DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jgi.7.1.63-68

Perilaku sarapan pagi kaitannya dengan status gizi dan anemia pada anak sekolah dasar

*Lalu Juntra Utama  -  Jurusan Gizi, Poltekkes Kemenkes Kupang, Indonesia
Anita Ch Sembiring  -  Jurusan Gizi, Poltekkes Kemenkes Kupang, Indonesia
Juni Gressilda L Sine  -  Jurusan Gizi, Poltekkes Kemenkes Kupang, Indonesia
Received: 18 Oct 2018; Published: 30 Dec 2018.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background : The children are a nation's investment, because they are the next generation of the nation. The quality of the nation in the future is determined by the quality of children today. Indonesia and other developing countries in general are still dominated by four major nutritional problems
Objective : This research aimed to analyze prevalence of anemia, breakfast habits, nutritional status in school children and compare two childhood education centers located in public and private school in Kupang City, East Nusa Tenggara
Methods : This research used 645 were included in this cross sectional study and was done in March until May 2017. The subjects were fourth, fifth and sixth grade of elementary of public school (SD bertingkat Kelapa Lima 1, SD Inpres Bakunase) and private school (SD Asumta, SD GMIT Naioni, SDI Maulafa dan SDK Don Bosco 3). Breakfast habits data were collected by filling questionnaire; nutritional status was estimated by BMI/Age , Height/Age which weight and height of subjects were measured directly; and anemia status was estimated by hemoglobin test/hemocue. The frequency of breakfast is determined based on always breakfast and no breakfast and the sample usually consume breakfast before 7 am.
Result : Compare two childhood education centre was Significant differences between public and private schools were found in nutritional status variables with height for age indicators and on breakfast habits. The prevalence of anemia in elementary school children in Kupang by 27% which is measured by blood hemoglobin levels. Contribution of great family, gender and age in students were higher with regular breakfast. The difference in the variable nutritional status with height for age indicator with a value of p = 0.034 and breakfast habits with a value of p = 0.002
Conclusion : The differences in breakfast habits in public and private elementary school children are thought by the role of teachers in schools and breakfast habits can help improve nutritional status and blood hemoglobin levels

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: breakfast habit; hemoglobin status; nutritional status

