DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v18i1.34964

Transmission Coefficient Analysis of Notched Shape Floating Breakwater Using Volume of Fluid Method: A Numerical Study

*Asfarur Ridlwan  -  Department of Ocean Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Indonesia
Haryo Dwito Armono orcid scopus  -  Department of Ocean Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Shade Rahmawati orcid scopus  -  Department of Ocean Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Tuswan Tuswan orcid scopus  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract
As one of the coastal structures, breakwaters are built to protect the coastal area against waves. The current application of breakwaters is usually conventional breakwaters, such as the rubble mound type. Climate change, which causes tidal variations, sea level height, and unsuitable soil conditions that cause large structural loads, can be solved more economically by employing floating breakwater. In this study, numerical simulations will be conducted by exploring the optimum floating breakwater notched shapes from the Christensen experiment. The comparison of three proposed floating breakwater models, such as square notch (SQ), circular notch (CN), and triangular notch (VN), is compared with standard pontoon (RG) to optimize the transmission coefficient value is analyzed. Numerical simulations are conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based on the VOF method with Flow 3D Software. Compared to the experimental study, the RG model's validation shows a good result with an error rate of 8.5%. The comparative results of the floating breakwater models are found that the smaller the transmission coefficient value, the more optimal the model. The SQ structure has the smallest transmission coefficient of 0.6248. It can be summarized that the SQ model is the most optimal floating breakwater structure.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: CFD; Floating breakwaters; Porous breakwaters; Transmission coefficient; Volume of fluid

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Front-Matter V. 18, No. 1 Cover V. 18, No. 1 Back-Matter V. 18, No. 1 Transmission Coefficient Analysis of Notched Shape Floating Breakwater Using Volume of Fluid Method: A Numerical Study Comparative Analysis of Taper and Taperless Blade Design for Ocean Wind Turbines in Ciheras Coastline, West Java Study on Implementation of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) System on Determination of Indirect Costs in Ship Production More recent articles
Most cited articles
PENGARUH ANTI-SLAMMING BULBOUS BOW TERHADAP GERAKAN SLAMMING PADA KAPAL PERINTIS 200 DWT ANALISIS KEKUATAN STRUKTUR PADA KAPAL WISATA SUNGAI KALIMAS ANALISA TEKNIS KEKUATAN MEKANIS MATERIAL KOMPOSIT BERPENGUAT SERAT AMPAS TEBU (BAGGASE) DITINJAU DARI KEKUATAN TARIK DAN IMPAK ANALISA GERAKAN SEAKEEPING KAPAL PADA GELOMBANG REGULER Estimation of Effective Wave Slope Coefficient of Ships with Large Breadth and Draught Ratio More cited articles
  1. J. Dai, C. M. Wang, T. Utsunomiya, and W. Duan, “Review of recent research and developments on floating breakwaters,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 158, pp. 132–151, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.083
  2. A. C. Biesheuvel, 2013. Effectiveness of Floating Breakwaters: wave attenuating floating structures. Master of Science Thesis. Delft University of Technology: Netherlands
  3. C. Y. Ji, X. Q. Bian, Y. Cheng, and K. Yang, “Experimental study of hydrodynamic performance for double-row rectangular floating breakwaters with porous plates,” Ships Offshore Structures, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 737–746, 2019. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1558521
  4. E. D. Christensen, H. B. Bingham, A. P. Skou Friis, A. K. Larsen, and K. L. Jensen, “An experimental and numerical study of floating breakwaters,” Coastal Engineering, vol. 137, pp. 43–58, 2018., doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.03.002
  5. I. H. Cho, “Transmission coefficients of a floating rectangular breakwater with porous side plates,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2015.10.002
  6. H. Y. Wang and Z. C. Sun, “Experimental study of a porous floating breakwater,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 37, pp. 520–527, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.12.005
  7. C-Y. Ji, X. Chen, J. Cui, Z-M. Yuan, A. Incecik, “Experimental Study of a New Type of Floating Breakwater,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 105, pp. 295–303, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.046
  8. C-Y. Ji, Y-C. GUO, J. Cui, Z-M. Yuan, X-J. Ma. “3D experimental study on a cylindrical floating breakwater system,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 125, pp. 38-50, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.07.051
  9. C-Y. Ji, Y. Cheng, K. Yang, G. Oleg, “Numerical and experimental investigation of hydrodynamic performance of cylindrical dual pontoon-net floating breakwater.” Coastal Engineering. Vol. 129, pp. 1-16, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.013
  10. M. A. Rahman, N. Mizutani, and K. Kawasaki, “Numerical modeling of dynamic responses and mooring forces of submerged floating breakwater,” Coastal Engineering, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 799–815, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2006.04.001
  11. X. Liu, Y. Liu, P. Lin, A-J. Li, “Numerical simulation of wave overtopping above perforated caisson breakwaters,” Coastal Engineering, vol. 163, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103795
  12. S. F. Abdullah, A. Fitriadhy, M. Hairil, and A. Jusoh, “Hydrodynamic performance of cylindrical floating breakwater in waves,” International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 4715–4729, 2017, doi: 10.15282/ijame.14.4.2017.10.0371
  13. Z. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Wang, X. Hua, "Numerical modelling and optimization of a winged box-type floating breakwater by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics," Coastal Engineering, vol. 188, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106246
  14. Z. Liu, Y. Wang, "Numerical investigations and optimizations of typical submerged box-type floating breakwaters using SPH," Ocean Engineering, vol. 209, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107475
  15. J. M. Zhan, X-B. Chen, Y-J. Gong, W-Q. Hu, "Numerical investigation of the interaction between an inverse T-type fixed/floating breakwater and regular/irregular waves," Ocean Engineering, vol. 137, pp. 110-119, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.058
  16. K-L. Jeong, Y-G. Lee, "Numerical simulations of two-dimensional floating breakwaters in regular waves using fixed cartesian grid," International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 206-218, 2014 doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0173
  17. I. Flow Science, “FLOW-3D Documentation v11.” p. 330, 2014
  18. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Manual, In 6 Volum. Washington D.C, 2006
  19. N. Koutsourakis, J. G. Bartzis, N. C. Markatos, “Evaluation of Reynolds stress, k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulence models in street canyon flows using various experimental datasets,” Environmental Fluid Mechanics, vol. 12, pp. 379–403, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10652-012-9240-9
  20. S. Kim, H. Kim, “A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecast,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 669-679, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.12.003

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-20 20:31:37

No citation recorded.