Perencanaan Enterprise Architecture Pelayanan Informasi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika

*Krismadinata Krismadinata scopus  -  Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
Maya Minangsih  -  Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika Padang Panjang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
Yahfizham Yahfizham  -  Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Unung Verawardina  -  Program Studi Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer, IKIP PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia
Received: 31 Dec 2019; Revised: 9 Nov 2020; Accepted: 10 Nov 2020; Published: 10 Dec 2020; Available online: 10 Dec 2020.
Open Access
Citation Format:
The importance of the research was carried out because of the increasing public demand for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) assisted information system services at the Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency (BMKG). The expansion aims to be done with the concept of Enterprise Architecture (EA) which includes the pattern of The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) which has provided Architecture Development Method (ADM). The method approach used is design research which includes service concepts, architectural design, and the feasibility blueprint for computer-aided information systems in the future. The instrument used was through observation sheets, interview guides and documentation to gather planning information, and using a product questionnaire involving 5 experts consisting of 3 ICT lecturers and 2 business managers, while the practicality test involved 5 respondents. The study took place in BMKG Padang Panjang, West Sumatra Province, from June to September 2019. The data analysis technique in this study used descriptive analysis techniques. This study has produced a design that meets the criteria set out by the standard validity and practicality tests. Based on the results of tests conducted by experts (validator), it was found that the information system service blueprint was feasible to be built with 92% and 82% acceptance of the very valid category in the very practical category. because it is proven valid and practical.
Keywords: Information System Service; EA; TOGAF; ADM

Article Metrics:

