DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.10.1.1-11

PESAN KESETARAAN PENYANDANG DISABILITAS MELALUI INTERAKSI SIMBOLIK MEDIA SOSIAL

*Rizki Saga Putra  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Yuni Novianti Marin Marpaung  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Yudha Pradhana  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Ramelan Rimbananto  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2021 Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Being considered equal to normal people in general is a dream that people with disa-bilities really want to realize. The public's view of disability has constructed the stig-ma that people with disabilities are unable to move like normal people specifically relating to physical exercise.. The difficulty of dismantling the stigma that is already inherent and generalizing persons with disabilities with physical disability or mal-function becomes a particular challenge faced by persons with disabilities as a mi-nority group. This paper uses the constructivist paradigm as a point of view in look-ing at understanding the complexity of social construction. The phenomenological method used in this study will explore the perspective of individuals with disabilities through self-concept "me" as an object that is the result of community construction, try to be replaced with "I" as a subject that is reconstructed through the help of so-cial media with self-actualization amid physical limitations which is owned. This study found that messages through social media that contain hopes and big dreams which imply that people with disabilities also have physical abilities and expertise equivalent to normal people in general. Various attempts were made, even more so by utilizing social media as a means of proving to the world about "This Is Me"and “I Can Do Anything

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Transcripts
Transkrip Wawancara
Subject
Type Transcripts
  Download (176KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Disability; Stigma; Symbolic Iteraction; New Media; Social Media;

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
STEREOTIP TENTANG DIFABEL: SEBUAH PERSPEKTIF KOMUNIKASI LINTAS BUDAYA PRODUKSI CITRA POLISI DALAM FILM : SEBUAH UPAYA SAKRALISASI (Analisis Genre Pemenang Police Movie Festival 2017-2019) ANTARA KUASA KEBOHONGAN DAN KEBEBASAN BEROPINI WARGA: ANALISIS WACANA FOUCAULDIAN PADA HOAKS PANDEMI CORONA DI INDONESIA More recent articles
Most cited articles
Komunikasi Orangtua-Anak dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Pendidikan SOCIAL STRATEGY PADA MEDIA SOSIAL UNTUK PROMOSI PARIWISATA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Faktor-faktor Penting Daya Tarik Stasiun Radio Bagi Pendengar Radio Di Kota Semarang Peranan Komunikasi Interpersonal Antara Guru Bimbingan Konseling (BK) dengan Siswa dalam Menangani Kenakalan Siswa (Studi Kasus di SMP Kristen 2 Salatiga) TINGKAT KETERGANTUNGAN PENGGUNA MEDIA SOSIAL DAN KECEMASAN SOSIAL More cited articles
  1. Bernadeta, L. S. (2017). Aktualisasi Diri Generasi Y di Instagram. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(1), 93-109
  2. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. Coleman-Fountain, E., & McLaughlin, J. (2013). The interactions of disability and impairment. Social Theory & Health, 11(2), 133-150
  4. Eccles, S., Hutchings, M., Hunt, C., & Heaslip, V. (2018). Risk and stigma: students' perceptions and disclosure of'disability'in higher educa-tion. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 20(4), 191-208
  5. Effendy, O. U. (1989). Kamus Komunikasi. Bandung: Mandar Maju
  6. Ellis-Hill, C., Payne, S., & Ward, C. (2008). Using stroke to explore the life thread model: an alter-native approach to understanding rehabilitation following an acquired disability. Disability and rehabilitation, 30(2), 150-159
  7. Fisher, B. A. (1986). Teori-teori komunikasi: perspektif mekanistis, psikologis, interaksional, dan prag-matis B. Aubrey Fisher; penerjemah Soejono. Remadja Karya, Bandung
  8. Gallagher, S. (2012). What Is Phenomenology?. In Phenomenology (pp. 7-18). Palgrave Macmil-lan, London
  9. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford university press
  10. Goffman, E. (1990). Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin Books Ltd
  11. Gulley, S. P., Rasch, E. K., Altman, B. M., Bethell, C. D., Carle, A. C., Druss, B. G., ... & Chan, L. (2018). Introducing the Adults with Chronic Healthcare Needs (ACHCN) definition and screening instrument: Rationale, supporting evidence and testing. Disability and health jour-nal, 11(2), 204-213
  12. Howley, K. (Ed.). (2009). Understanding Community Media: SAGE Publications. SAGE publications
  13. Karuniasih, N., Nugroho, W., & Kamajaya, G. (2017). Tinjauan Fenomenologi Atas Stigmatisasi Sosial Penyandang Disabilitas Tunarungu. Jurnal Ilmi-ah Sosiologi (Sorot) diambil dari https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/sorot/article/view/26174
  14. Lemert, E.M. (1970) Sociological perspective. In: J.G. Sheehan (ed.) Stuttering: Research and Therapy. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 170–187
  15. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (2013). The Constructiv-ist Credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc
  16. Lipsitz, G. (2006). The possessive investment in white-ness: How white people profit from identity poli-tics. Temple University Press
  17. Maris, S. (2019). Dibantu Pemda, Kemensos Perkuat Hak Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Lipu-tan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4115986/dibantu-pemda-kemensos-perkuat-hak-bagi-penyandang-disabilitas
  18. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society (Vol. 111). University of Chicago Press.: Chicago
  19. Morin, R. T., Nelson, C., Bickford, D., Insel, P. S., & Mackin, R. S. (2019)
  20. Somatic and anxiety symptoms of depression are associated with disability in late life depression. Aging & mental health, 1-4
  21. Nastiti, A. D. (2017). Identitas Kelompok Disabilitas dalam Media Komunitas Online: Studi Mengenai Pembentukan Pesan Identitas Disabil-itas dalam Kartunet. com. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 31-42
  22. Obar, J.A. and Wildman, S. (2015). Social media defi-nition and the governance challenge: An intro-duction to the special issue. Telecommunica-tions policy, 39(9), 745-750
  23. Puntoadi, D. (2011). Menciptakan Penjualan Melalui Social Media. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Kompu-tindo
  24. Rothman, J. (2018). Social work practice across disa-bility. Routledge
  25. Roziqi, M. (2018). Perlawanan Siswa Disabilitas Korban Perundungan: Sebuah Studi Fenome-nologi. Jurnal Psikoedukasi dan Konseling, 2 (2)
  26. Scully, J.L. (2010) Hidden labor: Disabled/nondisabled encounters, agency and autonomy. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3(2): 25–42
  27. Smith MB. (2005). Personality and social psychology: retrospections and aspirations. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 9:334–40
  28. Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annu. Rev. Soci-ol, 34, 15-31
  29. Stryker S. (1997). In the beginning there is society: les-sons from a sociological social psychology. In The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society, ed. C McGarty, SA Haslam, pp. 315–27. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
  30. Temple, J. B., Kelaher, M., & Williams, R. (2018). Discrimination and avoidance due to disability in Australia: evidence from a National Cross Sectional Survey. BMC Public Health, 18, 1347
  31. Titchkosky, T. (2000). Disability studies: The old and the new. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 197-224

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-22 09:59:30

No citation recorded.