DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.20.1.7-14

Karakteristik Risiko Kesehatan Non-Karsinogenik Akibat Pajanan PM2,5 di Tempat-Tempat Umum Kota Jakarta

Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA, Jakarta, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2020 Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar belakang: Jakarta merupakan salah satu kota metropolitan yang mengalami penurunan kualitas udara. Salah satu komponen udara yang berbahaya bagi kesehatan adalah Particulat Matter 2,5 (PM2,5). Berdasarkan data Air Quality Index pada Oktober 2019, kualitas udara Jakarta setara dengan konsentrasi PM2,5 sebesar 87,9 µg/m3 yang melebihi ambang batas yaitu 65 µg/m3. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis risiko non-karsinogenik akibat paparan PM2,5 di sekitar tempat-tempat umum kota Jakarta.

Metode: Penelitian ini berupa penelitian deskriptif menggunakan studi Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Lingkungan (ARKL) untuk mengetahui tingkat risiko atau Risk Quotient (RQ) pajanan PM2,5 pada radius 0-20 meter setiap lokasi. Jika nilai RQ>1 maka dikategorikan tidak aman, sedangkan nilai RQ≤1 dikategorikan aman.

Hasil: Konsentrasi PM2,5 di semua lokasi secara rata-rata masih di bawah baku mutu. Tingkat risiko pajanan PM2,5 berdasarkan perhitungan asupan atau intakedibandingkan dengan hasil analisis dosis-respon rata-rata dikategorikan aman terutama di masjid dan taman kota. Sedangkan di lokasi lainnya memiliki tingkat risiko pajanan yang dikategorikan tidak aman pada radius 10 meter dari pintu masuk stasiun, titik awal di pintu masuk terminal, dan radius 10 meter dari pintu gerbang sekolah yang memiliki nilai RQ>1 tertinggi.

Simpulan: Beberapa tempat umum masih memiliki risiko tidak aman akibat pajanan PM2,5 terhadap gangguan kesehatan, sehingga strategi pengelolaan diperlukan untuk menurunkan risiko gangguan kesehatan pada masyarakat dan peningkatan kualitas udara.

 

ABSTRACT

Title: Health Risks Assessmet for Non-Carcinogenic PM2,5 Exposure in Public Places in Jakarta

Background: Jakarta is a metropolitan city that has experienced a decline in air quality. One component of air that is harmful is Particulat Matter 2,5 (PM2,5). Based on Air Quality Index data in October 2019, Jakarta's air quality is equivalent to a PM2,5 oncentration of 87,9 μg/m3 which exceeds the threshold of 65 μg / m3. The purpose of this study is to analyze the non-carcinogenic risk due to PM2,5 exposure around public places in the city of Jakarta.

Method: This research is a descriptive study using the Environmental Health Risk Analysis (EHRA) study method to determine the level of risk or Risk Quotient (RQ) of PM2.5 exposure at 0-20 meters in each location.. If the value of RQ> 1 is categorized as unsafe, while the value of RQ≤1 is categorized as safe.

Result: PM2.5 concentrations in all locations were on average still below the quality standard. The level of risk of PM2.5 exposure based on the calculation of intake or intake compared with the results of the average dose-response analysis is considered safe in mosques and park. Meanwhile, other locations have an exposure risk level that is categorized as unsafe at a radius of 10 meters from the station entrance, the starting point at the terminal entrance, and a radius of 10 meters from the school gate that has the highest RQ>1.

Conclusion: Some public places still have an insecure risk due to PM2.5 exposure to health problems, so management strategies are needed to reduce the risk of health problems in the community and increasing air quality.

 

ABSTRACT

Title: Health Risks Assessmet for Non-Carcinogenic PM2,5 Exposure in Public Places in Jakarta

Background:Jakarta is a metropolitan city that has experienced a decline in air quality. One component of air that is harmful is Particulat Matter 2,5 (PM2,5). Based on Air Quality Index data in October 2019, Jakarta's air quality is equivalent to aPM2,5 oncentration of 87,9 μg/m3 which exceeds the threshold of 65 μg / m3. The purpose of this study is to analyze the non-carcinogenic risk due to PM2,5 exposure around public places in the city of Jakarta.

Method: This research is a descriptive study using the Environmental Health Risk Analysis (EHRA) study method to determine the level of risk or Risk Quotient (RQ) of PM2.5 exposure at 0-20 meters in each location.. If the value of RQ> 1 is categorized as unsafe, while the value of RQ≤1 is categorized as safe.

