skip to main content

Penerapan ANP-TOPSIS untuk Pengukuran Kinerja Human ResourcesProcurement Section

*Moh Ramdhan Arif Kaluku  -  Jurusan Teknik Informatika Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
Ferry Jie  -  Business IT & Logistics Unit MRIT University, Melbourne, Indonesia

Citation Format:

One practice is important in a company's performance is in the process of procurement. Performance of human resources in a company shows a measure of the quality of work and is used as a measure to observe the performance levels of employees in a company. The level of underperformance will have an impact on the quality of jobs that will be performed that could have a serious impact on the company. It is necessary to develop a human resources performance measurement using ANP method and TOPSIS, the procurement section of the company. This study aims to assist in the decision making process and seek alternative solutions to address the issues in order to measure the level of performance of each employee. In this study, the method used to obtain the ANP normal weight that will be used for calculations on TOPSIS method. The input parameters in the weighting process ANP is also very affecting for ranking process to be performed on TOPSIS. The input parameter is the ratio of any existing KPI indicators on procurement section. The results showed that the proposed method can be used to build a predictive performance measurement on procurement human resources section. From the research the highest performance values obtained on procurement section is 0.6936 while the lowest value was 0.3584.



Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: ANP; TOPSIS; KPI; Human Resources; Procurement Section

Article Metrics:

  1. Behzadiana, M., Otaghsara, S.K., Yazdani, M., Ignatius, J, 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012) 13051–13069
  2. Buller, P.F. and McEvoy, G.M., 2012. Strategy Human Resource Management and Performance: Sharpening Line of Sight, Human Resource Management Review 22, 43–56
  3. Cai, J., Liu, X., Xiao, Z., dan Liu, J, 2009. Improving Supply Chain Performance Management: a Systematic Approach to Analyzing Iterative KPI Accomplishment, Decision Support Systems 46, 512–521
  4. Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., Wardoyo, R., 2006. Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta
  5. Parmenter, D, 2007. Developing, Implementing and Using Winning KPIs, John Wiley & Sons
  6. Saaty, T.L., 1999. Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. ISAHP Japan, pp. 12–14
  7. Saaty, T.L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1
  8. Shyur, H.J., 2006. Cots Evaluation Using Modified TOPSIS and ANP, Applied Mathematics and Computation 177, 251–259
  9. Silva, L.C., dan Costa, A.P.C.S, 2013. Decision Model for Allocating Human Resources In Information System Projects, International Journal of Project Management 31 (2013) 100–108
  10. Wu, C.S., Lin, C.T., dan Lee, C., 2010. Optimal Marketing Strategy: A Decision-Making with ANP and TOPSIS, Int. J. Production Economics 127, 190–196
  11. Zhu, X., Wang, F., Liang, C., Li, J.,dan Sun, X., 2012. Quality credit evaluation based on TOPSIS: Evidence From Air-Conditioning Market In China, Procedia Computer Science, 9, 1256 – 1262

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-20 16:12:40

No citation recorded.