skip to main content

Analisis Tindak Tutur Penolakan Dalam Keluarga Pada Drama Kyou Mo Iyagarase Bentou : Kajian Pragmatik

*Aan Amalia orcid scopus  -  Japanese Department, Faculty of Humanities, Widyatama University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 by authors under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to find out about the speech acts of refusal that are generally used in Japanese families. The research method used is a descriptive method with pragmatic equivalent data analysis.

The object of research is the drama Kyou Mo Iyagarase Bentou. In the drama Kyou Mo Iyagarase Bentou, it was found that speech acts of rejection in Japanese families almost do not use the concept of aimai to protect the feelings of the interlocutor, while speech acts of rejection in Japanese society in general are delivered politely and carefully and even seem ambiguous. Japanese people usually do not want to offend their conversation partner, in accordance with Japanese culture with the concept of aimai, but statements of rejection within the family are conveyed as they are.

From the research results, seven (7) indirect rejection speech acts were found in dialogues 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7, two (2) direct rejection speech acts in dialogues 1 and 6. This indicates that even though when refusing you do not think about the feelings of the conversation partner, you still consider the feelings of the conversation partner by not directly stating the refusal that is being conveyed.

 

Keyword : speech act, refusal, drama, direct, indirect

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: speech act, refusal, drama, direct, indirect

Article Metrics:

  1. Chaer, A. (2007). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  2. Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2004). Sosiolinguistik. Bandung: Rineka Cipta
  3. Davies, R. J., & Ikeno, O. (2011). Japanese mind: Understanding contemporary Japanese culture. United State: Tuttle Publishing
  4. Gustini, M. (2016). Tindak Tutur Menolak Dalam Bahasa Jepang dan Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Kontrastif.(S2), Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung. Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/28094
  5. Hayati, N. (2016). Analisis Kontrastif Kotowari Hyougen Antara Pembelajar Bahasa Jepang Dan Penutur Asli. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 12(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v12i2.3701
  6. Nababan, P. W. J. (1987). Ilmu Pragmatik. Jakarta: Depdikbud
  7. Nasution, L., & Hasibuan, A. S. (2019). ANALISIS TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI PADA PEMBELAJAR BAHASA JEPANG DALAM KLUB BAHASA NIHONGO DE SHABEROUKAI DI MEDAN. Kagami: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bahasa Jepang, 10(1), 41-54
  8. Nindya, E. I. H. (2017). Karakteristik Masyarakat Jepang. KIRYOKU, 1(3), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v1i3.30-38
  9. Okta, D. H., Sinaga, M., & Suri, I. (2022). Budaya Aimai dalam Anime Flying Witch Karya Katsushi Sakurabi. Ayumi, 9(2), 86-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.25139/ayumi.v9i2.4398
  10. Putri, M., Purwaka, A., Perdana, I., & Misnawati. (2023). Tindak Tutur Penolakan Ekspresif dalam Bahasa Dayak Maanyan Paju Epat di Desa Sababilah. Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(1), 142-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.59024/atmosfer.v1i1.139
  11. Reskhi, T. I. A., & Pratita, I. I. (2016). Penggunaan Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Dalam Serial Drama Rich Man Poor Woman. E-Journal Linguistik Bahasa Jepang, 03, 142 -155
  12. Rustam, R. N., & Kartika, D. (2022). STRATEGI KESANTUNAN TINDAK TUTUR MENOLAK OLEH GENERASI MUDA JEPANG DALAM ANIME JEPANG.PRODI SASTRA JEPANG Universitas Bung Hatta, 2(3)
  13. Safitri, R. D., & Mulyani, M. (2021). Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Pragmatik. KABASTRA: Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1), 59-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.31002/kabastra.v1i1.7
  14. Saitō, M. (2021). From The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter to Princess Kaguya. Japanese Language Literature, 55(1), 181-214
  15. Sugiyono. (2021). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfa Beta.Sumarsono, & P, P. (2004). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-01-31 10:11:44

No citation recorded.