skip to main content

Ship Propeller Design using Open-Source Codes based on Lifting Line Theory

*Erik Sugianto orcid scopus publons  -  Department of Marine Engineering, Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya, Indonesia
Niki Veranda Agil Permadi orcid scopus  -  Department of Marine Engineering, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia
Ahmad Darori Hasan orcid scopus  -  Department of System and Naval Mechatronic Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Received: 4 May 2025; Revised: 25 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Jun 2025; Available online: 25 Jun 2025; Published: 30 Jun 2025.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The design of a ship's propeller is very important as it directly affects the fuel efficiency, speed, and stability of the ship. Commonly, propellers are designed using expensive commercial software. This research aims to design a ship propeller using open-source code based on lifting line theory and using MATLAB application. The ship data used is a container ship with a length of 397 meters and a width of 56 meters. The propeller design results were propeller performance such as design performance, induced velocity, inflow angle, expanded blade, blade thickness, lift coefficient, performance curve, 2-D and 3-D outlines. A qualitative and quantitative comparison was conducted between a real-world manufactured propeller, a redesigned propeller developed using open-source software (OpenProp), and a commercial design tool (PropCAD). The comparison reveals that while the overall geometry and blade shape of all three propellers are similar, consisting of 6 blades with comparable radial profiles, key differences emerge in the expanded area ratio (EAR), skew angle, and surface modeling quality. The OpenProp design features an EAR of 1.0876 and a high skew angle of 39.9°, indicating an emphasis on hydrodynamic efficiency and cavitation mitigation. In contrast, the PropCAD model presents a slightly lower EAR of 1.077 with a more moderate skew angle of 20.5°, offering a balanced compromise between performance and manufacturability. This distinction highlights a potential optimization opportunity and demonstrates the capability of the open-source design approach to approximate real-world propeller characteristics with high fidelity, while also offering flexibility for further refinement. In summary, the findings suggest that the open-source design approach can approximate real-world propeller characteristics with high fidelity and provide flexibility for iterative optimization.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Lifting line theory; propeller; open-source code; propeller performance.

Article Metrics:

  1. G. Dubbioso, R. Muscari, F. Ortolani, and A. Di Mascio, “Numerical analysis of marine propellers low frequency noise during maneuvering. Part II: Passive and active noise control strategies,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 125, 103201, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103201
  2. A. Iswantoro, J. Raharjo, and Y. Iwangsa Sima, “Performance and Vibration Analysis of Electric Outboard Propulsion using Propeller Variations Based on Experiment," Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 145-155, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v21i3.66599
  3. A. Winarno, G. A. N. S. Sakti, and E. Sugianto, "The Effect of Tip Clearance Kaplan Ducted Propeller in Offshore Supply Vessel (OSV) on Hydrodynamics," Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 156-170, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v21i3.64772
  4. D. Wahyudi, A. N. Coutsar, and P. A. Nugroho, "The Effect of Speed On Bow Thruster Tunnel Acoustics Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods," Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45-51, Apr. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v22i1.69453
  5. P. Majumder, & S. Maity, “A critical review of different works on marine propellers over the last three decades,” Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 18, no.3, pp. 391-413, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2022.2058767
  6. N. V. A Permadi, E. Sugianto, “CFD Simulation Model for Optimum Design of B-Series Propeller Using Multiple Reference Frame (MRF).” CFD Letters, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 22-39, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.14.11.2239
  7. J. U. Mba, “Advancing sustainability and efficiency in maritime operations: Integrating green technologies and autonomous systems in global shipping.” International Journal of Science and Research Archive, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 2059-2079, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2419
  8. H. Singh, “Survey of new energetic and eco-friendly materials for propulsion of space vehicles.” Chemical rocket propulsion: A comprehensive survey of energetic materials, pp. 127-138, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27748-6_4
  9. M. M. Shora, H. Ghassemi, & H. Nowruzi, “Using computational fluid dynamic and artificial neural networks to predict the performance and cavitation volume of a propeller under different geometrical and physical characteristics.” Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 59-84, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2017.1300983
  10. N. P Purba, I. Faizal, D.A. Valino, H.S. Kang, E. Sugianto, M.K. Martasuganda, ... & A. M. A. Khan, “Development of autonomous multi-sensor ocean monitoring instrument designed for complex archipelagic waters,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 11451-11460, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04772-5
  11. D. Weintraub, J. Koppelberg, J. Köhler, and P. Jeschke, “Ducted fans for hybrid electric propulsion of small aircraft,” CEAS Aeronautical Journal, vol.13, no.2, 471-485, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-022-00573-7
  12. J. B. Kodman, B. Singh, and M. Murugaiah, “A Comprehensive Survey of Open-Source Tools for Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis,” Jounal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 123-148, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.119.2.123148
  13. K. Αναστασίου, Hydrodynamic analysis of a marine propeller in open water conditions using the computational code OpenFoam. University of West Attica, 2024, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26265/polynoe-7835
  14. M. Liu, H. J. Wang, and J. L. Zhao, “Technology flexibility as enabler of robust application development in community source: The case of Kuali and Sakai,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 2921-2928, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.026
  15. S. Buckingham Shum, K. Aberer, A. Schmidt, S. Bishop, P. Lukowicz, S.Anderson, Y. Charalabidis, J. Domingue, S. de Freitas, I. Dunwell, B. Edmonds, F. Grey, M. Haklay, M. Jelasity, A. Karpištšenko, J. Kohlhammer, J. Lewis, J. Pitt, R. Sumner & D. Helbing, “Towards a global participatory platform: democratising open data, complexity science and collective intelligence,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 214, pp. 109-152, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01690-3
  16. B. Epps, J. Chalfant, R. imball, A. Techet, K. Flood, & C. Chryssostomidis, “OpenProp: An open-source parametric design and analysis tool for propellers, In Proceedings of the 2009 grand challenges in modeling & simulation conference, pp. 104-111, July, 2009
  17. W. Zhang, L. Wu, X. Jiang, X. Feng, , Y. Li, J. Zeng, & C. Liu, “Propeller design for an autonomous underwater vehicle by the lifting-line method based on OpenProp and CFD,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 106-114, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00275-w
  18. B. Epps, 2010. “OpenProp v2.4 Theory Document”, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a50d4c0fd133226578b6e9d9977ec8bb19c221ef
  19. Dartmouth University. (2024). OpenProp 3.3.4 source code and documentation. http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/openprop/openprop1a2s3f976265E526hhl234l6tv487nyy4vy336v.htmlhttp://www.containership-info.com/vessel_9260421.html
  20. E. Sugianto, J-H. Chen, and N. V. A. Permadi, “Effect of Monohull Type and Catamaran Hull Type on Ocean Waste Collection Behavior Using OpenFOAM,” Water, vol. 14, no. 17, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172623
  21. E. Sugianto, J-H. Chen, and N. P. Purba, “Cleaning technology for marine debris: A review of current status and evaluation,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 4549-4568, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04373-8
  22. O. K. Kinaci, A. Kukner, and S. Bal, “On Propeller Performance of DTC Post-Panamax Container Ship”, International Journal of Ocean System Engineering, vol. 3, no.2, pp. 77-89, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5574/IJOSE.2012.3.2.077

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-09-08 22:13:47

No citation recorded.