Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Dan Penggunaan Strategi Kesantunan Dalam Tindak Tutur Anjuran Pada Reality Show “Terrace House: Opening New Doors”

Andardisha Getaya

doi:10.14710/kiryoku.v8i2.474-482

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v8i2.474-482

Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Dan Penggunaan Strategi Kesantunan Dalam Tindak Tutur Anjuran Pada Reality Show “Terrace House: Opening New Doors”

*Andardisha Getaya - Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{KIRYOKU65316,
    author = {Andardisha Getaya},
    title = {Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Dan Penggunaan Strategi Kesantunan Dalam Tindak Tutur Anjuran Pada Reality Show “Terrace House: Opening New Doors”},
    journal = {KIRYOKU},
  volume = {8},
    number = {2},
    year = {2024},
    keywords = {},
    abstract = {  This study aims to examine the violations of politeness principles in recommending speech acts that occur in the reality show \"Terrace House: Opening New Doors\". Based on politeness theory proposed by Leech and the politeness strategies from Brown and Levinson, the researcher analyzes data from dialogues containing recommending speech acts delivered by participants in the reality show \"Terrace House: Opening New Doors\". The research method used is descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques through observation and recording of dialogues containing recommending speech acts. The analysis method used is the referential matching method with recommending speech acts as the determining reference. The results of the study show that there are 48 violations of politeness principles in recommending speech acts. The most frequent violations occur in agreement maxim with 30 instances (63%), followed by violations of appreciation maxim with 11 instances (22%), and violations sympathy maxim with 7 instances (15%). The most frequently used politeness strategy is negative politeness strategy with 17 instances (35%), followed by bald on-record strategy with 14 instances (29%), positive politeness strategy with 10 instances (21%), and off-record strategy with 7 instances (15%). In conclusion, violations of politeness principles often occur in the delivery of recommendations, especially violations of agreement maxim. These violations caused by a lack of understanding of the interlocutor's situation and prioritizing effectiveness over politeness. The negative politeness strategy is the most used strategy to address violations of the agreement maxim, as it helps reduce discomfort and minimizes threats to negative face of the interlocutor.  },
   issn = {2581-0960},   pages = {474--482}  doi = {10.14710/kiryoku.v8i2.474-482},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/article/view/65316}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

This study aims to examine the violations of politeness principles in recommending speech acts that occur in the reality show "Terrace House: Opening New Doors". Based on politeness theory proposed by Leech and the politeness strategies from Brown and Levinson, the researcher analyzes data from dialogues containing recommending speech acts delivered by participants in the reality show "Terrace House: Opening New Doors". The research method used is descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques through observation and recording of dialogues containing recommending speech acts. The analysis method used is the referential matching method with recommending speech acts as the determining reference. The results of the study show that there are 48 violations of politeness principles in recommending speech acts. The most frequent violations occur in agreement maxim with 30 instances (63%), followed by violations of appreciation maxim with 11 instances (22%), and violations sympathy maxim with 7 instances (15%). The most frequently used politeness strategy is negative politeness strategy with 17 instances (35%), followed by bald on-record strategy with 14 instances (29%), positive politeness strategy with 10 instances (21%), and off-record strategy with 7 instances (15%). In conclusion, violations of politeness principles often occur in the delivery of recommendations, especially violations of agreement maxim. These violations caused by a lack of understanding of the interlocutor's situation and prioritizing effectiveness over politeness. The negative politeness strategy is the most used strategy to address violations of the agreement maxim, as it helps reduce discomfort and minimizes threats to negative face of the interlocutor.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan

Recent articles

Taktik Utama Kepribadian Covert Aggressive pada Tokoh Prospera Mercury (プロスペラ・マーキュリー) dalam Anime Kidou Senshi Gundam: Suisei no Majo Fatherless Child Pada Wakana Gojo Dalam Anime Sono Bisque Wa Koi Wo Suru Karya Keisuke Shinohara Representasi Hatarakisugi pada Tokoh Aoyama Takashi dalam Film Chotto Ima Kara Shigoto Yamete Kuru karya Izuru Narushima More recent articles

Most cited articles

Verba Kompon Hajimeru, Dasu, Dan Kakeru Sebagai Penanda Aspek Inkoatif Bahasa Jepang More cited articles

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Arlyanti, D. (2017). Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Manga Meitantei Conan Vol. 85. Jurnal Linguistik, 15(2), 123-135
Aslinda, A., & Syafyahya, L. (2014). Pengantar Sosiolinguistik. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jumanto. (2017). Pragmatik Dunia Linguistik Tak Selebar Daun Kelor Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Morfolingua
Kamiya, K. (2005). The Structure of Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: Kodansha International
Kumatoridani, T., & Murakami, M. (2017). Pragmatic Analysis in Japanese Contexts. In Takahashi, M. (Ed.), Language and Communication in Japan. Tokyo: Meiji University Press
Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
Makino, S., & Tsutsui, M. (1989). A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times
Muhammad. (2011). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Mulyana, Ahcmad Fajar Caca. 2022. Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Direktif dalam Novel Aobuta Volume 1 Karya Hajime Kamoshida. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Prayitno, Harun Joko. (2017). Studi Sosiopragmatik. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga
Sari, Ellysya Sulistyo. (2020). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Acara Dua Arah Kompas TV. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Shibatani, M. (1990). The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press
Supriyadi, A. (2011). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Naskah Drama Bardji Barbeh Karya Catur Widya Pragolapati. Jurnal Sastra, 7(1), 67-78
Tomatsu, Y., & Wakaru, H. (2007). Japanese Sentence Patterns for Effective Communication. Tokyo: 3A Corporation

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-15 02:19:36

No citation recorded.

Copyright Notice

Starting from 2017, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
has never been published before,
does not contain statements that violate the law, and
does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), is free from the rights of third parties, and the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article in any repository, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal (Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan).

Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.