skip to main content

A Multi-Layer Privacy-Preserving Federated AI Framework for Smart Vehicle Cybersecurity

1York University, Canada

2Cisco Systems Inc., United States

Received: 17 Feb 2026; Revised: 14 Jun 2026; Accepted: 14 Jul 2026; Published: 29 Jul 2026.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 The authors. Published by Department of Informatics Universitas, Diponegoro
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Connected and automated vehicles rely on V2X communication, edge devices, cloud services, and onboard sensors, creating large attack surfaces and privacy challenges for conventional centralized intrusion detection systems. This study proposes and evaluates a multi-layer privacy-preserving federated AI framework for smart vehicle cybersecurity. The framework integrates in-vehicle anomaly detection, cloud-based threat correlation, and federated learning to enable collaborative model training without exchanging raw vehicular telemetry data. A hybrid experimental testbed combining NVIDIA Jetson Nano edge nodes, the Flower federated learning framework, PyTorch-based detection models, SUMO mobility simulation, and NS-3 vehicular communication modeling was used to evaluate detection performance, latency, scalability, privacy preservation, attack surface coverage, and adversarial robustness. The results show an F1-score of 0.97, inference latency below 50 ms, 89% robustness under FGSM-based adversarial perturbations, and approximately 14% CPU overhead within the evaluated fleet-size settings. Compared with traditional IDS and cloud-only detection, the proposed framework improves privacy preservation and scalability while maintaining real-time response capability. Blockchain and quantum cryptography are discussed only as potential future research directions and were not experimentally implemented or validated. These findings indicate that federated AI can provide a scalable, privacy-aware, and resilient foundation for securing next-generation smart vehicle environments.

Keywords: Smart vehicle cybersecurity, federated learning, intrusion detection system, privacy-preserving AI, vehicular networks, adversarial robustness

Article Metrics:

  1. K. Ayub and R. Alshawa, “A Novel AI Framework for WBAN Event Correlation in Healthcare: ServiceNow AIOps Approach,” in 2024 IEEE Workshop on Microwave Theory and Technology in Wireless Communications (MTTW), 2024, pp. 55–60. doi: 10.1109/MTTW62915.2024.10768746
  2. V. K. Kukkala, S. V Thiruloga, and S. Pasricha, “Roadmap for Cybersecurity in Autonomous Vehicles,” IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 13–23, 2022, doi: 10.1109/MCE.2022.3154346
  3. A. Haddaji, S. Ayed, L. Chaari Fourati, and L. Merghem Boulahia, “Investigation of Security Threat Datasets for Intra- and Inter-Vehicular Environments,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 891, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24030891
  4. A. Demir and E. İ. Tatlı, “Security Analysis of Medical Devices within Wireless Body Area Networks and Mobile Health Applications,” Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.17671/gazibtd.301668
  5. K. Ayub and R. AlShawa, “Threat Modeling and Security Enhancements in Wireless Body Area Networks for Smart Healthcare,” SSRN, 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5032380
  6. A. Chattopadhyay and K. Y. Lam, “Autonomous Vehicle: Security by Design,” arXiv, 1810.00545, 2018, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.00545
  7. H. Rehan, “The Future of Electric Vehicles: Navigating the Intersection of AI, Cloud Technology, and Cybersecurity,” International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1127-1143, 2024, doi: 10.18535/ijsrm/v12i04.ec04
  8. T. Dargahi, H. Ahmadvand, and M. N. Alraja, “Integration of blockchain with connected and autonomous vehicles: Vision and challenge,” ACM J. Data Inf. Qual., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3460003
  9. G. Kumar and A. Altalbe, “Artificial intelligence (AI) advancements for transportation security: in-depth insights into electric and aerial vehicle systems,” Environ Dev Sustain, vol. 27, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04790-4
  10. G. Loukas, T. Vuong, R. Heartfield, G. Sakellari, Y. Yoon, and D. Gan, “Cloud-based cyber-physical intrusion detection for vehicles using Deep Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 3491–3508, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2782159
  11. K. Ayub and V. Zagurskis, “SMART Incubator: Implementation of Impulse Radio Ultra Wideband Based PA-MAC Architecture in Wireless Body Area Network,” in Proceedings - SIMS 2016: 2nd International Conference on Systems Informatics, Modelling and Simulation, 2016. doi: 10.1109/SIMS.2016.12
  12. A. Weaver, A. von Jouanne, D. Sicker, and A. Yokochi, “Cybersecurity Dynamometer Testbed: A Review to Advance Vehicle-in-the-Loop Testing of Traditional, Connected and Autonomous Vehicles,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 6, pp. 2925–2943, 2025, doi: 10.1109/OJVT.2025.3623913
  13. C. Hodge, H. Konrad, G. Shivam, and B. Jesse, “Vehicle Cybersecurity Threats and Mitigation Approaches,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-5400-74247, 2019. Available at: https://docs.nlr.gov/docs/fy19osti/74247.pdf
  14. K. Ayub and R. Alshawa, “Threat Modelling and Security Enhancements in Wireless Body Area Networks for Smart Healthcare,” Journal of Robotics and Automation Research, vol. 5, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.33140/jrar.05.03.09
  15. J. Takahashi, “An overview of cyber security for connected vehicles,” IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. E101D, no. 11, 2018, doi: 10.1587/transinf.2017ICI0001
  16. M. Singh and R. Dubey, “Deep Learning Model Based CO2 Emissions Prediction Using Vehicle Telematics Sensors Data,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 8, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIV.2021.3102400
  17. M. Levi, Y. Allouche, and A. Kontorovich, “Advanced Analytics for Connected Cars Cyber Security,” in 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), 2017, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/VTCSpring.2017.8108637
  18. S. Nazat, O. Arreche, and M. Abdallah, “On Evaluating Black-Box Explainable AI Methods for Enhancing Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving Systems,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 11, p. 3382, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24113382
  19. Z. Saeed, M. Masood, and M. U. Khan, “A Review: Cybersecurity Challenges and their Solutions in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs),” JAREE (Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering), vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.12962/jaree.v7i1.322
  20. H. Li, D. Ma, B. Medjahed, Y. S. Kim, and P. Mitra, “Analyzing and Preventing Data Privacy Leakage in Connected Vehicle Services,” SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility, vol. 1, no. 3, 2019. doi: 10.4271/2019-01-0478
  21. L. Yang, A. Shami, G. Stevens, and S. De Rusett, “LCCDE: A Decision-Based Ensemble Framework for Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Vehicles,” ArXiv, 2208.03399, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2208.03399
  22. H. Y. Bao et al., “AIOps in Practice: Status Quo and Standardization,” Journal of Software, vol. 34, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006876
  23. R. Chen, X. Chen, and J. Zhao, “Sparsified federated learning with differential privacy for intrusion detection in VANETs based on Fisher Information Matrix,” PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301897
  24. E. Novikova, D. Fomichov, I. Kholod, and E. Filippov, “Analysis of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Open-Source Federated Learning Frameworks for Driver Activity Recognition,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 8, p. 2983, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22082983

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-29 14:30:58

No citation recorded.