Assessment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) in Community Settings: A Systematic Review

Fatikhu Yatuni Asmara; Tri Nur Kristina; Diana Nur Afifah; Dian Puspita Dewi

doi:10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.34155

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.34155

Assessment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) in Community Settings: A Systematic Review

*Fatikhu Yatuni Asmara

- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Tri Nur Kristina - Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Diana Nur Afifah - Department of Nutrition Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Dian Puspita Dewi - Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{NMJN34155,
    author = {Fatikhu Yatuni Asmara and Tri Kristina and Diana Afifah and Dian Dewi},
    title = {Assessment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) in Community Settings: A Systematic Review},
    journal = {Nurse Media Journal of Nursing},
  volume = {11},
    number = {3},
    year = {2021},
    keywords = {Assessment methods; assessment tools; community setting; competencies; Interprofessional Education (IPE)},
    abstract = {  Background:  An assessment of methods and tools in interprofessional education (IPE) needs to be conducted to guarantee that the set learning objectives (LOs) or competencies are achieved, especially in community settings. This assessment is essential since in community settings, facilitators and students are not in the same frame, while direct observation is preferable in IPE. The implementation of methods and tools for assessment varies. Mostly, the assessment does not cover all competencies of IPE. Further identification of the way the assessment is conducted as well as the IPE competencies assessed is pivotal.   Purpose:  This study aimed to review the implementation of IPE in community settings, especially the assessment conducted on the methods and tools used along with the assessors involved and the competencies achieved.   Methods:  A systematic review was employed as a method in this study. Relevant articles from Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus were screened based on the inclusion criteria: publication between 2010–2020, research and review articles, full-text articles, conducted in community settings, and involved assessment in acquiring the competencies. This review included 12 out of 1,273 screened articles. The articles were analyzed qualitatively by identifying the keywords, categories, and themes.   Results:  The results showed the assessment conducted and the competencies achieved in IPE. The assessment included methods and tools as well as the assessors involved. Most existing studies used students’ perceptions or reflections as the methods and involved less assessors such as supervisors or family members. Meanwhile, the assessment tools focused on certain competencies, such as roles and responsibilities, ethics and values, teamwork, and communication. However, no study assessed all competencies.   Conclusion:  The analysis resulted in two large topics, i.e., the assessment, which includes the assessment methods and tools as well as assessors involved, and the competencies achieved. It is recommended to conduct further studies to develop objective assessment methods, comprehensive assessment tools, and generic competencies or learning outcomes. },
   issn = {2406-8799},   pages = {318--335}  doi = {10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.34155},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/34155}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Background: An assessment of methods and tools in interprofessional education (IPE) needs to be conducted to guarantee that the set learning objectives (LOs) or competencies are achieved, especially in community settings. This assessment is essential since in community settings, facilitators and students are not in the same frame, while direct observation is preferable in IPE. The implementation of methods and tools for assessment varies. Mostly, the assessment does not cover all competencies of IPE. Further identification of the way the assessment is conducted as well as the IPE competencies assessed is pivotal.

Purpose: This study aimed to review the implementation of IPE in community settings, especially the assessment conducted on the methods and tools used along with the assessors involved and the competencies achieved.

Methods: A systematic review was employed as a method in this study. Relevant articles from Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus were screened based on the inclusion criteria: publication between 2010–2020, research and review articles, full-text articles, conducted in community settings, and involved assessment in acquiring the competencies. This review included 12 out of 1,273 screened articles. The articles were analyzed qualitatively by identifying the keywords, categories, and themes.

Results: The results showed the assessment conducted and the competencies achieved in IPE. The assessment included methods and tools as well as the assessors involved. Most existing studies used students’ perceptions or reflections as the methods and involved less assessors such as supervisors or family members. Meanwhile, the assessment tools focused on certain competencies, such as roles and responsibilities, ethics and values, teamwork, and communication. However, no study assessed all competencies.

Conclusion: The analysis resulted in two large topics, i.e., the assessment, which includes the assessment methods and tools as well as assessors involved, and the competencies achieved. It is recommended to conduct further studies to develop objective assessment methods, comprehensive assessment tools, and generic competencies or learning outcomes.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Assessment methods; assessment tools; community setting; competencies; Interprofessional Education (IPE)

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 11, No 3 (2021): (December 2021)

Recent articles

Assessment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) in Community Settings: A Systematic Review Psychometric Testing of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument – Revised (English Version Including a Practice Dimension) A Qualitative Study on Nurses’ Experiences of Reporting Patient Safety Incidents in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia Editorial Back Matter Editorial Front Matter More recent articles

