skip to main content

Using Authentic Assessment to Measure Basic English Speaking Skill of Students Majoring in Japanese Study

*Lenggahing Asri Dwi Eko Saputri scopus  -  Applied Foreign Language, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 KIRYOKU under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims at describing the implementation of authentic assessment to measure Basic English speaking skill of students majoring in Japanese study. The description consists of three parts, namely designing the authentic assessment, implementing the authentic assessment and scoring students’ speaking skill. This study applies qualitative descriptive method. The data was collected through class observation. The result of the study revealed that authentic assessment was considered as the most effective way in assessing students’ performance in the classroom as its ability to assess the whole process of learning rather than just testing students’ knowledge at the end of the course. In conducting the authentic assessment to measure Basic English speaking skill of students majoring in Japanese study, the lecturer designed the authentic assessment based on the six steps suggested by Pierce and O’Malley (1996), implemented performance assessment to measure the students speaking skill and used analytic rubric in scoring the students speaking skill.

 

 


Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: authentic assessment; Basic English; Speaking skill; students majoring in Japanese study

Article Metrics:

  1. Al Fama, Y.A.A. Masaud. 2015. The Implementation of Authentic Assessment in Teaching Writing. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  2. Airasian, P. W. 1991. Classroom Assessment. New York: McGraw Hill
  3. Baker, E.L. 1993. Questioning the Technical Quality of Performance Assessment. The School Administrator 50 (11):12-16
  4. Bailey. 2009. Languange teacher supervision. In A. Burns and J.C. Richards (eds), Second Language Teacher Education. pp. 269 – 278. New York: Cambridge University Press
  5. Brown, H Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principle:An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York. Longman
  6. Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (5th Ed.). New York: Longman
  7. Herman, J.L., P.R Aschbacher, & L. Winters. 1992. A Practical Guide to Authentic Assessment. Alexandria, Va.: Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development
  8. Hornby, A. S. 2009. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  9. Mertler, Craig A. 2001. Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25)
  10. Mueller, Jon. 2005. Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning Through Online Faculty Development. Merlot: Journal of online learning and teaching. (Vol. 1, No. 1)
  11. Nitko, Anthony J. 1983. Educational Test and Measurement: An Introduction. New York: Harcourt Base Jovanovich
  12. O’Malley, J. Michael & Pierce, Lorraine V. 1996. Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners: Practical Approaches for Teachers. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company
  13. Trisanti, Novita. 2014. EnglishTeacher’s Perspective on Authentic Assessment Implementation of Curriculum. Proceedings The 61st TEFLIN International Conference. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press
  14. Wiggins, GP. 1993. Assessing Students’ Performance. San Francisco: Jossey bass publisher. P. 229
  15. Wiggins, G. P. 1998. Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Students’ Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Last update:

  1. Teacher Ability In Conducting Performance Assessment In Differentiate Learning

    Wardani, Dwi Rohmadi Mustofa, Undang Rosidin, Sowiyah, Hasan Hariri. Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, 6 (2), 2023. doi: 10.23887/jp2.v6i2.56374

Last update: 2024-11-21 01:25:54

No citation recorded.