padi Pressindo
  18. Suseno-Magnis, F. (1999). Pemikiran Karl Marx. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  19. Wasko, J. &. Erickson, M. (2009). The Political Economy of Youtube, Youtube Reader. In P. &. Snickars, Youtube Reader (pp. 282-283). Stockholm: National Library of Sweden
  20. YouTube. (2019, May 15). YouTube . Retrieved from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/intl/id/creators/ partner-managers/

Last update:

  1. KOMODIFIKASI SIARAN OLAHRAGA DI TELEVISI PUBLIK: STUDI KASUS LIGA PRIMER INGGRIS DI LPP TVRI

    Dhyayi Warapsari, Lintang Ratri Rahmiaji, Ade Armando. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10 (2), 2021. doi: 10.14710/interaksi.10.2.93-103

  2. YouTube content commodification: a critical discourse analysis on Deddy Corbuzier’s channel

    Endah Saftarina Khairiyani. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 6 (1), 2022. doi: 10.25139/jsk.v6i1.4335

Last update: 2025-06-30 02:26:07

No citation recorded.