Result:PM2.5 concentrations in all locations were on average still below the quality standard. The level of risk of PM2.5 exposure based on the calculation of intake or intake compared with the results of the average dose-response analysis is considered safe in mosques and park. Meanwhile, other locations have an exposure risk level that is categorized as unsafe at a radius of 10 meters from the station entrance, the starting point at the terminal entrance, and a radius of 10 meters from the school gate that has the highest RQ>1.Conclusion:Some public places still have an insecure risk due to PM2.5 exposure to health problems, so management strategies are needed to reduce the risk of health problems in the community and increasing air quality.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  CTA
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type CTA
  Download (236KB)    Indexing metadata
 Turnitin
Turnitin
Subject
Type Turnitin
  Download (2MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: PM2,5; ARKL; tempat-tempat umum

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Efektifitas Variasi Umpan Pada Fly Trap Dalam Pengendalian Kepadatan Lalat Di Tempat Pembuangan Sementara (TPS) Jalan Andong Yogyakarta Implementasi Kebijakan dan Strategi dalam Pengelolaan Sampah di Kabupaten Blora Nilai LC50 Cymbopogon nardus L terhadap Musca domestica Halaman Sampul Halaman Belakang More recent articles
Most cited articles
Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Angka Kuman Dalam Air Produk Air Minum Isi Ulang di Pemalang Pengaruh Tingkat Pengetahuan dan Sikap Ibu terhadap Penyakit Kecacingan Pada Balita Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Keracunan Merkuri Pada Penambang Emas Tradisional di Desa Jendi Kecamatan Selogiri Kabupaten Wonogiri Faktor Risiko dan Potensi Penularan Tuberkulosis Paru di Kabupaten Kendal , Jawa Tengah Analisis Faktor Risiko Kejadian Pneumonia Pada Balita Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sidorejo Kota Pagar Alam More cited articles
  1. Greenpeace Indonesia. Pembunuhan Senyap di Jakarta: Bagaimana Tingkat Polusi Udara Berbahaya di Kota Jakarta akan Semakin Memburuk. Jakarta; 2017
  2. Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika. PM2,5 Concentration [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.bmkg.go.id/kualitas-udara/informasi-partikulat-pm25.bmkg?lang=EN
  3. Mukhtar R, Hamonangan Panjaitan E, Wahyudi H, Santoso M, Kurniawati S. Komponen Kimia PM2,5 Dan PM10 Di Udara Ambien Di Serpong - Tangerang. J Ecolab. 2013;7(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.20886/jklh.2013.7.1.1-7
  4. Virgianto RH, Akbar D. Analisis Konsentrasi PM2,5 selama Penyelenggaraan Asian Games ke-18 di Jakarta. J Stat dan Mat. 2019;1(1):44-62. https://doi.org/10.32493/sm.v1i1.2370
  5. Alfiah T, Yuliawati E. Analisis Resiko Kesehatan Lingkungan Udara Ambien Terhadap Pengguna Jalan Dan Masyarakat Sekitar Pada Ruas Jalan Ir. Sukarno Surabaya. Infomatek. 2018;20(1):27. https://doi.org/10.23969/infomatek.v20i1.878
  6. WALHI. Kualitas Udara Jakarta Terus Memburuk! Warga Resmi Gugat Gubernur, Menteri hingga Presiden [Internet]. 2019. Available from: http://walhi.or.id/kualitas-udara-jakarta-terus-memburuk-warga-resmi-gugat-gubernur-menteri-hingga-presiden
  7. AirVisual. Jakarta air quality index (AQI) and PM2.5 air pollution is 16 16:00,. 2019;8-11. Available from: https://www.airvisual.com/indonesia/jakarta
  8. Fadhillah F. Hak Atas Lingkungan Hidup yang Baik dan Sehat dalam Konteks Mutu Udara Jakarta. Indones Cent Environ Law. 2018;4(Seri Lembar Pencemaran Udara)
  9. Kementerian Kesehatan. Pedoman Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Lingkungan (ARKL). Jakarta: Direktur Jendral PP dan PL Kementerian Kesehatan; 2012
  10. Rosalia O, Wispriyono B, Kusnoputranto H. Karakteristik Risiko Kesehatan Non Karsinogen pada Remaja Siswa Akibat Pajanan Inhalasi Debu Particulate Matter <2,5 9PM2,5). J Media Kesehat Masy Indones. 2018;14(1):26-35. https://doi.org/10.30597/mkmi.v14i1.2079
  11. Marufi I. Artikel Penelitian Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Lingkungan ( SO 2 , H 2 S , NO 2 dan TSP ) Akibat Transportasi Kendaraan Bermotor di Kota Surabaya. Media Pharm Indones. 2017;1(4):189-96. https://doi.org/10.24123/mpi.v1i4.770
  12. Azizah ITN. Analysis The Level Of PM2,5 And Lung Function Of Organic Fertilizer Industry Workers In Nganjuk. J Kesehat Lingkung. 2019;11(2):141. https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v11i2.2019.141-149
  13. Rahmadini AD, Haryanto B. Dampak Pajanan Particulate Matter 2,5 (PM2,5) terhadap gejala Penyakit Paru Obstruktif (PPOK) Kronis Eksaserbasi Akut pada Pekerja di Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok 2018. J Nas Kesehat Lingkung Glob. 2020;1(1):17-26
