DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v22i2.74393

Ship Maneuvering Simulation to Determine Elements of Tugboat Handling: A Case Study of Paciran Port

*Esqy Dhiya'ul Fuady  -  Safety and Risk Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia
I Putu Sindhu Asmara  -  Safety and Risk Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia
Imam Sutrisno  -  Safety and Risk Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia
Received: 12 Jun 2025; Published: 11 Aug 2025.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Paciran Port, serving as a multipurpose facility for both cargo transport and ferry services, plays a crucial role in the transportation network of East Java province. With a significant increase in vessel visits, particularly barges carrying limestone, ensuring safety during ship berthing operations has become a critical concern. This study aims to identify the key elements of tugboat handling required for safely berthing a barge. The element consists of the percentage of tugboat capacity, the heading of the tugboat, the time series, and the duration. In this study, ship berthing maneuver simulations are based on the Maneuvering Modelling Group (MMG) method. The prediction of the ship's maneuvering motion is simulated using MATLAB software within a 3-DOF (Degree of Freedom) framework. A simulation was conducted across four scenarios by varying the environmental conditions of wind direction, wind speed, current direction, and current speed. Each environmental condition varies into two initial speeds (0 knots and 2.9 knots). The berthing speed limits follow the PIANC standard. The results show that the element of tugboat handling angle can assist the barge to safely berth under diverse environmental conditions and initial speeds, with final berthing speeds consistently below 0.3 m/s (0.58 knots), which falls within the moderate condition category according to PIANC standards. Trajectory analyses further affirmed that the barge remained within the designated Paciran Port channel throughout all simulated scenarios.

