skip to main content

Upaya Pencegahan Perbedaan Diagnosis Klinis Dan Diagnosis Asuransi Dengan Diberlakukan Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) Dalam Pelayanan Bpjs Kesehatan Studi Di Rsud Kota Semarang

*Faik Agiwahyuanto  -  Pimpinan Ranting Muhammadiyah Semarang, Indonesia
Sudiro Sudiro  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Inge Hartini  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Percentage of clinical and insurance diagnosis differences at Semarang City Public Hospital tended to increase. If this condition remained, it would lead to upcoding (fraud). The aim of this study was to explain a process of clinical and insurance diagnosis at a hospital in the implementation of Healthcare and Social Security Agency (Health BPJS). This was a qualitative study. Main informants consisted of doctors at an emergency room, surgeons, and internists. Informants for triangulation purpose consisted of a Hospital Director, a hospital verifier, and a head of Medical Record Unit. Data were analysed using content analysis.The results of this research showed that there were any differences in clinical and insurance diagnosis at Semarang City Public Hospital. The cause of these differences was due to differences in diagnosis and medical treatment between medical service standard of doctors at the hospital and a standard of INA-CBGs. To prevent the differences of clinical and insurance diagnosis, the Semarang City Public Hospital had formed an internal verifier team of the hospital and a Clinical Micro System team. A medical committee had a role to minimise the occurrence of upcoding by multiplying kinds of Clinical Pathway as a reference for doctors in diagnosing and determining kinds of treatments for patients.The differences of clinical and insurance diagnosis must be equated to prevent the occurrence of upcoding and disadvantage of the hospital. Efforts to prevent these differences are by adding officers, training coding, making and multiplying algorithm of clinical pathway, forming a team of Clinical Micro System, and monitoring and evaluating medical services.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Diagnosis Klinis; Diagnosis Asuransi; Koding; INA-CBGs; BPJS Kesehatan; JKN; Clinical Diagnosis; Insurance Diagnosis; Coding; INA-CBGs; health BPJS; NHI

Article Metrics:

