DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lenpust.v10i2.67647

Analisis Penerimaan Informasi Kekayaan Intelektual dan Akuntabilitas Dokumen (INTIPDAQU) oleh Arsiparis Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN) menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

*Dwi Ridho Aulianto orcid scopus publons  -  Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Wahyu Tri Anggoro scopus  -  Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Tiara Desyanti Raharja  -  Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Dendang Hermansyah  -  Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Received: 23 Oct 2024; Revised: 19 Sep 2024; Accepted: 20 Dec 2024; Published: 31 Dec 2024.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Recent research on the use of digital platforms for managing protected archives highlights a gap in understanding archivists' perceptions of these technologies.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of archivists within the BRIN (National Research and Innovation Agency) regarding the INTIPDAQU (Information Tracer of Intellectual Property & Document Accountability Inquiry) application, addressing the knowledge gap related to the transition from conventional to digital archive management.

Methods: A quantitative approach was used, with a survey design. Data were analyzed using regression analysis to assess the relationships between Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, attitudes toward use, and behavioral intention.

Results: The study found that 68.2% of the variation in attitudes toward use can be explained by Perceived Usefulness, while 59.8% of the variation is influenced by Perceived Ease of Use. A significant effect of Perceived Ease of Use on Perceived Usefulness was observed, with an R Square value of 0.517. Additionally, 61.7% of the variation in behavioral intention can be explained by attitudes toward use

Conclusion: These results indicate that Perceived Usefulness and ease of use are crucial in shaping positive attitudes and intentions to use the INTIPDAQU application among archivists. Further research should focus on analyzing the long-term impact of using the INTIPDAQU application on the work efficiency of archivists and its contribution to broader archive management.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Intipdaqu, Perceived Use, TAM