  1. Alghamdi, B., L. E. Potter and S. Drew, 2017. Desinge and implementation of government cloud computing requirements: Togaf,” Proc. Ieee, 2017, Pp. 1-6.
  2. Al-Nasrawi, S., and M. Ibrahim, 2013. An enterprise architecture mapping approach for realizing e-government, Proc. International Conference On Communications And Information Technology (Iccit), 2013, Pp. 17–21.
  3. Apriyanto, R.D., dan H.P. Putro, 2018. Tingkat kegagalan dan keberhasilan proyek sistem informasi di Indonesia, Proc. Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 2018, Pp. 395–402.
  4. Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. Drm: A Design Research Methodology. Springer. 2009.
  5. Brosius, M., S. Aier, and M. K. Haki, 2017. Introducing a coordination perspective to enterprise architecture management research, Proc. Ieee 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Work, 2017, Pp. 71–78.
  6. Delima, R., H.B. Santoso and J. Purwadi, 2016. Architecture vision for indonesian integrated agriculture information systems using Togaf Framework, Proc. Ieee International Conference On Informatics And Computing (Icic), 2016, Pp. 1–6.
  7. Edward, I.Y.M.., 2014. E-government master plan design with Togaf framework, Proc. Ieee, 2014. Pp 1-6.
  8. Gil-Garcia, J.R., S.S. Dawes, and T. A. Pardo, 2018. Digital Government and public management research : finding the crossroads, Public Manag. Rev., Volume 20 (5), 2018, Pages 633–646, Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
  9. Hatakka, M., 2018. Introduction To ‘Ict4d: Icts And Sustainable development’ minitrack, Proc. Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences, Volume 27(2), 2018, Pp.2403-2412.
  10. Hinkelmann, K., 2015. Computers in industry a new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and it: combining anterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology, Comput. Ind., 2015, Pages 1-10, Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/ J.Compind.2015.07.009.
  11. Hodijah, A., S. Sundari and A.C. Nugraha, 2018. Applying Togaf for e-government implementation based on service oriented architecture methodology towards good government governance,” Proc. Iop Conf. Series: Journal Of Physics: Conf. Series 1013, 2018, Pp.1-8.
  12. Jørgensen, M., 2016. A survey on the characteristics of projects with success in delivering client benefits, Information and Software Technology, Volume 78, 2016, Pages 83–94, Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Infsof.2016.05.008.
  13. Jugel D., and C.M. Schweda, 2014. Interactive functions of a cockpit for enterprise architecture planning, Proc. Ieee 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops And Demonstrations, 2014, Pp. 33-40.
  14. Kearny, C., A. Gerber, and A. Van Der Merwe, 2016. Data driven enterprise architecture and the togaf adm phases, Proc. Ieee International Conference On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics, 2016, Pp. 4603–4608.
  15. Krismadinata, 2018. Kontribusi ekspektasi kinerja, usaha, faktor sosial dan fasilitas terhadap sikap operator sistem informasi, Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi (Teknosi), Volume 4(1), April 2018, Pages 44–52, Https://Dx.Doi.Org/10.25077/Teknosi.V4i1.2018.44-52.
  16. Majchrzak, A., M.L. Markus, F., and J. Wareham, 2016. Designing for digital transformation : lessons for information systems research from the study of ict and societal challenges, Mis Quarterly, Volume 40(2), June 2016. Pages 267–277, .
  17. Mansur dan Kasmawi, 2017. Pengembangan sistem database terpadu berbasis web untuk penyediaan layanan informasi website desa, Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi (Teknosi), Volume 3 (1), April 2017, Pages 73-82, Http://Dx.Doi.Org/ 10.25077/Teknosi.V3i1.2017.73-82.
  18. Marwiyanto, J., 2014. Enterprise architecture planning sistem informasi pelayanan publik menggunakan Zachman Framework di Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta. Tesis. Yogyakarta: UGM.
  19. Mayer, N., 2016. An integrated conceptual model for information system security risk management and enterprise architecture management based on Togaf, Ifip International Federation For Information Processing, 2016, Pages 353–361, Http:// Dx.Doi.Org/10.1007/978-3-319-48393-1_27.
  20. Najwa, N.F., dan A. N. Izzati, 2018. Literatur review hubungan budaya organisasi dan berbagi pengetahuan dalam kesuksesan implementasi sistem informasi, Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi (Teknosi), Volume 01, April 2018, Pages 1–8, Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.25077/Teknosi.V4i1.2018.1-8.
  21. Nakakawa, A., P.V. Bommel and H.A.E. Proper, 2013. Supplementing enterprise architecture approaches with support for executing collaborative tasks — A Case Of Togaf Adm," International Journal Of Cooperative Information Systems, Volume 22(2), 2013, Pages 1-79, Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1142/ S021884301350007x.
  22. Ni, F., And R. Li, 2017. Togaf For Agile Soa Modelling,” Proc. Iscc, 2017, Pp. 1–7.
  23. Ordiyasa, I.W., 2015. Kegagalan penerapan e-goverment di negara-negara berkembang, Proc. Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia, 2015, Pp. 6–8.
  24. Rais, A.A., and R. Pecinovsky, 2013. Togaf usage in outsourcing of software development, Acta Inform. Pragensia, Volume 2 (2), 2013, Pages 68–76, Https://Doi.Org/10.18267/ J.Aip.25.
  25. Rouhani, B.D., 2015. A systematic literature review on enterprise architecture implementation methodologies,” information and software technology, Volume 62, 2015, Pages 1–20, Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/ J.Infsof.2015.01.012.
  26. Setyadi, Daru Hagni, 2015. Modifikasi Togaf untuk membangun architecture framework untuk pengembangan e-government pada pemerintah tingkat kabupaten/kota. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.
  27. Sitokdana, M.N.N., 2015. Evaluasi implementasi egovernment pada situs web pemerintah Kota Surabaya, Medan, Banjarmasin, Makassar dan Jayapura, Jurnal Buana Informatika, Volume 6 (4), Oktober 2015, Pages 289–300.
  28. Sunaryo, B., 2016. Sistem informasi manajemen perangkat elektronik berbasis web, Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi (Teknosi), Volume 2(1), April 2016, Pages 75-82, Https://Dx.Doi.Org/ 10.25077/Teknosi.V2i1.2016.75-82.
  29. Tao, Z-G., 2015. Enterprise application architecture development based on Dodaf And Togaf,” Enterprise Information Systems, 2015, Pages 1-24, Http://Dx.Doi/10.1080/17517575.2015. 1068374.
  30. The Open Group. Togaf® Version 9.1, An Open Group Standard. 2011.
  31. Tukino dan Amrizal, 2017. Perancangan sistem informasi pelaporan transaksi berbasis web pada Pt Pos Indonesia Batam, Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi (Teknosi), Volume 3 (1), April 2017, Pages 199-210, Https://Dx.Doi.Org/10.25077/Teknosi.V3i1.2017.199-210.
  32. Wahab, I.H.A., and A. Arif, 2015. An integrative framework of Cobit and Togaf for designing it governance in local government, Proc. Int. Conference On Information Technology, Computer And Electrical Engineering (Icitacee), 2015, Pp. 36–40.
  33. Yamamoto, S., 2014. A knowledge integration approach of safety-critical software development and operation based on the method architecture, Procedia Comput. Sci., Volume 35, 2014, Pages 1718–1727. https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Procs.2014.08.26.
  34. Yuliana R., and B. Raharjo, 2016. Designing an agile enterprise architecture for mining company by using Togaf framework, Proc. Ieee, 2016, Pp.1-6.
  35. Zhao, Y., and B. Fan, 2018. Exploring Open Government Data Capacity Of Government Agency: Based On The Resource-Based Theory,” Gov. Inf. Q., Volume 35 (1), 2018, Pages 1–12, Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Giq.2018.01.002.

Last update: 2021-01-16 11:42:59

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-01-16 11:43:00

No citation recorded.