  1. Anonim. Monitoring Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional di 34 Provinsi di Indonesia : 2014 - mid 2015 Jakarta Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2015 [cited 2015]. 1: [Available from: http://manajemenpembiayaankesehatan.net/
  2. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasiona
  3. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional
  4. Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 85 Tahun 2013 tentang Tata Cara Hubungan antar Lembaga Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional
  5. Anonim. Materi Fraud dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gajah Mada; 2014 [cited 2015 4 Juli]. 1: [Available from: http://course.fk.ugm.ac.id/
  6. Krisna, A. Potensi Fraud pada Ina CBG Jakarta: BPJS; 2014 [cited 2015 4 Juli]. Available from: www.incbg.blogspot.com
  7. Abdullah, AA. Potensi Fraud pada Pelayanan Kesehatan Era JKN dan Upaya Pencegahannya. Fraud pada BPJS. Jakarta: BPJS Kesehatan; 2015
  8. Ichsan, R. Health Insurance. Jakarta: BPJS Kesehatan Negara Indonesia; 2014
  9. Thabrany, H. Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. 1st ed. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada; 2014
  10. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 111 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2013 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan
  11. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 27 Tahun 2014 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Sistem Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBG's)
  12. Firmanda, D. Penyusunan Clinical Pathway Rumah Sakit Bethesda Yogyakarta: Rumah Sakit Bethesda Yogyakarta; 2010 [cited 2015 7 Desember]. Available from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/31425811/Do dy-Firmanda-2010-Clinical-Pathway-RSBethesda
  13. Firmanda, D. Kunci Sukses dan Kendala Pengembangan Penerapan Clinical Pathways di Rumah Sakit. Jakarta: RSUP Fatmawati Jakarta; 2009
  14. Basirun. Sistem Pembiayaan dan Pembayaran Pelayanan Kesehatan Malang: RSJ Dr. Radjiman Wediodiningrat; 2011 [cited 2015 7 Desember]. Available from: http://www.basirun.hostzi.com/ina_cbgs.h tml
  15. Anonim. Sistem INA-CBG's 2012 [cited 2015 7 Desember]. Available from: http://www.klikharry.com/2012/11/21/sist em-ina-cbgs/
  16. Rahma, PA. Implementasi Clinical Pathway untuk Kendali Mutu dan Kendali Biaya Pelayanan Kesehatan. Majalah Dental and Dental. 2013
  17. Firmanda, D. Clinical Pathways Kesehatan Anak. Jurnal Sari Pediatri. 2006; 8(3):195-208
  18. Overill, S. A Practical Guide to Care Pathways. Journal of Integrated Care. 1998; 2(3):93-8
  19. Nopiyani, Ni Made Sri, Indrayathi, dan Putu, Ayu; Listyowati, Rina; Suarjana, I Ketut; dan Januraga, Pande Putu. 2015. “Akses Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional pada Pekerja Seks Perempuan”. Kesmas. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional Vol. 9, No. 4, Mei 2015, hlm. 308-3014
  20. Minister-Health-US. A Roadmap for New Physicians: Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse. Report Fraud. United State: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2011
  21. Sulaeman, Endang, dkk. 2015. Peran Kepemimpinan, Modal Sosial, Akses Informasi serta Petugas dan Fasilitator Kesehatan dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional Vol. 9, No. 4, Mei 2015, hlm. 353-361
  22. Minister-Health-US. Medicare Fraud and Abuse : A Serious Problem that Requires Your Attention. Protecting Yourself & Medicare from Fraud. United State: Medical Learning Network; 2014
  23. Lutfiah, Umi, dkk. 2015. Ketidaktepatan Sasaran Jaminan Kesehatan Masyarakat Berdasarkan Kriteria Miskin Pendataan Program Perlindungan Sosial”. Kesmas. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional Vol. 9, No. 4, Mei 2015, hlm. 362-368
  24. Minister-Health-US. Medicare Fraud and Abuse: Prevention, Detection, and Reporting. Medicare Learning Network. United State: Department of Health and Human Services; 2014
  25. Sutisna, Tri Wisesa, dkk. Penerapan Sistem Remunerasi dan Kinerja Pelayanan”. Kesmas. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional Vol. 10, No. 1, Agustus 2015, hlm. 14-23
  26. Department of Health & Human ServicesUSA. Common Types of Health Care Fraud. United State of America: Department of Health & Human ServicesUSA; 2012
  27. Sparrow, MK. Fraud Control in the Health Care Industry: Assessing the State of the Art. Journal of Art. 1998; 1(1):1-7
  28. Eijkenaar, Frank. 2013. Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs. Eur J Health Econ (2013) 14:117–131. DOI 10.1007/s10198-011-0347-6
  29. Liu, Liping dan Zhu, Dan. 2012. An integrated e-service model for electronic medical records.Original Article. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage (2013) 11:161–183. DOI 10.1007/s10257-012-0188-6. SpringerVerlag 2012
  30. Somogyva´ri, Ma´rta. 2012. The Costs of Organisational Injustice in the Hungarian Health Care System.Original Article. J Bus Ethics (2013) 118:543–560. DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1600-3. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012
  31. Borghi, Josephine, et.al. 2013. Promoting universal financial protection: a case study of new management of community health insurance in Tanzania.Research. Health Research Policy and Systems 2013, 11:21. http://www.health-policysystems.com/content/11/1/21. Biomed Central
  32. Liou, Fen-May, et.al. 2008. Detecting hospital fraud and claim abuse through diabetic outpatient services.Original Article. Health Care Manage Sci (2008) 11:353–358. DOI 10.1007/s10729-0089054-y. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008
  33. Johnson, Marina Evrim dan Nagarur, Nagen. 2015. Multi-stage methodology to detect health insurance claim fraud. Original Article. Health Care Manag Sci. DOI 10.1007/s10729-015-9317-3. Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
  34. Liu, JunQiang dan Chen, Tao. 2013. Sleeping money: investigating the huge surpluses of social health insurance in China.Original Article. Int J Health Care Finance Econ (2013) 13:319–331. DOI 10.1007/s10754-013-9134-5. Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
  35. Hsu, Jen-Ming, et.all. 2016. A MultiConstraint Scheme with Authorized Mechanism for the Patient Safety. Systems-Level Quality Improvement. J Med Syst (2016) 40: 123. DOI 10.1007/s10916-016-0479-4. Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016
  36. Battistella, Roger. 2013. U.S. Universal Health Coverage at a Crossroad. Int Adv Econ Res (2013) 19:409–423. DOI 10.1007/s11294-013-9428-x. International Atlantic Economic Society 2013
  37. Schatman, Michael E. dan Thoman, Janet L. 2015. Valid Psychological Injury Claims: Respecting the Needs of Survivors. Psychol. Inj. and Law (2015) 8:311–322. DOI 10.1007/s12207-0159234-2. Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
  38. Wagner, Anita K, et.al. 2014. Quality use of medicines within universal health coverage: hallenges and opportunities.Debate. BMC Health Services Research 2014, 14:357. http://www.biomedcentral.com/14726963/14/357. Biomed Central
  39. Goldner, Finn, et.al. 2015. Pricing the national health insurance scheme in Qatar-opportunities and challenges. Meeting Abstract. BMC Health Services Research 2015, 15 (Suppl 2): A6. http://www.biomedcentral.com/14726963/15/S2/A6. Biomed Central
  40. Department of Health & Human ServicesUSA. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. In: Department of Health & Human Services-USA. United State of America: Department of Health & Human ServicesUSA; 2012

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-06-19 01:56:17

No citation recorded.