skip to main content

Penilaian Implementasi e-Government di PUSTEKOM Kemendikbud berbasis metode PEGI

*Puji Rahayu  -  Perbanas Institute Jakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

According to the Survey UN (United Nations) in 2014, e-government and innovation can provide major opportunities to transform the public administration becomes a tool of sustainable development, provide services more transparent and more accountable. Formerly, the development of government services can be done with a variety of channels, either through online services, big data, social media, mobile applications, or cloud computing, have expanded our perception of e-government services. The research aims to assess the level of achievement of e-Government implementation in the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. Assessment is measured by the Indonesian e-Government Rating framework. The data in this research are obtained by qualitative approach and descriptive data analysis. The finding of this research that the implementation of  e-Government in Ministry of Education and Culture in the category of "Very Good". Based on such an assessment, given the recommendation:  assemblying policies Governance of ICT, aligning the ICT Master Plan by principle of ICT Governance, fulfilling documents related to human Resources of ICT and the application documents, the standardization of domain labeling and e-education, completing information systems/ technogy of management and organizational design, assemblying the development plan of e-education content, and development plans of information system and information technology.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture; Indonesian e-Government Ranking (PEGI); E-Government.

Article Metrics:

  1. Kemenpan, 2011. Peraturan Menteri Pemberdayaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi No.11 tahun 2011 tentang Indikator Keberhasilan Reformasi Birokrasi, Jakarta
  2. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2010. Buku renstra e-Pendidikan periode 2010-2014
  3. Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja (LAKIP), 2013. http://www.kemdiknas.go.id/kemdikbud/tentang-kemdikbud-lakip, diakses terakhir 14 Desember 2014
  4. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2012. Laporan Keuangan Kemdikbud 2012-Audited http://www.kemdiknas.go.id/kemdikbud/tentang-kemdikbud-keuangan/ diakses terakhir 14 Desember 2014
  5. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2012. Laporan Keuangan Kemdikbud 2013-Unaudited, http://www.kemdiknas.go.id/kemdikbud/tentang-kemdikbud-keuangan/ diakses terakhir 14 Desember 2014
  6. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2010. Model sistem layanan berbasis TIK [Draft], Tim Reformasi Birokrasi Internal Pustekkom Kemdikbud
  7. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2014. profil Pustekkom, http://setjen.kemdikbud.go.id/pustekkom/hal-profil.html, diakses terakhir 14 Desember 2014
  8. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2010. Renstra Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan periode 2010-2014, http://www.kemdiknas.go.id/kemdikbud/tentang-kemdikbud-renstra, diakses terakhir 14 Desember 2014
  9. Kemkominfo, 2012. Pemeringkatan E- Government Indonesia [slide Materi Dimensi Pemeringkatan dan Formulir Assesment]. Jakarta
  10. Kemkominfo, 2011. Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor:07/SE/M.KOMINFO/10/2011 tentang Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia (PeGI). Jakarta
  11. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2013. Permen RI No. 99 Tahin 2013 tentang Tata Kelola TIK di lingkugan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia
  12. Pustekkom, 2013. Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia [slide presentasi Tata Kelola TIK di Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI]
  13. Republik Indonesia, 2003. Instruksi Presiden No.6 Tahun 2001 tentang Telematika (Telekomunikasi, Media dan Informatika), Jakarta
  14. Republik Indonesia, 2003. Instruksi Presiden No.3 Tahun 2003 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan e-Government, Jakarta
  15. United Nations, 2014. E-Government Survey 2014 “e-government for the future”, United Nations, New York published

Last update:

  1. Analysis of academic service cybersecurity in university based on framework COBIT 5 using CMMI

    I Riadi, I T R Yanto, E Handoyo. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 821 (1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/821/1/012003
  2. Regulating the Broadband Internet: Towards an Interdisciplinary Analysis

    Christopher T. Marsden. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1578172

Last update: 2024-11-20 11:45:25

No citation recorded.