Fulltext

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Optimization of Safety and Reliability of Electrical Systems of Tourist Ships in Labuan Bajo through FMEA Utilizing ANP for a Comprehensive Risk Assessment and Mitigation Prioritization of Lithium Battery Energy Storage Systems (LBESS) on Commissioning Service Operation Vessels (CSOV) Ship Propeller Design using Open-Source Codes based on Lifting Line Theory More recent articles
Most cited articles
PERANCANGAN FLOATING DOCK UNTUK DAERAH PERAIRAN PELABUHAN KOTA TEGAL OPTIMASI BENTUK DEMIHULL KAPAL KATAMARAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS SEAKEEPING ANALISA NUMERIK GERAKAN DAN KEKUATAN KAPAL AKIBAT BEBAN SLAMMING PADA KAPAL PERANG TIPE CORVETTE ANALISIS KEKUATAN STRUKTUR PADA KAPAL WISATA SUNGAI KALIMAS ANALISA GERAKAN SEAKEEPING KAPAL PADA GELOMBANG REGULER More cited articles
  1. G. Hejun, F. Fuquan, J. Xiaobin, W. Deling, and T. Qingfeng, “Ship Berthing Safety Assessment Based on Ship-Handling Simulator,” American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 10, 2021, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20210601.12
  2. A. K. Vo, T. L. Mai, and H. K. Yoon, “Path Planning for Automatic Berthing Using Ship-Maneuvering Simulation-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 23, p. 12731, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/app132312731
  3. H.-T. Lee, J.-S. Lee, W.-J. Son, and I.-S. Cho, “Development of Machine Learning Strategy for Predicting the Risk Range of Ship’s Berthing Velocity,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 376, May 2020, doi: 10.3390/jmse8050376
  4. V. Paulauskas, M. Simutis, B. Plačiene, R. Barzdžiukas, M. Jonkus, and D. Paulauskas, “The Influence of Port Tugs on Improving the Navigational Safety of the Port,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 342, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/jmse9030342
  5. V. Paulauskas and D. Paulauskas, “Ship Mooring Methodology Designed for Ship Berthing in Extremely Limited Conditions,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 575, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/jmse13030575
  6. G. Wu, X. Zhao, Y. Sun, and L. Wang, “Cooperative Maneuvering Mathematical Modeling for Multi-Tugs Towing a Ship in the Port Environment,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 384, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/jmse9040384
  7. M. , & H. K. Sano, “A fundamental study on the ship handling simulation of tug–barge and pusher–barge systems for river service,” ICSOT India: Coastal & Inland Shipping, 2015
  8. Yangying. , C. Linying. , Z. Qingsong. , and S. Zhang. He, “Maneuvering Prediction of the Tugboat Vessel Based on CFD Methods,” Paper presented at the The 33rd International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, 2023
  9. T. Wu, R. Li, Q. Chen, G. Pi, S. Wan, and Q. Liu, “A Numerical Study on Modeling Ship Maneuvering Performance Using Twin Azimuth Thrusters,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 2167, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jmse11112167
  10. G. Taimuri, J. Matusiak, T. Mikkola, P. Kujala, and S. Hirdaris, “A 6-DoF maneuvering model for the rapid estimation of hydrodynamic actions in deep and shallow waters,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 218, p. 108103, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108103
  11. B. Zhao, X. Zhang, and C. Liang, “A Novel Parameter Identification Algorithm for 3-DOF Ship Maneuvering Modelling Using Nonlinear Multi-Innovation,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 581, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/jmse10050581
  12. Y. Xia, S. Zheng, Y. Yang, and Z. Qu, “Ship Maneuvering Performance Prediction Based on MMG Model,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 452, p. 042046, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/452/4/042046
  13. R. Okuda, H. Yasukawa, and A. Matsuda, “Validation of maneuvering simulations for a KCS at different forward speeds using the 4-DOF MMG method,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 284, p. 115174, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115174
  14. K. Dai and Y. Li, “EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION ON MANEUVERING PERFORMANCE OF SMALL WATERPLANE AREA TWIN HULL,” Brodogradnja, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 93–114, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.21278/brod72206
  15. A. Wicaksono, N. Hashimoto, and T. Takahashi, “Representation of small passenger ferry maneuvering motions by practical modular model,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 57–64, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.12.006
  16. Iswandi, R. Hidayat, and S. B. Wibowo, “An Evaluation Method of Ship-Tracking Algorithms for High-Frequency Surface Wave Radar considering High Maneuvers Generated by the MMG Model,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 2023, pp. 1–13, May 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/1481943
  17. S. Zhang, Q. Wu, J. Liu, Y. He, and S. Li, “State-of-the-Art Review and Future Perspectives on Maneuvering Modeling for Automatic Ship Berthing,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 1824, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jmse11091824
  18. C. Chen, L. Zou, Z. Zou, and H. Guo, “Assessment of CFD-Based Ship Maneuvering Predictions Using Different Propeller Modeling Methods,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1131, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/jmse10081131
  19. A. H. Muhammad, . Syarifuddin, D. Paroka, S. Rahman, . Wisyono, and A. A. Pratama, “MANEUVERING PERFORMANCE OF A 30 GT FISHING VESSEL WITH ASYMMERICAL PROPELLER CONFIGURATION,” Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 491–498, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.29244/jitkt.v9i2.19314
  20. I. Putu Sindhu Asmara and A. W. Husodo, “Ship to Ship Manoeuvring Simulation to Determine Elements of Tugboat Handling,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1081, no. 1, p. 012014, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012014
  21. IPS. Asmara, E. Kobayashi, and T. Pitana, “Simulation of Collision Avoidance by Considering Potential Area of Water for Maneuvering based on MMG Model and AIS Data,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2013, pp. 243–250. doi: 10.5220/0004478002430250
  22. A. Roubos, L. Groenewegen, and D. J. Peters, “Berthing velocity of large seagoing vessels in the port of Rotterdam,” Marine Structures, vol. 51, pp. 202–219, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.10.011
  23. H. Yasukawa and Y. Yoshimura, “Introduction of MMG standard method for ship maneuvering predictions,” J Mar Sci Technol, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37–52, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00773-014-0293-y
  24. V. V. Deogaonkar, A. K. Jadhav, K. Ramachandran, and A. S. Somayajula, “Data Driven Identification of Ship Maneuvering Coefficients,” in Volume 5: Ocean Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Jun. 2023. doi: 10.1115/OMAE2023-104644
  25. S.-H. Kim, C.-K. Lee, and S.-M. Lee, “Estimation of Maneuverability of Fishing Vessel Considering Hull-Form Characteristics,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 569, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/jmse9060569
  26. O. F. Sukas, O. K. Kinaci, and S. Bal, “Theoretical background and application of MANSIM for ship maneuvering simulations,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 192, p. 106239, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106239
  27. M. Maljković, I. Pavić, T. Meštrović, and M. Perkovič, “Ship Maneuvering in Shallow and Narrow Waters: Predictive Methods and Model Development Review,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1450, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12081450
  28. T. Fujiwara, M. Ueno, and T. Nimura, “Estimation of Wind Forces and Moments acting on Ships,” Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, vol. 1998, no. 183, pp. 77–90, 1998, doi: 10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1998.77
  29. H. Yasukawa and R. Sakuno, “Application of the MMG method for the prediction of steady sailing condition and course stability of a ship under external disturbances,” J Mar Sci Technol, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 196–220, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00773-019-00641-4
  30. I. Asmara and A. W. Husodo, “Ship to Ship Manoeuvring Simulation to Determine Elements of Tugboat Handling,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1081, no. 1, p. 012014, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012014
  31. E. Lee, A. J. Mokashi, S. Y. Moon, and G. Kim, “The Maturity of Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) and Its Implications for Innovation,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 7, no. 9, p. 287, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.3390/jmse7090287
  32. T. Emmens, C. Amrit, A. Abdi, and M. Ghosh, “The promises and perils of Automatic Identification System data,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 178, p. 114975, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114975
  33. A. A. Roubos, R. ; Williams, and P. Mirihagalla, “Recommendations for berthing velocity in PIANC WG211,” in Proceedings of the 35th PIANC World Congres 2024, 2024, pp. 1050–1056

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-08-19 00:33:16

No citation recorded.