skip to main content


*Chaterine Alvina Prima Hapsari orcid  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Purnawan Adi Wicaksono  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Wiwik Budiawan  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Diana Puspita Sari  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Atheea Annisa Rahma  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Dominico Laksma Paramestha  -  Yuan Ze University; Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:

The furniture industry is a non-oil and gas sector that can be developed aggressively due to the abundant natural resources provided by Indonesia's forests. However, there are several issues in the wooden furniture industry, starting on the upstream supply chain, especially in the raw material procurement process. The increasing product cost because of high procurement costs could make this industry hard to compete or grow. Thus, this study proposes an improvement of raw material procurement by developing a collaborative model to minimize the total circular procurement cost in the wooden furniture industry supply chain. Adopting the collaborative model is expected to reduce the raw material procurement costs of all parties involved in the supply chain by shortening the supply chain. In addition, this study built a dynamic system model with an implementation circular supply chain concept, which focuses on regenerating the wood raw material toward zero waste. The finding is that a collaborative model could reduce the total circular procurement cost by 25% to 35% compared to the base model. A recommendation for building the terminal comes from the collaborative model. The result of this study provides a solution to elevate the furniture industry's competitiveness through cost reduction.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: circular economy; circular procurement cost; collaborative procurement; furniture industry; supply chain

Article Metrics:

  1. Braulio-Gonzalo, M., & Bovea, M. D. (2020). Criteria analysis of green public procurement in the Spanish furniture sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258.
  2. Coloma-Jiménez, M., Akizu-Gardoki, O., & Lizundia, E. (2022). Beyond ecodesign, internationalized markets enhance the global warming potential in the wood furniture sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(2), 134795.
  3. Damayanti, R., Ozarska, B., Pandit, I. K. N., Febrianto, F., & Pari, G. (2018). Wood Properties of 5-year-old Fast Grown Teak. Wood Research, 9(2), 29-34
  4. Dihni, V. A. (2022). Berapa Luas Lahan Berhutan Indonesia pada 2020?
  5. Do, T. T. H., Ly, T. B. T., Hoang, N. T., & Tran, V. T. (2023). A new integrated circular economy index and a combined method for optimization of wood production chain considering carbon neutrality. Chemosphere, 311(2), 137029.
  6. Effendi, R. (2011). Kajian Tata Niaga Kayu Rakyat di Pulau Jawa bagian Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman, 8(4), 251-258.
  7. MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy, economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 21-34
  8. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019, February). Circular economy systems diagram.
  9. Hald, K. S., Wiik, S., & Larssen, A. (2021). Sustainable procurement initiatives and their risk-related costs: A framework and a case study application. Measuring Business Excellence, 25(2), 230-243
  10. Kemenperin, P. (2022). Buku Analisis Pembangunan Industri 2022: Peran Strategis dan Potensi Penguatan Industri Furnitur Terhadap Perekonomian Nasional.
  11. Lee, S. H., Lum, W. C., Boon, J. G., Kristak, L., Antov, P., Pe˛dzik, M., Rogozinski, T., Taghiyari, H. R., Lubis, M. A. R., Fatriasari, W., Yadav, S. M., Chotikhun, A., & Pizzi, A. (2022). Particleboard from agricultural biomass and recycled wood waste: A review. Journal of Material Research and Technology, 20, 4630–4658.
  12. Ministry of Trade of The Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Handbook of Commodity Profile “Indonesian Furniture: Creativity in Woods.” Trade Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Trade, Republic of Indonesia
  13. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2016). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management (Sixth). Cengage Learning
  14. Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC). (n.d.). Furniture. Retrieved November 30, 2022, from
  15. Öner, N., & Kuyzu, G. (2021). Core stable coalition selection in collaborative truckload transportation procurement. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 154, 102447
  16. PERMAPSI. (n.d.). Profile PERMAPSI. Retrieved December 2, 2022, from
  18. Pinheiro, M. A. P., Jugend, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. de S., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Latan, H. (2022). Circular economy-based new products and company performance: The role of stakeholders and Industry 4.0 technologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31, 483–499
  19. Sachan, A., Sahay, B. S., & Sharma, D. (2005). Developing Indian grain supply chain cost model: A system dynamics approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(3), 187–205.
  20. Salim, Z., & Munadi, E. (2017). Info Komoditi Furnitur. Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia
  21. Simoes, A., & Hidalgo, C. (2011). The Economic Complexity Observatory: An Analytical Tool for Understanding the Dynamics of Economic Development. Scalable Integration of Analytics and Visualization. Workshops at the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  22. Sofuoğlu, S. D., & Kurtoğlu, A. (2012). A Survey for Determination of Wastage Rates at Massive Wood Materials Processing. Wood Research, 57(2), 297–308
  23. UNEP. (2021). Sustainable Public Procurement: How to Wake the Sleeping Giant! Introducing the United Nations Environment Programme’s Approach. UNESCO
  24. Ventana Systems, Inc. (n.d.). Vensim. Retrieved December 5, 2022, from
  25. Xu, L., Jia, F., Yan, F., & Chen, L. (2022). Circular procurement: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-21 22:36:31

No citation recorded.