DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jmki.9.3.2021.183-190

Analisis Insiden Keselamatan Pasien di Rumah Sakit Berdasarkan Pendekatan Beban Kerja dan Komunikasi

*Agus Aan Adriansyah, S.KM., M.Kes. orcid scopus publons  -  Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
Budhi Setianto  -  Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
Nikmatus Sa'adah  -  Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata, Indonesia
Pinky Ayu Marsela Arindis  -  Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
Wahyu Eka Kurniawan  -  Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
Indah Lestari  -  Fakultas Kesehatan, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Patient safety incidents at Ahmad Yani Islamic Hospital Surabaya increased by 0.3% in 2019. If not addressed immediately, these problems can give a negative image to hospitals and patients. An error that appears and has an impact on increasing patient safety incidents, stems from a high workload and poor communication. The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of workload and communication on the occurrence of patient safety incidents in hospitals. This study uses a unit of analysis as many as 18 work units that directly provide services to patients. Participants include the head of the work unit, the person in charge of the work unit and the person in charge of the quality of the work unit with a total of 90 people. The data was obtained primarily using the instrument contained in the google form. The communication measurement tool uses the Communication Openness Measurement (COM) and the workload uses the WISN calculation. Patient safety incident data was obtained from the PMKP RS team. The analysis was carried out by means of a simple cross tabulation with interpretation using the Pareto concept. The results showed that most work units (83.3%) had a low workload, most of the work unit communication (61.1%) was not good and 33.3% of work units had a high patient safety incident rate. In the Pareto concept, the results showed that workload had no effect on patient safety incidents, while communication influenced the number of patient safety incidents. Therefore, hospitals need to fix the pattern and flow of communication as well as the need for information disclosure so that the flow of information becomes more adequate, transfer of knowledge becomes better and employee understanding of the importance of patient safety in hospitals becomes better.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Workload, Communication, Patient Safety Incident, Hospital
Funding: Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Sistem Informasi Pendaftaran Online di Rumah Sakit Nasional Diponegoro Kota Semarang Pengaruh Self Motivation dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Retensi Perawat Siloam Hospital Tb Simatupang Faktor Dominasi Pengembangan Karir terhadap Komitmen Organisasi More recent articles
Most cited articles
Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Kesehatan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Dalam Rangka Penguatan Sistem Informasi Kesehatan Nasional Pelaksanaan Program Perencanaan Persalinan dan Pencegahan Komplikasi (P4K) Ditinjau dari Aspek Bidan Desa sebagai Pelaksana di Kabupaten Jepara Evaluation on the Implementation of Maternal and Child Health Service Reporting by Coordinator Midwives at Primary Healthcare Centers in Nabire District, Papua Province Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Puskesmas Guna Mendukung Penerapan Sikda Generik Menggunakan Metode Hot Fit Di Kabupaten Purworejo Evaluasi Kinerja Sistem Informasi Manajemen Farmasi Di Rs Roemani Muhammadiyah Dengan Metode Hot Fit Model More cited articles
  1. Munandar. Stress dan Keselamatan Kerja Psikologi Industri. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2001
  2. JCI. Patient Safety: Essential For Health Care. New York City: Joint Comission Resource; 2005
  3. Gittel J. A Relational Model of High Performance Work System Work. New York: Organization Science; 2010
  4. Hariyanti M. Pengaruh Beban Kerja terhadap Kelelahan Kerja pada Pekerja Linting Manual di PT Djitoe Indonesia Tobacco Surakarta. Surakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan UMS;
  5. Effendy OU. Dinamika Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja; 2008
  6. Ivancevic K, Matteson. Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2007
  7. Benn J, Koutantji M, Wallace L, Spurgeon P, Rejman M, Healey A, et al. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to iprove patient safety, Clinical safety research unit. London: Imperial College; 2015
  8. Miner MH, Dowson M, Griffin B. Spiritual Resources and Work Engagement Among Religious Workers: A Three_Wave Longitudinal Study. Ocupational Organitational J. 2014;87(2):370–91
  9. Purwanto. Komunikasi antar Lawan Bicara. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2016
  10. Ilyas Y. Kiat Sukses Manajemen Tim Kerja. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2013
  11. Timperley H, Robinson V. The Power of Umpan Balik Workload and the Professional Culture of Teachers. Manag Adm Leadersh Early Career Reseacher. 2000;12(1):200–23
  12. Isyandi B. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Perspektif Global. Bandung: Press Publisher; 2004
  13. Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anesth Scand. 2007;53(2):143–51
  14. Schein EH. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 1992
  15. Carayon P. Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS)Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement and Department of Industrial Engineer-ing. Hum Factors Organ Des Manag. 2003;7(12):21–30
  16. Funke G, Knott BEDA. Conceptualization and Measurement of Team Workload A Critical Need. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 2016;58(2):36–51
  17. Gandhi TK, Graydon BE, Huber CN. Closing the Loop: Followup and Umpan Balik in a Patient Safety Program. J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(1):11–23
  18. Riviwanto M, Imam S. Konsep dan Pendekatan Rumah. Kasjono HS, editor. Yogyakarta: Gosyen Publishing; 2011. 10 p
  19. Henriksen K, Margaret A. Understanding Adverse Events: A Human Factors Framework in quality. In: Patient Safety and Quality:Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. United States: AHRQ Publication; 2018
  20. Walton M. The WHO Patient Safety Curriculum Guide For Medical Schools. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2010;1(19):5542–5246
  21. Jannah N. Hubungan Antara Beban Kerja dengan Kelelahan Kerja pada Karyawan Bagian Cutting Pt. Dan Liris Banaran Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Surakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan UMS; 2014
  22. Zen P. Panduan Komunikasi Efektif untuk Bekal Keperawatan Profesional. Yogyakarta: D-Medika; 2013
  23. Maulita T, Hilda, and Widiastuti HP. Pengaruh Komunikasi Perawat dengan Pasien terhadap Risiko Insiden Keselamatan Pasien di Ruang Rawat Inap Kelas III. Husada Mahakam: Jurnal Kesehatan. 2020; 5(2): 45-51

Last update:

  1. Measures of Nursing Environment Multidimensionality and Patient Centricity Using Importance-Performance Map Analysis

    Andy Andy, Salsabilla Maula Zalfa El-Hamzah, Ferdi Antonio. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 12 (3), 2022. doi: 10.14710/nmjn.v12i3.47508

  2. Types of Patient Safety Incidents in Public Health Centers

    Shinta Nuria, Inge Dhamanti. Media Gizi Kesmas, 12 (2), 2023. doi: 10.20473/mgk.v12i2.2023.795-801

Last update: 2024-11-20 04:25:59

No citation recorded.