skip to main content

Empowered Vulnerable Groups: How Digital Media Portrays The Vulnerable Group In Indonesia Within Its Content

Nindita Asrining Tisna  -  Department of Digital public Relations, School of Communication and Social Sciences, Telkom University, Indonesia
*Sarah Derma Ekaputri orcid  -  Department of Digital public Relations, School of Communication and Social Sciences, Telkom University, Indonesia
Received: 16 Jun 2025; Published: 30 Jun 2026.
Editor(s): Nurul Hasfi, Pawito Pawito, Billy Sarwono, Hapsari Sulistyani
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Nindita Asrining Tisna, Sarah Derma Ekaputri
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study aims to analyze how the digital media outlet Narasi Newsroom, through its People segment, constructs the image of vulnerable groups within the context of social life. Vulnerable groups in this research include women, the elderly, indigenous communities, the poor, and communities with diverse social identities. This study employs a qualitative content analysis with a descriptive approach, using Peter L. Berger's theory of the social construction of reality as the analytical framework. The results show that Narasi Newsroom presents vulnerable groups as individuals and communities with roles, values, and sociocultural strengths worthy of recognition. Through the use of symbols, narratives, and depictions of daily activities, these groups are portrayed not merely as victims, but as active members of society with social roles. The media thus facilitates a social construction process that encourages a more positive public perception of vulnerable communities. This research recommends the importance of a journalistic approach that involves the subjects directly in the media coverage, so that vulnerable groups are given space to express their identities and life values in a complete and dignified manner.
Keywords: Digital Media; Social Construction; Vulnerable Groups; Narasi Newsroom; Qualitative Content Analysis

Article Metrics:

  1. Bungin, B. (2006). Sosiologi Komunikasi (Teori, Paradigma, Dan Diskursus Teknologi Komunikasi Di Masyarakat
  2. Ilham, T., Dewanti, M., Navy, T., & Sudarso, I. R. (2022). Menakar Afirmasi Media Terhadap Kelompok Marginal: Analisis Pemberitaan Masyarakat Adat Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 20(1), 1–16. Https://Doi.Org/10.54783/Dialektika.V20i1.28
  3. Firmansyah, D. (2020). Konvergensi Media Grup EMTEK dalam Pemberitaan Disabilitas. 4(1), 61–72
  4. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2002). A Model of ( Often Mixed ) Stereotype Content : Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Perceived Status and Competition. 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
  5. Humaedi, S., Wibowo, B., & Raharjo, S. T. (2020). KELOMPOK RENTAN DAN KEBUTUHANNYA ( Sebuah Kajian Hasil Pemetaan Sosial CSR PT Indonesia Power UPJP Kamojang ). 0042, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v10i1.26896
  6. Kuckartz, U. (2023). Qualitative Content Analysis
  7. Limantė, A., & Теrеškinas, A. (2022). Definition of Vulnerable Groups BT - Legal Protection of Vulnerable Groups in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland: Trends and Perspectives (A. Limantė & D. Pūraitė-Andrikienė (eds.); pp. 3–27). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06998-7_1
  8. Mechanic, D., & Tanner, J. (2007). Downloaded from content.healthaffairs.org by Health Affairs on June 27, 2014 at BIBLIOTHEQUE DE L UNIVERSITE. 5(5), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1220
  9. Noble-carr, D., & Woodman, E. (2018). Considering Identity and Meaning Constructions for Vulnerable Young People. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558416684952
  10. Pandir, M. (2020). Media Portrayals of Refugees and their Effects on Social Conflict and Social Cohesion. Perceptions, 25(1), 99–120
  11. Parahita, G., & Nurhadi. (2024). Excluding the margins: Indonesian media’s framing of women and people with disability in the COVID-19 pandemic reporting. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 13(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00084_1
  12. Poell, Thomas, & Borra, Erik. (2012). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431533
  13. Ramasubramanian, S. (2011). The Impact of Stereotypical Versus Counterstereotypical Media Exemplars on Racial Attitudes , Causal Attributions , and Support for Affirmative Action. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384854
  14. Sajjapong, T., Darmawan, D., & Marsal, A. P. (2022). The Role of Social Stereotypes in Shaping Opportunities and Inequalities in Society : Their Impact on Education , Employment , and Intergroup Interactions. 1(1), 44–49
  15. Solihah, A. M., & Candrasari, Y. (2023). Wacana Perempuan Dalam Teks Berita Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Anak di Portal Berita Grid.Id Periode Agustus 2020. Da’watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting, 4(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.47467/dawatuna.v4i1.3269
  16. Stuart Hall. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices
  17. Thanawat Sajjapong, Didit Darmawan, A. P. M. (2022). The Role of Social Stereotypes in Shaping Opportunities and Inequalities in Society : Their Impact on Education , Employment , and Intergroup Interactions. 1(1), 44–49
  18. Zarowsky, C., Haddad, S., & Nguyen, V. (2013). Introduction Beyond ‘ vulnerable groups ’: contexts and dynamics of vulnerability. 20, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975912470062

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-01 09:18:08

No citation recorded.