BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JKLI10018, author = {Rika Kusumo and Onny Setiani and Budiyono Budiyono}, title = {Evaluasi Program Pengendalian Penyakit Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) di Kota Semarang Tahun 2011 (Studi di Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang)}, journal = {Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, year = {2016}, keywords = {}, abstract = { Background : Based on the number of morbidity (Incidence Rate/IR) from 2008 to 2011, DHF in Semarang was ranked first in Central Java .DHF control program in Semarang consists of six aspects, they are the Human Resources (HR), finance, methods, regulations, infrastructure, and community participation. The purpose of this study was to analyze and evaluate the DHF control program in Semarang which include six aspects. Methods : This research used qualitative research. Triangulation was done by conducting interviews on DHF control management with DHF program managers at Department of Health in Semarang, DHF program managers at puskesmas, and community. DHF control program includes inputs, processes and outputs and outcomes. Results: HR quantity of inputs was less 65% for entomologist or epidemiologist, in terms of quality (qualification), HR was sufficient by education level and still less to 50 % based training followed. Financial aspect has been fulfilled properly, according to the proposed budget, but there are still remaining on the implementation of the budget. Outputs from method consists of reporting covers 90%; PE results < 24 hours at 79%; fogging < 5 days at 64%; PJR once a week at 13%; PJB at 100%. Facilities and infrastructure consists of fogging machines, Personal Protect Equipment, ambulances, loudspeaker, and flashlight was sufficient 100%. Laboratorium examination was not accurate. Regulation was implemented by 90%. The results of PSN illustrated community participation by 84% . While the outcomes of DHF control program for as many as 1,303 cases of DHF cases; IR DHF was 73.87 per 100,000 population; CFR 0.77 % and larvae free number 91.18 %. Conclusion : The conclusion is DHF control program in Semarang is not optimal based on indicator inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes. Key word : DHF control program, evaluation, IR, larvae free number }, issn = {2502-7085}, pages = {26--29} doi = {10.14710/jkli.13.1.26 - 29}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkli/article/view/10018} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Based on the number of morbidity (Incidence Rate/IR) from 2008 to 2011, DHF in Semarang was ranked first in Central Java .DHF control program in Semarang consists of six aspects, they are the Human Resources (HR), finance, methods, regulations, infrastructure, and community participation. The purpose of this study was to analyze and evaluate the DHF control program in Semarang which include six aspects.
Methods:This research used qualitative research. Triangulation was done by conducting interviews on DHF control management with DHF program managers at Department of Health in Semarang, DHF program managers at puskesmas, and community. DHF control program includes inputs, processes and outputs and outcomes.
Results: HR quantity of inputs was less 65% for entomologist or epidemiologist, in terms of quality (qualification), HR was sufficient by education level and still less to 50 % based training followed. Financial aspect has been fulfilled properly, according to the proposed budget, but there are still remaining on the implementation of the budget. Outputs from method consists of reporting covers 90%; PE results < 24 hours at 79%; fogging < 5 days at 64%; PJR once a week at 13%; PJB at 100%. Facilities and infrastructure consists of fogging machines, Personal Protect Equipment, ambulances, loudspeaker, and flashlight was sufficient 100%. Laboratorium examination was not accurate. Regulation was implemented by 90%. The results of PSN illustrated community participation by 84% . While the outcomes of DHF control program for as many as 1,303 cases of DHF cases; IR DHF was 73.87 per 100,000 population; CFR 0.77 % and larvae free number 91.18 %.
Conclusion:The conclusion is DHF control program in Semarang is not optimal based on indicator inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes.
Key word : DHF control program, evaluation, IR, larvae free number
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-11-20 22:41:17
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia (JKLI, p-ISSN: 1412-4939, e-ISSN:2502-7085) and Master Program of Environmental Health, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
JKLI journal and Master Program of Environmental Health, Diponegoro University, the Editors and the Advisory Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the JKLI journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form JKLI journal] The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail or scanned document to jkli@live.undip.ac.id.
Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia (e-ISSN: 2502-7085, p-ISSN: 1412-4939) is published by Master of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
