skip to main content

Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Dan Penggunaan Strategi Kesantunan Dalam Tindak Tutur Anjuran Pada Reality Show “Terrace House: Opening New Doors”

*Andardisha Getaya  -  Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Rawamangun Muka, East Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Eky Kusuma Hapsari  -  Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Muhammad Ali Hamdi  -  Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 KIRYOKU under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to examine the violations of politeness principles in recommending speech acts that occur in the reality show "Terrace House: Opening New Doors". Based on politeness theory proposed by Leech and the politeness strategies from Brown and Levinson, the researcher analyzes data from dialogues containing recommending speech acts delivered by participants in the reality show "Terrace House: Opening New Doors". The research method used is descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques through observation and recording of dialogues containing recommending speech acts. The analysis method used is the referential matching method with recommending speech acts as the determining reference. The results of the study show that there are 48 violations of politeness principles in recommending speech acts. The most frequent violations occur in agreement maxim with 30 instances (63%), followed by violations of appreciation maxim with 11 instances (22%), and violations sympathy maxim with 7 instances (15%). The most frequently used politeness strategy is negative politeness strategy with 17 instances (35%), followed by bald on-record strategy with 14 instances (29%), positive politeness strategy with 10 instances (21%), and off-record strategy with 7 instances (15%). In conclusion, violations of politeness principles often occur in the delivery of recommendations, especially violations of agreement maxim. These violations caused by a lack of understanding of the interlocutor's situation and prioritizing effectiveness over politeness. The negative politeness strategy is the most used strategy to address violations of the agreement maxim, as it helps reduce discomfort and minimizes threats to negative face of the interlocutor.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  2. Arlyanti, D. (2017). Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Manga Meitantei Conan Vol. 85. Jurnal Linguistik, 15(2), 123-135
  3. Aslinda, A., & Syafyahya, L. (2014). Pengantar Sosiolinguistik. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama
  4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  5. Jumanto. (2017). Pragmatik Dunia Linguistik Tak Selebar Daun Kelor Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Morfolingua
  6. Kamiya, K. (2005). The Structure of Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: Kodansha International
  7. Kumatoridani, T., & Murakami, M. (2017). Pragmatic Analysis in Japanese Contexts. In Takahashi, M. (Ed.), Language and Communication in Japan. Tokyo: Meiji University Press
  8. Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
  9. Makino, S., & Tsutsui, M. (1989). A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times
  10. Muhammad. (2011). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  11. Mulyana, Ahcmad Fajar Caca. 2022. Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Direktif dalam Novel Aobuta Volume 1 Karya Hajime Kamoshida. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  12. Prayitno, Harun Joko. (2017). Studi Sosiopragmatik. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press
  13. Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga
  14. Sari, Ellysya Sulistyo. (2020). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Acara Dua Arah Kompas TV. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  15. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  16. Shibatani, M. (1990). The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  17. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  18. Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press
  19. Supriyadi, A. (2011). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Naskah Drama Bardji Barbeh Karya Catur Widya Pragolapati. Jurnal Sastra, 7(1), 67-78
  20. Tomatsu, Y., & Wakaru, H. (2007). Japanese Sentence Patterns for Effective Communication. Tokyo: 3A Corporation

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-26 02:03:05

No citation recorded.