Most cited articles

Family Experiences of Mental Illness: A Meta-Synthesis Review: Anxiety and Quality of life in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Case Study: Evidence-Based Interventions Enhancing Diabetic Foot Care Behaviors among Hospitalized DM Patients Review: Public Health Nurses’ Roles and Competencies in Disaster Management Attitudes, Belief, and Barriers of Indonesian Oncology Nurses on Providing Assistance to Overcome Sexuality Problem More cited articles

Allvin, R., Thompson, C., Edelbring, S. 2020. Assessment of interprofessional competence in undergraduate health professions education: Protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments. Systematic Review, 9(142). http://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01394-7
Almoghirah, H., Nazar, H., & Illing, J., (2021). Assessment tools in pre-licensure interprofessional education: A systematic review, quality appraisal dan narrative synthesis. Medical Education, 55, 795–807. http://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14453
Anderson, E. S., & Kinnair, D. (2016). Integrating the assessment of interprofessional education into the health care curriculum. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 11(6), 552-558. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.10.005
Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C., Holly, C., Kahlil, H., & Tungpunkom, P. (2015). Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International Journal Evidence Based Healthcare, 13(3), 132-140. http://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055
Asmara, F. Y., & Santoso, A. (2015). The effectivity of Multi Source Feedback (MSF) to assess Professional Behaviour (PB) of nursing students: An evaluation study. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 5(2), 101 – 108. http://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v5i2.10536
Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R, Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic review. The BMJ, 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
Carr, S. (2015). Examining health professional students’ attitudes on interprofessional education. (Publication no. 309) [Doctoral Dissertations, University of Rhode Island]. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/309
Curran, V.R., Sharpe, D., Flynn, K., & Button, P. (2010). A longitudinal study of the effect of an interprofessional education curriculum on students’ satisfaction and attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork and education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24(1), 41-52. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820903011927
Davies, H. & Archer, J. (2005). Multi source feedback: Development and practical aspects. The Clinical Teacher, 2(2), 77-81. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2005.00064.x
Davis, M.H., Ponamperuma, G.G., & Wall, D. (2009). Workplace-based assessment. In: Dent, J.A & Harden, R.M. (eds). A practical guide for medical teachers. Elsevier Limited
Delunas, L. R & Rouse, S. (2014). Nursing and medical students’ attitude about communication and collaboration before and after an interprofessional education experience. Nursing Education Perspective, 35(2), 100-105. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x
Dole, D., Farley, CL., Sokas, R. K., & Kesler, J. L. (2021). Partnering to support education for midwives and nurses in liberia. Nursing for Women’s Health, 25(1), 82-92. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2020.11.002
Dressel, A., Mkandawire-Valhmub, L., Dietrichc, A., Chirwad, E., Mgawaderee, F., Kambalametoref, S., & Kakob, P. (2017). Local to global: Working together to meet the needs of vulnerable communities. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(5), 667–669
Driessen, E., Van Tartwijk, J., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Wass, V. (2007). Portfolios in medical education: Why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Medical Education, 41(12), 1224–1233. http://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1329717
Epstein, R. M. (2007). Assessment in medical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(4), 387-396. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054784
Findyartinia, A., Kambey, D. R., Yusra, R. Y., Timor, A. B., Khairania, C. D., Setyorini, D., & Soemantri, D. (2019). Interprofessional collaborative practice in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 17, 100279. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2019.100279
Gallagher, P., Pullon, S., Skinner, M., McHugh, P., McKinlay, E., & Gray, L. (2015). An interprofessional community education project as a socially accountable assessment. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(5), 509–511. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1004040
Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007). A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME guide no. 9. Medical Teacher, 28(9), 735-751. http://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701682576
Haruta, J., Ozone, S., & Goto, R. Factors for self-assessment score of interprofessional team collaboration in community hospitals in Japan. Family Medicine Community Health, 7. e000202. http://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2019-000202
Haruta, J., Yoshida, K., Goto, M., Yoshimoto, H., Ichikawa, S., Morid, Y., Yoshimie, K., & Otsukaf, M. (2018). Development of an interprofessional competency framework for collaborative practice in Japan. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(4), 436–443. http://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1426559
Horder, J. (2004). Inter-professional collaboration and interprofessional education. British Journal of General Practice, 54(501), 243-245
Housley, C. L., Neill, K. K., White, L. S., Tedder, A. T., & Castleberry, A. N. (2018). An evaluation of an interprofessional practice-based learning environment using student reflections. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(1), 108–110. http://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1356808
Kelly, P. J. (2010). Interprofessional education activity with doctorate of pharmacy & PA students at Mercer University. https://paeaonline.org/?ht%3Aa%2Fgetdocumentaction%2Fi%2F116159
Kiessling, C., Tsimtsiou, Z., Essers, G., Nuland, M., Anvik, T., Bujnowska-Fedak, M. M., Hovey, R., Joakimsen, R., Perron, N. J., Rosenbaum, M., & Silverman, J. (2017). General principles to consider when designing a clinical communication assessment program. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 1762–1768. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.027
Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., & Gilligan, C. (2013). A systematic review of the effectiveness of interprofessional education in health professional programs. Nurse Education Today, 33(2), 90-102. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.006
MacKenzie, D. E., Doucet, S., Nasser, S., Godden-Webster, A. L., Andrews, C., & Kephart, G. (2014). Collaboration behind-the-scenes: Key to effective interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(4), 381–383. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.890923
McCharty, R., Byrne-Davis, L., Hart, J., Yuill, G., Slattery, H., Jackson, M., Byrne, G. J. (2014). A feasible, acceptable and effective way to teach health care workers in low- and middle income countries a method to manage acutely. Midwifery, 31, 19-24. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.890923
McPherson, K. (2001). Working and learning together: Good quality care depends on it, but how can we achieve it?. BMJ Quality and Safety, 10(2), 46-53. http://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.0100046
Mollahadi, M., Khademolhoseini, S. M., & Khaghanizadeh, M. (2018). The portfolio as a tool for mentoring in nursing students: A scoping review. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 23(4), 241-247. http://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_195_17