  14. Silitonga A, Wispriyono B. Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Pajanan Inhalasi Debu Particulate Matter 2 . 5 pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kota Depok Tahun 2018. J Nas Kesehat Lingkung Glob. 2020;1(1):10-6
  15. Handika RA, Purwaningrum SI, Lestari RA. Analisis Risiko Non Karsinogenik Pajanan PM 10 di Kawasan Komersial Kota Jambi. Serambi Eng. 2019;IV(2):514-21. https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v4i2.1329
  16. Rahmadani R, Tualeka AR. Karakteristik Risiko Kesehatan Akibat Paparan Polutan Udara pada Pekerja Sol Sepatu (Di Sekitar Jalan Raya Bubutan Kota Surabaya). J Kesehat Lingkung. 2016;8(2):164. https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v8i2.2016.164-171
  17. Arba S. Kosentrasi Respirable Debu Particulate Matter ( Pm 2 , 5 ) Dan Gangguan Kesehatan Pada Masyarakat Di Pemukiman Sekitar PLTU. Promot J Kesehat Masy. 2019;9(V):178-84
  18. Faisya AF, Putri DA, Ardillah Y. Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Lingkungan Paparan Hidrogen Sulfida (H2S) dan Ammonia (NH3) Pada Masyarakat Wilayah TPA Sukawinatan Kota Palembang Tahun 2018. J Kesehat Lingkung Indones. 2019;18(2):126. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.18.2.126-134
  19. Katra I, Krasnov H. Exposure assessment of indoor PM levels during extreme dust episodes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051625
  20. Liu Q, Xu C, Ji G, Liu H, Shao W, Zhang C, et al. Effect of exposure to ambient PM2.5 pollution on the risk of respiratory tract diseases: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Biomed Res. 2017;31(2):130-42
  21. World Health Organization. Health Effects of Particulate Matter, Policy Implications for Contries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. Copenhagen; 2013
  22. Guo C, Hoek G, Chang LY, Bo Y, Lin C, Huang B, et al. Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (Pm2:5) and lung function in children, adolescents, and young adults: A longitudinal cohort study. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(12):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5220
  23. Erickson LD, Gale SD, Anderson JE, Brown BL, Hedges DW. Association between Exposure to Air Pollution and Total Gray Matter and Total White Matter Volumes in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Sci. 2020;10(3):164. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10030164
  24. Azni IN, Wispriyono B, Sari M. Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Pajanan PM 10 Pada Pekerja Industri Readymix Pt. X Plant Kebon Nanas Jakarta Timur. J Media Kesehat Masy Indones [Internet]. 2015;10:203-9. Available from: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/212927-analisis-risiko-kesehatan-pajanan-pm10-p.pdf
  25. Kadarisman M, Gunawan A, Ismiyati I. Kebijakan Manajemen Transportasi Darat Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Perekonomian Masyarakat Di Kota Depok. J Manaj Transp Dan Logistik. 2017;3(1):41
  26. https://doi.org/10.25292/j.mtl.v3i1.140
  27. Jahja SGA, Sulistyarso H. Strategi Pengembangan Kebijakan Penurunan Emisi Kendaraan di kawasan Senayan, Jakarta. J Tek ITS. 2020;8(2):114-20
  28. Pamungkas RE, Sulistiyani, Rahardjo M. Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Lingkungan (ARKL) Akibat Paparan Karbonmonoksida (CO) melalui Inhalasi pada Pedagang di Sepanjang Jalan Depan Pasar Projo Ambarawa Kabupaten Semarang. J Kesehat Masy. 2017;5(5):824-31
  29. Pramitha E, Haryanto B. Effect of Exposure to 2.5 µm Indoor Particulate Matter on Adult Lung Function in Jakarta. Osong Public Heal Res Perspect. 2019;10(2):51-5. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.2.02
  30. Rumselly KU. Analisis Risiko Kesehatan Lingkungan Kualitas Udara Ambien Di Kota Ambon. J Kesehatan Lingkungan. 2016;8(2):158-63. https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v8i2.2016.158-163

Last update:

  1. Non-carcinogenic health risk of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentration at high-density neighborhood

    Hafidya Norista Pramesti, Muhammad Agus Ainur Rosyid, Euis Nurul Hidayah. XIV INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ELECTROMACHINING 2023, 3130 , 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0195638

  2. Potensi Risiko Gangguan Kesehatan Akibat Pajanan Gas CH4 dan H2S pada Pekerja TPA Air Dingin, Kota Padang

    Resti Ayu Lestari, Nadia Chalida Nur, Rinda Andhita Regia, Hasnan Habib Marganof, Adhika Dhiwayusja. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia, 23 (3), 2024. doi: 10.14710/jkli.23.3.294-300

  3. Analisis Risiko Mikrobiologi Udara Dalam Ruang di Kantor Kesehatan Pelabuhan Semarang Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19

    Windy Cintya Dewi, Mursid Raharjo, Nur Endah Wahyuningsih. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia, 21 (2), 2022. doi: 10.14710/jkli.21.2.162-169

Last update: 2024-11-19 07:23:02

No citation recorded.