Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{KIRYOKU88105, author = {Wina Hastuti and Nuria Haristiani}, title = {A Preliminary Study of Complaint Speech Act Strategies between Indonesian and Japanese Female Students}, journal = {KIRYOKU}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, year = {2027}, keywords = {Contrastive Analysis; Complaint Speech Act Strategy; Interpersonal Closeness}, abstract = { This preliminary study aims to examine similarities and differences in the use of complaint strategies by Indonesian and Japanese speakers in relation to interpersonal closeness. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design using contrastive analysis. Data were collected through a written Discourse Completion Test (DCT) involving an academic situation in which a friend neglected a group assignment, with five Indonesian female university students (IFS) and five Japanese female university students (JFS) as participants. A questionnaire was also administered to obtain contextual information supporting the DCT responses. The complaint utterances were coded according to the five complaint strategies proposed by Olshtain and Weinbach (1993) and compared across the two groups and interlocutor conditions. The findings show that interpersonal closeness was associated with differences in the use of complaint strategies in both groups. JFS employed a wider range of strategies, whereas IFS predominantly used Complaint and Warning and Accusation , which represent more direct complaint strategies. Interpersonal closeness was also reflected in the linguistic realization of complaints. JFS more often used interrogative and context-dependent forms, while IFS relied more on explicit negative evaluations and prohibitive forms. The role of interpersonal closeness differed between the groups: it was more apparent in linguistic realization among IFS and in both strategy distribution and linguistic realization among JFS. These findings highlight the relevance of interpersonal closeness in understanding cross-cultural differences in complaint strategies in Indonesian and Japanese. }, issn = {2581-0960}, pages = {1--16} doi = {10.14710/kiryoku.v11i1.1-16}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/article/view/88105} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This preliminary study aims to examine similarities and differences in the use of complaint strategies by Indonesian and Japanese speakers in relation to interpersonal closeness. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design using contrastive analysis. Data were collected through a written Discourse Completion Test (DCT) involving an academic situation in which a friend neglected a group assignment, with five Indonesian female university students (IFS) and five Japanese female university students (JFS) as participants. A questionnaire was also administered to obtain contextual information supporting the DCT responses. The complaint utterances were coded according to the five complaint strategies proposed by Olshtain and Weinbach (1993) and compared across the two groups and interlocutor conditions. The findings show that interpersonal closeness was associated with differences in the use of complaint strategies in both groups. JFS employed a wider range of strategies, whereas IFS predominantly used Complaint and Warning and Accusation, which represent more direct complaint strategies. Interpersonal closeness was also reflected in the linguistic realization of complaints. JFS more often used interrogative and context-dependent forms, while IFS relied more on explicit negative evaluations and prohibitive forms. The role of interpersonal closeness differed between the groups: it was more apparent in linguistic realization among IFS and in both strategy distribution and linguistic realization among JFS. These findings highlight the relevance of interpersonal closeness in understanding cross-cultural differences in complaint strategies in Indonesian and Japanese.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-11-05 01:20:07
Copyright Notice
Starting from 2025, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as the following rights:
Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
Notes for Usage of Generative AI in Scientific Writing
For our policy on the use of Generative AI in scientific writing, please see our Editorial Policies page: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/kiryoku/about/editorialPolicies#custom-5
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.