Oelke, N. D., Thurston, W. E., & Arthur, N. (2013) Intersections between interprofessional practice, cultural competency and primary healthcare. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(5), 367-372. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2013.785502
Oktay, C., Senol, Y., Rinnert, S., & Cete, Y. (2017). Utility of 360-degree assessment of residents in a Turkish academic emergency medicine residency program. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17, 12-15. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.007
Opina-Tan, L. A. (2013). A pilot implementation of inter-professional education in a community academe partnership in the Philippines. Education for Health. 26(3), 164-171. http://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.125992
Page, M. J, Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M, Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, P., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … McKenzie, J. E. 2021. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Perkin, K. (2011). Nurse practitioners and interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 243-244. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.586244
Randita, A. B. T., Widyandana, W., & Claramita, M. (2019). IPE-COM: A pilot study on interprofessional learning design for medical and midwifery students. Journal of Mutidiscipline Health Care, 12: 767–775. http://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S202522
Reilly, R., Evans, K., Gomersall, J., Gorham, G., Peters, M. D. J., Warren, S., O’Shea, R., Cass, A., & Brown, A. (2016). Effectiveness, cost effectiveness, acceptability and implementation barriers/enablers of chronic kidney disease management programs for Indigenous people in Australia, New Zealand and Canada: A systematic review of mixed evidence. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1363-0
Riskiyana, R., Claramita, M., & Rahayu, G. R. (2018). Objectively measured interprofessional education outcome and factors that enhance program effectiveness: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 66, 73–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.014
Riveros, R., Kimatian, S., Castro, P., Dhumak, V., Honar, H., Mascha, E.J., & Sessler, D.I. (2016). Multisource feedback in professionalism for anesthesia residents. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia , 34, 32–40. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.038
Ryan, M., Vanderbilt, A. A., Mayer, S. D., & Gregory, A. (2015). Interprofessional education as a method to address health needs in a Hispanic community setting: A pilot study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(5), 515–517. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1020360
Sakai, I., Yamamoto, T., Takahashi Y., Maeda, T., Kunii, Y., & Kurokoch, K. (2017). Development of a new measurement scale for interprofessional collaborative competency: The Chiba Interprofessional Competency Scale (CICS29). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(1), 59-65. http://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1233943
Schmitt, M., Blue, A., Aschenbrener, C. A., & Viggiano, T. R., (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Reforming health care by transforming health professionals’ education. Academic Medicine, 86 (11). http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182308e39
Sedyowinarso, M., & Claramita, M. (2014). Interprofessional education (IPE), communication and interprofessional teamwork. In Y. S. Prabandari, F. Tetradewi, F. Fitriana (Eds.), Buku Acuan Umum CFHC-IPE [General guideline book of CFHC-IPE] (pp. 17-35). Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gajah Mada
Seif, G., Coker-Bolt, P., Kraft, S., Gonsalves, W., Simpson, K., & Johnson, E. (2014). The development of clinical reasoning and interprofessional behaviors: Service-learning at a student-run free clinic. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(6), 559-564, http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.921899
Shannon, D. W. (2017, January 7). Case study: How team training helped support rural obstetrics. American Association for Physician Leadership. https://www.physicianleaders.org/news/case-study-how-team-training-helped-support-rural-obstetrics
Shrader, S. Farland, M. Z., Danielson, J., Sicat, B., & Umland, E. M. (2017). A systematic review of assessment tools measuring interprofessional education outcomes relevant to pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(6), 119. http://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe816119
Shumway, J. M., & Harden, R. M., (2003). AMEE guide no.25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the component and reflective physician. Medical Technology, 25(6), 569-584. http://doi.org/10.1080/0142159032000151907
Soliman, S. R., MacDowell, M., Schriever, A. E., Glasser, M & Schoen, M. D. (2012). An interprofessional rural health education program. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 199. http://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610199
Solomon, P., & Salfi, J. (2011). Evaluation of an interprofessional education communication skills initiative. Education for Health, 24(2), 616
Sullivan, K., Charrette, A., Massey, C., Bartlett, D., Walker, C., Bond, I., Davies, P. B., Scheidt, N. A., & Fong, J. J., (2015). Interprofessional education with a community fall prevention event. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(4), 374–376. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.969834
Taekman, J. M., Foureman, M. F., Bulamba, F., Steele, M., Comstock, E., Kintu, A., Mauritz, A., & Olufolabi, A. (2017). A novel multiplayer screen-based simulation experience for African learners improved confidence in management of postpartum hemorrhage. Frontier in Public Health, 5, 248. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00248
Thistlethwaite, J., Dallest, K., Moran, M., Dunston, R., Roberts, C., Eley, D., Bogossian, F., Forman, D., Bainbridge, L., Drynan, D., & Fyfe, S. 2014. Introducing the individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool (iTOFT): Development and description of a new interprofessional teamwork measure. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(4), 526-528. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2016.1169262
Thistlethwaite, J. E, & Moran, M. (2010). Learning outcomes for Interprofessional Education (IPE): Literature review and synthesis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24, 503–513. http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2010.483366
Thistlethwaite, J. (2012). Interprofessional Education: A review of context, learning and the research agenda. Medical Education, 46, 58–70. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x
Vyt, A. (2017). Development and validation of a questionnaire to self-assess the quality of interprofessional team meetings in primary and community healthcare. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(2), 140–146. http://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1269058
Wagner, J., Liston, B., & Miller, J. (2011). Developing interprofessional communication skills. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 6(3), 97-101. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.12.003
Walker, L. E., Cross, M., & Barnett, T. (2019). Students' experiences and perceptions of interprofessional education during rural placement: A mixed methods study. Nurse Education Today, 75, 28–34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.012
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 3, 3-14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Yamamoto, T., Sakai, I., Takahashi, Y., Maeda, T., Kunii, Y., & Kurokochi, K. (2014). Development of a new measurement scale for interprofessional collaborative competency: A pilot study in Japan. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(1). http://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2013.851070