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Perilaku sarapan pagi kaitannya dengan status gizi dan anemia pada anak sekolah dasar Lingkar lengan atas dan panjang ulna sebagai parameter antropometri untuk memperkirakan berat badan dan tinggi badan orang dewasa Kadar seng dan kadar malondialdehyde pada penderita multi drug resistant tuberculosis dan tuberkulosis sensitif More recent articles
  1. Best C, Neufingerl N, Van GL. The nutritional status of school-aged children: why should we care? Food Nutr Bull. 31: 400-417. 2010
  2. Almatsier S. Prinsip Dasar Ilmu Gizi. Jakarta (ID): PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 2010
  3. Ikalor A. Pertumbuhan dan perkembangan. Jurnal Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan 7(1):1-6. 2013
  4. Heryanti, L. Kegemukan, anemia, prestasi belajar siswa sekolah dasar di Kota Bogor. [Skripsi]. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor. 2014
  5. Hadi, Hamam. Beban ganda masalah gizi dan implikasinya terhadap kebijakan pembangunan kesehatan nasional. Rapat Terbuka Majelis Guru Besar; 2005 Feb 5; Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Yogyakarta (ID): Universitas Gadjah Mada. 2005
  6. Hardinsyah, Perdana F. Analisis jenis, jumlah, dan mutu gizi konsumsi sarapan anak Indonesia. J Gizi Pangan. 8(1):39-46. 2013
  7. Kleinman RE, Hall S, Green H, Korzec-Ramirez D, Patton K, Pagano ME, Murphy JM. Diet, breakfast, and academic performance in children. Ann Nutr Metab. 46(01): 24–30. 2002
  8. Martin A, Normand S, Sothier M, Peyrat J, Louche-Pelissier C, Laville M. Is advice for breakfast consumption justified? Results from a short-term dietary and metabolic experiment in young healthy men. Br J Nutr. 84:337– 344. 2000
  9. KEMENKES RI] Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Jakarta (ID): Badan Litbangkes Kemenkes RI. 2013
  10. Utama, L. J. Analisis Faktor Risiko Konsumsi Pangan Hewani Pada Wanita Dewasa Di Indonesia. CHMK HEALTH JOURNAL, 2(2), 43-43. 2018
  11. Gibson SA, Gunn P. What’s for breakfast? Nutritional implications of breakfast habits: insights from the NDNS dietary records. Nutrition Bulletin. 36. 78-86. doi: 10.1111/j1467-3010.2010.01873.x.2011
  12. Supariasa IDN, Bakri B, Fajar I. Penilaian Status Gizi Edisi Revisi. Jakarta (ID): Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC. 2012
  13. Adiana PPE, Karmini NL. Pengaruh pendapatan, jumlah anggota keluarga, dan pendidikan terhadap pola konsumsi rumah tangga miskin di Kecamatan Gianyar. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Univ Udayana. 1(1): 1-60. 2012
  14. Fila SA dan Smith C. Applying the theory of planned behavior to healthy eating behaviors in urban native American youth. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 3:11–22. 2006
  15. Pereira MA, Erickson E, McKee P, Schrankler K, Raatz SK, Lytle LA, Pellegrini AD. Breakfast frequency and quality may affect glycemia and appetite in adults and children. J Nutr. 141: 163S–168S. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.114405.2011
  16. Kleinman RE, Hall S, Green H, Korzec-Ramirez D, Patton K, Pagano ME, Murphy JM. Diet, breakfast, and academic performance in children. Ann Nutr Metab. 46(01): 24 –30. 2002
  17. Millimet DL, Tchernis R, Husain M. School nutrition programs and the incidence of childhood obesity. Journal of Human Resources. 45(3): 640- 654. 2010
  18. Madanijah, S. Pendidikan gizi. Dalam Baliwati, YF., Khomsan, A., Dwiriani, CM. Pengantar Pangan dan Gizi. Penebar Swadaya: Jakarta. 2004
  19. Chowdhury F, Chisti MJ, Hossain MI, Malek MA, et al. Association between paternal smoking and nutritional status of under-five children attending Diarrheal Hospital, Dhaka Bangladesh. Acta pediatri 2011 Mar;100(3):390-5
  20. Gibson SA, Gunn P. 2011. What’s for breakfast? Nutritional implications of breakfast habits: insights from the NDNS dietary records. Nutrition Bulletin. 36. 78-86. doi: 10.1111/j1467-3010.2010.01873.x.
  21. Gibson RS. 2005. Principles of Nutritional Assessment: Second Edition. New York (US): Oxford University Press
  22. Rampersaud GC, Pereira MA, Girard BL, Adams J, Metzl JD. Breakfast habits, nutritional status, body weight, and academic performance in children. Journal of The American Dietetic Association. 105: 743-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.007.2005
  23. Hardinsyah, Aries M. Jenis pangan sarapan dan perannya dalam asupan gizi harian anak usia 6-12 tahun di Indonesia. Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan. 7 (2): 89-96. 2012
  24. Ruxton & Kirk. Breakfast: a review of associations with measures of dietary intake, physiology and biochemistry. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.Aug;78(2):199-213. 1997
  25. Jackson J, Williams R, McEvoy M, MacDOnald-Wicks L, Patterson A. Is higher consumption of animal flesh foods associated with better iron status among adults in develop countries? A systematic review. Nutrients. 8(89): 1-27. doi: 10.3390/nu8020089.2016
  26. Escott-Stump S, Mahan LK. Krause’s Food & Nutrition Theraphy: 12th Edition. Philadelphia (US): Elsevier Inc. 2008
  27. Hurrell R, Egli I. Iron bioavailability and dietary reference values. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 91(suppl): 1461-1467. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28674F.2010

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.