skip to main content

Evaluating the Success of Learning Management Systems using the EESS Model and Expected Confirmation Theory

*Arya Krizna Nawanda  -  Information System Department, Information Technology Faculty, Satya Wacana Christian University, Indonesia
Johan Jimmy Carter Tambotoh orcid  -  Information System Department, Information Technology Faculty, Satya Wacana Christian University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis

Citation Format:
Abstract

E-learning and LMS (Learning Management Systems) have been implemented in most universities to modernize learning and assist in the learning process of university students. This study aims to explore the factors that can be used to measure e-learning system success using the EESS (Evaluating E-learning System Success) model and Expectation and Confirmation Theory (ECT). A quantitative research method was employed, using questionnaires to collect data on users’ perceptions of LMS. The collected data were then statistically analyzed using the PLS-SEM method with SmartPLS 3.2.9. Results revealed that out of 29 hypotheses, 16 were accepted and 13 were rejected. A novel discovery was that ECT can be implemented in the EESS model. Three hypotheses involving expectation confirmation had p-values of  0.001, 0.000, and 0.000, indicating significant roles. The study concluded that incorporating expectation confirmation quality into the EESS model enhances its effectiveness by providing a comprehensive perspective.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: E-learning; LMS; EESS; PLS-SEM; ECT

Article Metrics:

  1. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., Sinclair, J., 2020. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  2. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., Oliveira, T., 2017. Grit in the Path to e-Learning Success. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 388-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.10.009
  3. Chen, W.S., Yao, A.Y.T., 2016. An Empirical Evaluation of Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction in Blended Learning: A Pilot Study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667-1671. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040719
  4. Cidral, W.A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., Aparicio, M., 2018. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian Empirical Study. Computers & Education, 122, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2017.12.001
  5. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  6. Hair Jr., J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt M., Danks, N.P., Ray, S., 2021. Classroom Companion: Business Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer Cham: AWorkbook. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  7. Hamid, R.S., Anwar, S.M., 2019. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Berbasis Varian: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi dengan Program SmartPLS 3.2.8 dalam Riset Bisnis. Jakarta : Inkubator Penulis Indonesia
  8. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M.R., 2008. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model FIT. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60
  9. Hossain, M.A., Quaddus, M., 2012. Expectation–Confirmation Theory in Information System Research: A Review and Analysis, 28, 441-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_21
  10. Hsu, C.L., Lin, J.C.C., 2015. What Drives Purchase Intention for Paid Mobile Apps?-An Expectation Confirmation Model with Perceived Value. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2014.11.003
  11. Oghuma, A.P., Libaque-Saenz, C.F., Wong, S.F., Chang, Y., 2016. An Expectation-Confirmation Model of Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Instant Messaging. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.006
  12. Park, E., 2020. User Acceptance of Smart Wearable Devices: An Expectation-Confirmation Model Approach. Telematics and Informatics, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101318
  13. Petter, S., Delone, W., McLean, E.R., 2012. The Past, Present, and Future of “IS success. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00296
  14. Rosetta, A., Priska, M.A., Muslim, E., Rafi, M., 2020. Evaluating the Success of E-Learning Systems and Strategy Creation: The Perspective of Students in Universitas Indonesia. ICEEL '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Education and E-Learning, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439147.3439155
  15. Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., Cabrera, N., 2012. Building an Inclusive Definition of e-Learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161
  16. Tam, C., Santos, D., Oliveira, T., 2020. Exploring the Influential Factors of Continuance Intention to use Mobile Apps: Extending the Expectation Confirmation Model. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(1), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9864-5
  17. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V.E., Chatelin, Y.M., Lauro, C., 2005. PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  18. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., Budgen, D., 2010. Does the Technology Acceptance Model Predict Actual Use? A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2009.11.005
  19. Urbach, N., Ahlemann, F., 2010. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Application in Customer Satisfaction Research. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 5-40
  20. Üstünel, H.H., 2016. The Influence of Critical Factors on E-Learning Satisfaction Kritik Faktörlerin E-Öğrenme Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi. Başkent University Journal Of Education, 3(2), 99-123
  21. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X., 2016. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-10-31 17:04:08

No citation recorded.