Last update:

Students' perceptions of the relevance of instructors' assessment items in online community-based interprofessional education
Puspo Palupi Yekti Hangujiwat, Tri Nur Kristina, Dian Puspita Dewi, Aryu Candra, Diana Nur Afifah, Fatikhu Yatuni Asmara. Jurnal Ners, 19 (2), 2024. doi: 10.20473/jn.v19i2.51634
A systematic review and quality appraisal of interprofessional behavioral assessment instruments for nursing education
Susan Welch. Nurse Education Today, 133 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106073

Last update: 2024-11-23 11:36:41

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal Author(s) Rights

In order for the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro to publish and disseminate research articles, we need non-exclusive publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro. This agreement involves the transfer or licensing of the copyright for publishing to the publisher, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. The Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro supports the need for authors to share, disseminate, and maximize the impact of their research through these rights in any databases.

As the author(s), you have rights to a wide range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institution or company. These author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing have extensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:

use for classroom teaching by the author or the author’s institution and presentation at a meeting or conference, including distributing copies to attendees;
use for internal training by the author’s company;
distribution to colleagues for their research use;
use in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works;
inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
preparation of derivative works (other than for commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes;

following the open access license of the Creative Commons CC BY-SA License.

Authors, readers, and third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (including the name of the creator and attribution parties, detailed information about the authors, a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The publisher will indicate any modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications using a CrossMark Policy and information about Erratum-Corrigendum notifications.

Authors, readers, and third parties can read, print, and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g., display it in a repository), translate the article, download it for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or reuse it for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material. They must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro).

Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)'. An e-mail will be sent to the Corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing' form by online version of this agreement.

Nurse Media Journal of Nursing and Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, the Editors and the Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Please note that even though we ask for a transfer of copyright for publishing (CTAP), our journal Author(s) retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mentioned before.

The Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form NMJN 2024]

The copyright form should be signed electronically and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original e-mail below:

Dr. Meira Erawati (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Nurse Media Journal of Nursing
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro
Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 50275
Telp.: +62-24-76480919; Fax.: +62-24-76486849
E-mail: media_ners@live.undip.ac.id

(This policy statements has been updated at 24th January 2024)

Assessment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) in Community Settings: A Systematic Review

Journal Author(s) Rights

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

OFFICE INFORMATION