Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{KIRYOKU88104, author = {Yasmin Tamara and Nuria Haristiani}, title = {Pragmatic Transfer in the Invitation Speech Acts of Beginner-Level Japanese Language Learners}, journal = {KIRYOKU}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, year = {2027}, keywords = {Japanese language learners; invitation speech acts; pragmatic transfer}, abstract = { Pragmatic transfer refers to the influence of first-language pragmatic knowledge on target-language use. This study aimed to describe invitation strategies used by beginning-level Japanese language learners and identify non-target-like patterns that can reasonably be interpreted as pragmatic transfer by comparing learner responses with Japanese native speakers (JNS) and Indonesian native speakers (INS). A qualitative comparative design was employed using a Discourse Completion Test (DCT) comprising four scenarios varying Power, Social Distance, and Ranking of Imposition. Responses from 15 learners, 10 JNS, and 10 INS were coded using an adapted invitation-strategy scheme based on Suzuki (2009). Evidence of first-language transfer was considered stronger when learner patterns differed from JNS while resembling INS. Results showed that sociopragmatic transfer was most evident in supportive strategies. When inviting a less familiar professor, learners used apology expressions less frequently than JNS, with their pattern more closely resembling INS. Explicit burden-minimizing expressions were absent from both learner and INS responses, while they occurred in JNS responses. A similar first-language tendency appeared in learners' frequent use of address terms when inviting a familiar professor. In contrast, learners' use of direct imperative forms toward a familiar professor was not observed in either native-speaker group, suggesting a learner-specific pragmalinguistic or developmental difficulty rather than straightforward first-language transfer. These findings highlight the importance of using both first-language and target-language baselines when identifying pragmatic transfer and of explicitly teaching context-sensitive invitation strategies. }, issn = {2581-0960}, pages = {17--34} doi = {10.14710/kiryoku.v11i1.17-34}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/article/view/88104} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Pragmatic transfer refers to the influence of first-language pragmatic knowledge on target-language use. This study aimed to describe invitation strategies used by beginning-level Japanese language learners and identify non-target-like patterns that can reasonably be interpreted as pragmatic transfer by comparing learner responses with Japanese native speakers (JNS) and Indonesian native speakers (INS). A qualitative comparative design was employed using a Discourse Completion Test (DCT) comprising four scenarios varying Power, Social Distance, and Ranking of Imposition. Responses from 15 learners, 10 JNS, and 10 INS were coded using an adapted invitation-strategy scheme based on Suzuki (2009). Evidence of first-language transfer was considered stronger when learner patterns differed from JNS while resembling INS. Results showed that sociopragmatic transfer was most evident in supportive strategies. When inviting a less familiar professor, learners used apology expressions less frequently than JNS, with their pattern more closely resembling INS. Explicit burden-minimizing expressions were absent from both learner and INS responses, while they occurred in JNS responses. A similar first-language tendency appeared in learners' frequent use of address terms when inviting a familiar professor. In contrast, learners' use of direct imperative forms toward a familiar professor was not observed in either native-speaker group, suggesting a learner-specific pragmalinguistic or developmental difficulty rather than straightforward first-language transfer. These findings highlight the importance of using both first-language and target-language baselines when identifying pragmatic transfer and of explicitly teaching context-sensitive invitation strategies.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-11-03 15:49:03
Copyright Notice
Starting from 2025, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as the following rights:
Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
Notes for Usage of Generative AI in Scientific Writing
For our policy on the use of Generative AI in scientific writing, please see our Editorial Policies page: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/about/editorialPolicies#custom-5
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.