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Melacak Nasib Citra Daerah: Analisis Keterangan Akhir Pada Jadwal Retensi Arsip Analisis Indikator Instrumen Kecemasan (Library Anxiety) Dengan Metode Confirmator Factor Analysis di Library and Knowledge Center @Senayan Robust Clustering of Open Access Journal Based on Scopus Journal Metrics Database More recent articles
Most cited articles
Backmatter Backmatter Backmatter Frontmatter Frontmatter More cited articles
  1. Arafa, A. Z., Lestari, S. D., Sofiani, F., & Sugiarto, D. (2024). Determinants of employee attitudes and behavior to use employee self-service app. Business and Entrepreneurial Review, 24(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.25105/v24i1.19875
  2. Akutsu, S. (2017). Records management, organisational memory and archives. Records Management Journal, 27(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-06-2016-0015
  3. Ambiya, U. N., Taufiq, M., & Fitri, S. (2021). Analisis penerimaan mahasiswa terhadap sistem informasi akademik (SIAKAD) UMTAS dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Produktif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 5(2), 473-480. https://journal.umtas.ac.id/index.php/produktif/article/view/1743
  4. Andavara, V., Sundaram, B., Bacha, D., Dadi, T., & Karthika, P. (2021). The impact of Perceived Ease of Use on intention to use mobile payment services for data security applications. In Second International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC) (pp. 1875-1880). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESC51422.2021.9532771
  5. Aulianto, D. R., & Raharja, T. D. (2022). Langkah strategis fungsi kearsipan Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional pada masa transisi. Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan, 8(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.14710/lenpust.v8i2.48348
  6. Asogwa, B. E. (2012). The challenge of managing electronic records in developing countries: Implications for records managers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Records Management Journal, 22(3), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211283156
  7. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  9. Dhingra, M., & Mudgal, R. K. (2019). Applications of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use: A review. In International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement Research Trends. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART46866.2019.9117404
  10. Gunawan, F., Ali, M. M., & Nugroho, A. (2019). Analysis of the effects of Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness on consumer attitude and their impacts on purchase decision on PT Tokopedia in Jabodetabek. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.24018/EJBMR.2019.4.5.100
  11. Handayani, A. T., & Abdillah, L. A. (2019). Analisis penerimaan pengguna dalam memanfaatkan media sosial terhadap usaha kecil menengah menggunakan metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Bina Darma Conference on Computer Science (BDCCS), 1(6), 2214-2221
  12. Hidayat, H. (2022). Penggunaan metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dalam pengukuran penerapan sistem informasi penerimaan mahasiswa baru di Universitas 'Aisyiyah Bandung. INFOKOM: Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer, 10(2), 52-59. https://journal.piksi.ac.id/index.php/INFOKOM/article/view/870
  13. Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E. O. C., & Yusof, M. M. (2016). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and perceived enjoyment as drivers for the user acceptance of interactive mobile maps. [Journal/Conference Unknown], 1761. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960891
  14. Idayanti, S. (2020). Hukum bisnis. Penerbit Tanah Air Beta
  15. Istiqomah, P., & Alfansi, L. (2023). Navigating style: Exploring the influence of perceived benefit and Perceived Ease of Use on attitude towards use in AI-enhanced fashion e-commerce. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.24123/jeb.v5i1.6070
  16. Juliansyah, E., & Lawanda, I. (2024). Analisis penerimaan aplikasi naskah dinas elektronik (Nadine) di Biro Umum Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Keuangan menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan, 17(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.22146/khazanah.87801
  17. Lazuardi, A., & Gunawan, T. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak kekayaan intelektual di era revolusi industri 4.0. Sciential: Journal of Social Sciences and International Relations, 1(1), 1–20. https://jurnalsains.id/index.php/sciential/article/view/97
  18. Levesque, R. (2021). SPSS programming and data management: A guide for SPSS and SAS users. Routledge
  19. Lestarie, N. A., Budianto, A., & Prabowo, F. H. E. (2020). Pengaruh Perceived Ease of Use dan Perceived Usefulness terhadap keputusan pembelian. [Journal/Conference Unknown], 13(2), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.46306/JBBE.V13I2.43
  20. Marta, T., Mulyono, H., & Irsyadunas. (2023). Analisis penerimaan siswa terhadap penggunaan Google Classroom dengan metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.51454/decode.v3i1.71
  21. Mpinganjira, M. (2015). Perceived Ease of Use: Examining its influence on personal use of the tax e-filing system. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 12, Article 15500030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877015500030
  22. Nuranda, A. R. (2024). The influence of Perceived Ease of Use and perceived risk on intention to use through trust as intervening on the use of ShopeePay. International Student Conference on Business, Education, Economics, Accounting, and Management (ISC-BEAM), 2(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/isc-beam/article/view/47037
  23. Pradana, F., Bachtiar, F. A., & Priyambadha, B. (2019). Penilaian penerimaan teknologi e-learning pemrograman berbasis gamification dengan metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), 6(2), 163-168
  24. Rahmawati, H., Hutagalung, F., Harsono, Y. T., & Hidayatul Qoyyimah, N. R. (2024). Pro-environmental behavior model among university students. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 11(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v11i1.32182
  25. Ramba, Z. J. A., & Pratomo, L. A. (2024). The influence of attitude and desire towards intention to use online food delivery. Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service, 5(1), 111-115. https://doi.org/10.59188/devotion.v5i1.670
  26. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons
  27. Setiawan, S. I. (2022). Pengaruh Perceived Ease of Use dan perceived service credibility terhadap intention of use mobile payment di Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 6(3), 312-312. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmbk.v6i3.18673
  28. Torborg, A. (2019). Ensuring business continuity through effective vital records management. Records Management Journal, 29(1/2), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-10-2018-0035
  29. Wijaya, S. W. (2006). Kajian teoritis Technology Acceptance Model sebagai model pendekatan untuk menentukan strategi mendorong kemauan pengguna dalam menggunakan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. In Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sistem Informasi. Universitas Gadjah Mada

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-01-13 14:16:49

No citation recorded.