Analisis Pelaksanaan Peran, Fungsi dan Wewenang Governing Body di Rumah Sakit Islam NU Demak

*Rudi Ansyah -  Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Kapuas Raya, Indonesia
Sarsintorini Putra -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Sudiro Sudiro -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Published: 31 Aug 2017.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: INA
Full Text:
Statistics: 80 290
Abstract
Hospital health services have a high level of complexity and are prone to conflicts both inside and outside the hospital. The implementation of quality management is still a lot of obstacles faced evidenced by many hospital staff who do not know about quality management, frequent conflicts and lack of clarity of coordination, communication and information channels. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of the role, function and authority of governing body, director, medical committee and nursing committee, quality management implementation, quality leadership and hospital barrier in order to improve quality management of NU Demak Islamic Hospital. This research design using descriptive method with qualitative approach. The main informants were the governing body, the director, the medical committee and the nursing committee and the triangulation informant were the executing physician, the nurse and the chairman of the quality team. Data were collected by in-depth interview techniques. Processing and data analysis using content analysis. The results show the role and function governing body has been implemented but the authority has not been implemented optimally. The role and authority of the director have been implemented but the function has not been implemented optimally. The role and function of the medical committee has been implemented but the authority has not been implemented optimally. The role and function of the nursing committee has not been implemented optimally but the authority has been implemented. Quality planning has been implemented, but quality control and improvement has not been implemented optimally. Building vision, inspiring processes, mobilizing human resources and becoming a model has been implemented. It is recommended to allocate budgets for the training of the ex-house training, to make guidelines for recording and reporting, to make guidance on performance evaluation of officers, to create a checklist of performance evaluation and to make an assessment of internal satisfaction
Keywords
Implementation Analysis; Governing Body; Quality Management

Article Metrics:

  1. Jacobalis, S. Merancang Hospital Bylaws Indonesia, Rakernas PERSI, Denpasar; 2002.
  2. Keputusan Menteri Kesehaatan Republik Indonesia. No. 772/MENKES/ SK/ VI/ 2002, Tentang Pedoman Peraturan Internal Rumah Sakit (Hospital Bylaws)
  3. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan. No. 631/MENKES/SK/IV/2005 tentang Pedoman Peraturan internal Staf Medis (Medical Staff bylaws) di rumah sakit
  4. Cyril O. Houle, Governing Board, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco; 1997
  5. Undang-Undang Nomor. 44 tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit,
  6. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2014 Tentang Dewan Pengawas Rumah Sakit
  7. Undang-undang Nomor. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas
  8. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 77 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pedoman Organisasi Rumah Sakit
  9. J. Guwandi. Hospital Law (Emerging doctrines and Jurisprudence). Jakarta: FKUI; 2005
  10. Sulastomo. Manajemen Kesehatan. Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2003.
  11. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 755/MENKES/PER/IV/2011 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Komite Medik Di Rumah Sakit
  12. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan No 49 tahun 2013 tentang Komite Keperawatan
  13. Juran, JM. Merancang Mutu, Buku ke 2, Seri Manajemen 164B. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Pressindo; 1996
  14. Nasution, M. N. Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (Total Quality Manajement), Edisi kedua. Bogor: Graha Indonesia; 2005
  15. Juran, JM. Kepemimpinan. Pedoman Peningkatan Mutu untuk Meraih Keunggulan Kompetitif. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Pressindo; 1995
  16. Azrul Azwar. Standar dalam Program Menjaga Mutu. MKMI; 1993
  17. Dep. Kes. RI. Modul Pelatihan Rumah Sakit, Mutu Pelayanan. Depkes. Jakarta; 2008
  18. Amirullah, H. Pengantar Manajemen. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2004
  19. Munro Faure, L dan Munro Faure, M, Implementing Total Quality mananagement Menerapkan Manjemen Mutu Terpadu, Times Management series, British Institute of management, 1997.
  20. Tjiptono, F dan Diana, A. Total Quality Management, edisi revisi, Andi, Yogyakarta, 2003, hal 4-172
  21. Nasution, M. N. Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (Total Management Quality), Edisi kedua, Graha Indonesia, Bogor, 2005.
  22. Gaucher, E.J, Coffey, R. J. Total Quality in Healthcare, From Theory till practice, Jossey-Bass Publisher, San Francisco, 1993
  23. Manus, Burt, Kepemimpinan Visioner, Menciptakan Kesadaran Akan Arah dan Tujuan dalam Organisasi, Alih Bahasa, Frederik Ruma, PT Prenhalindo, Jakarta, 2001
  24. Ulrich, Dave, Leadership in Asia-Challenges and Opportunities, The MsGraw-Hill Cmpanies, 2010
  25. Moleong, Lexy J. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Remaja Rosda Karya; 2006
  26. Arikunto S. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta; 2010
  27. Notoadmodjo, S. Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta; 2010