skip to main content

EVALUATION OF OFFICE CHAIR DESIGN FROM ERGONOMIC AND ANTHROPOMETRIC PERSPECTIVES

*Taufik Ramadhan Fitrianto  -  Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal, Indonesia
Bahtiar Rahmat  -  Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal, Indonesia
Alfani Risman Nugroho  -  Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal, Indonesia
Galih Prakoso  -  Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal, Indonesia
Anshah Silmi Afifah  -  Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal, Indonesia
Siska Anggiriani  -  Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal, Indonesia
Dhian Juwitasari  -  Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Workplace seating that does not match user anthropometry often leads to discomfort and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This study evaluates the office chairs used at the Politeknik Industri Furnitur dan Pengolahan Kayu Kendal by combining discomfort analysis and anthropometric mismatch assessment. Thirty-two employees (16 males, 16 females) participated, completing the Nordic Body Map (NBM) questionnaire and providing seated anthropometric measurements. The NBM results revealed that lower back discomfort was the most common complaint, particularly among female respondents, who also reported higher discomfort in the neck, shoulders, and upper back. Mismatch analysis confirmed severe incompatibilities between existing chair dimensions and user anthropometry, with seat height (100% mismatch for both genders) and seat depth (94% for men, 88% for women) as the most problematic. Based on these findings, a redesigned chair was developed, lowering seat height by 30 mm and reducing seat depth by 66 mm, alongside adjustments to backrest and armrest dimensions. Comparison with Indonesian (SNI) and international ergonomic standards (ISO 9241-5, BIFMA G1, EN 1335-1) showed that the redesign falls within recommended ranges. The study demonstrates how anthropometry-based redesign can reduce mismatch and improve comfort, providing practical guidance for the local furniture industry.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Data Set
Data Antropometri Tubuh Pegawai
Subject
Type Data Set
  Download (721KB)    Indexing metadata
 Data Set
Hasil Kuesioner Nordic Body Map
Subject
Type Data Set
  Download (46KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: ergonomic chair; anthropometry; mismatch analysis; Nordic Body Map; musculoskeletal disorders

Article Metrics:

  1. Agha, M. H. (2010). Ergonomics in Modern Office Furniture Design. Journal of Design Studies, 21(3), 123–136
  2. Almaz, A. F. H. (2022). The impact of anthropometrics on the functional design of office furniture. International Design Journal, 12(5), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.21608/idj.2022.260291
  3. Chaffin, D. B., Andersson, G. B. J., & Martin, B. J. (2006). Occupational Biomechanics (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons
  4. Himarosa, I. (2019). Designing Office Chairs Based on Ergonomics Principles. Journal of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 5(2), 45–53
  5. Hoque, M., Hossain, M. A., & Rahman, M. A. (2003). The Impact of Seat Height and Depth on Sitting Comfort. Journal of Occupational Health, 45(3), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.45.202
  6. Kautsar, A., & Dewi, R. (2020). Ergonomic seating in the workplace: Implications for musculoskeletal health and productivity. Indonesian Journal of Occupational Health, 15(3), 45–54
  7. Kautsar, A., & Putri, S. (2021). Anthropometric Data in Industrial Design: Application in Furniture Manufacturing. Furniture Industry Research Journal, 22(1), 12–29
  8. Lee, S., De Barros, F. C., De Castro, C. S. M., & De Oliveira Sato, T. (2021). Effect of an ergonomic intervention involving workstation adjustments on musculoskeletal pain in office workers—a randomized controlled clinical trial. Industrial Health, 59(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2020-0188
  9. Maulina, N., Putri, W., & Iskandar, M. (2023). Assessment of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Industrial Settings: An Ergonomic Perspective. Journal of Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 110–121
  10. Milanese, S., & Griemer, M. (2004). The Effect of Workstation Design on Sitting Posture and Perceived Discomfort. Applied Ergonomics, 35(4), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.002
  11. Parcells, C., Stommel, M., & Hubbard, R. P. (1999). Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24(4), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00113-X
  12. Saha, S., Kumar, V., & Desai, R. (2024). Ergonomic Analysis of Seating Dimensions in Office Chairs. Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 30(1), 101–114
  13. Tatar, V., Yazicioglu, O., & Ayvaz, B. (2023). A novel risk assessment model for work-related musculoskeletal disorders in tea harvesting workers. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 44(2), 2305–2323. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-222652
  14. Tissot, F., Messing, K., & Stock, S. (2009). Impact of ergonomics and office chair adjustments on musculoskeletal health: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational Health, 51(5), 301–308
  15. Vieira, E. R., & Kumar, S. (2004). Risk factors and incidence of musculoskeletal disorders in workplace settings. Ergonomics Journal, 47(1), 56–70
  16. Vos, G. A., Congleton, J. J., Steven Moore, J., Amendola, A. A., & Ringer, L. (2006). Postural versus chair design impacts upon interface pressure. Applied Ergonomics, 37(5), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.09.002
  17. Wardaningsih, S. (2010). Analysis of ergonomic risks and pain levels among female machine operators using non-ergonomic chairs. Journal of Industrial Safety and Ergonomics, 12(4), 215–228
  18. Wilson, J. R. (2021). Human Factors in the Workplace: Ergonomic Challenges and Innovations. Taylor & Francis
  19. Zhang, L., Helander, M., & Drury, C. G. (2020). An Ergonomic Approach to Reducing Workplace Musculoskeletal Disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(4), 274–284

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-09-03 08:44:30

No citation recorded.